Advertisement

Gated Communities in South Africa: An Emerging Paradox

  • Karina LandmanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the GeoJournal Library book series (GEJL)

Abstract

Gated communities have not only proliferated worldwide, but they are also an increasing phenomenon in the South African urban landscape. These gated developments manifest in various types and forms, including enclosed neighbourhoods, large luxury estates, gated townhouse complexes and many non-residential types of gated communities. While many support them as a way to provide safer living environments in a country plagued with high levels of crime, others criticise these developments as a contemporary form of segregation. This chapter focusses on the contradictory elements encompassed within gated communities in South Africa and highlights the emerging paradox. The chapter discusses the various types of gated communities in South Africa and their characteristics, as well as a range of contradictions that are contained within both the discourse and the practice. These contradictions embody both the social and spatial dimensions and includes binaries such as safety (inside) versus unsafety (outside); inclusion versus exclusion; job opportunities versus NIMBYSM, and a greater tax base vis a vi increased spatial segregation. The chapter argues that gated communities represents an evolving concept in South Africa that gives rise to a metamorphosis of form, function and meaning over time, which leads to various interpretations towards alternative multidimensional understandings within government, residents associations and civil society. It, therefore, rejects the notion of a unified conceptualisation in the country—both in terms of type and impact. This has several implications for both theory and practice.

Keywords

Gated community Exclusion Safety Cime 

References

  1. Ballard, R. (2004). Assimilation, emigration, semigration and integration. Under construction: “Race” and “identity” in South Africa today. Johannesburg: Heinemann Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Ballard, R., & Jones, A. G. (2014). The sugarcane frontier: Governing the production of gated space in KwaZulu-Natal. In C. Haferburg & M. Huchermeyer (Eds.), Urban governance in post-apartheid cities: Modes of engagement in South Africa’s metropoles. Stuttgart: Borntraeger Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Ballard, R., Jones, A. G., & Ngwenya, M. (2019). Trickle out urbanism: Are gated communities good for poor neighbours? Seminar presentation. In Faces of the city series. University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  4. Benit-Gbaffou, C. (2008). Unbundled security services and urban fragmentation in post-apartheid Johannesburg. Geoforum, 39, 1933–1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blakely, E. J., & Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  6. Caldeira, T. P. R. (2000). City of walls: Crime, segregation and citizenship in Sao Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chutel, L. (2018). South Africa’s gated communities are building higher walls in an already divided society, Set Apart, 9 January. Retrieved January 9, 2018, from https://qz.com/africa/1175370/johannesburgs-gated-communities-echo-apartheid-era-segregation-in-south-africa/.
  8. Coetzer, C. (2001). Crime prevention in neighbourhoods. Paper Presented at the Annual CPTED Association Conference, Sydney, September 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Culwick, C. (2015). Why gated communities threaten democratic cities. Future Johannesburg, in our future cities. Retrieved from http://futurecapetown.com/2015/brief-gated-communities/#.W354UugzaUk.
  10. Durington, M. (2009). Suburban fear, media and gated communities in Durban, South Africa. Home Cultures, 6(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dursuweit, T., & Wafer, A. (2006). Scale, Governance and the maintenance of privileged control: The case of road closures in Johannesburg’s Norther Suburbs. Urban Forum, 17(4), 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breetske, G. Landman, K., & Cohn, E. (2014). Is it safer behind the gates? Crime and gated communities in South Africa. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(1), 123–139.Google Scholar
  13. Featured Development. (2018a). Affordable estate living thrives in Joburg south. Estate Living, 22, 22–23.Google Scholar
  14. Featured Development. (2018b). Sibaya coastal precinct. Estate Living, 26, 8–9.Google Scholar
  15. Ferreira, V., & Visser, G. (2015). A spatial analysis of gating in Bloemfontein, South Africa. Bulletin of Geography: Socio-Economic Series, 28, 37–51.Google Scholar
  16. Goldhaber, R., & Donaldson, R. (2012a). Alternative reflections on the elderly’s sense of place in a South African Gated Retirement Village. South African Review of Sociology, 43(3), 64–80.Google Scholar
  17. Goldhaber, R., & Donaldson, R. (2012b). An ‘age-regation’ process as theoretical understanding of the gated retirement village. Acta Academica, 44(3), 1–23.Google Scholar
  18. Havenga, C. (2018). The use of cape vernacular architecture in gated communities in the Stellenbosh. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  19. Hook, D., & Vrdoljak, M. (2002). Gated communities, heterotopia and “Rights” of privilege: A heterotopology of the South African security-park. Geoforum, 33(2), 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Human Rights Commission. (2005). Road closures/boom gates. Johannesburg: Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  21. Landman, K. (2003). A National Survey of gated communities in South Africa. CSIR Report. BOU/I 252.Google Scholar
  22. Landman, K. (2004). Gated communities in South Africa: Comparison of four case studies in Gauteng. Pretoria, CSIR Report. BOU/I 347.Google Scholar
  23. Landman, K. (2015). Diversity in Townhouse complexes in South Africa: Exploring integrative ways of residing towards greater residential resilience. Paper presented at the CIB069 Conference, “Explorations on Residential Qualities: Situations of Dwelling, Ageing and Healthcaring. Inquiries of Transdisciplinary Nature”. October 14th–17th Chalmers Architecture Göteborg Sweden.Google Scholar
  24. Landman, K. (2017). The impact of crime and the fear thereof on the nature and use of public space in the capital city of South Africa. Paranoa, 18, 267–279.Google Scholar
  25. Landman, K. (2019). Evolving public space in South Africa: Towards regenerative space in the post-apartheid city. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Landman, K., & Badenhorst, W. (2014). Gated communities and spatial transformation in greater Johannesburg. In P. Harrison, G. Gotz, A. Todes, & C. Wray (Eds.), Changing space, changing city: Johannesburg after apartheid. Johannesburg: WITS University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Landman, K., Mmonwa, M., Matsebe, G., & du Toit, J. (2009). Medium Density Mixed Housing in South Africa: Two pilot case studies in Johannesburg CSIR Report: Document reference number: CSIR/BE/PSS/IR/2008/0046/B.Google Scholar
  28. Landman, K., & Ntombela, N. (2006). Opening up spaces for the poor in the urban form: Trends, challenges and their implications for access to urban land. Johannesburg: Urban LandMark.Google Scholar
  29. Landman, K., & Schönteich, M. (2002). Urban fortresses: Gated communities as a reaction to crime. The African Security Review, 11(4), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leisch, H. (2002). Gated communities in Indonesia. Cities, 19, 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lemanski, C. (2004). A new apartheid? The spatial implications of fear of crime in Cape Town, South Africa. Environment and Urbanization, 16(2), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lemanski, C. (2006). Spaces of exclusivity or connection? Linkages between a gated community and its poorer neighbour in a Cape Town master plan development. Urban Studies, 43, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lemanski, C., & Oldfield, S. (2009). The parallel claims of gated communities and land invasions in a Southern city: Polarised state responses. Environment and Planning A, 41, 634–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Makhale, S., & Landman, K. (2018). Gating and conflicting realities: challenges in practice and theoretical implications. International Planning Studies, 23, 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miao, P. (2003). Deserted streets in a Jammed Town: The gated community in Chinese cities and its solution. Journal of Urban Design, 8, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Naudé, B. (2003). The effectiveness of public road closures in Suburban areas as a crime reduction measure. Security Focus, 21, 34–36.Google Scholar
  37. Nel, D., & Landman, K. (2015). Gating in South Africa: A gated community is a tree; A city is not. In S. Bagaeen & O. Uduku (Eds.), Beyond gated communities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Obeng-Odoom, F., Eltayeb ElHadary, Y. A., & Jang, H. S. (2014). Life within the wall and implications for those outside it: Gated communities in Malaysia and Ghana. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 49, 544–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pow, C. (2009). Neoliberalism and aestheticization of new middle-class landscapes. Antipode, 41, 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramaroka, T., & Tsheola, J. (2014). Gated-communities and the privatizations of public spaces in urban South Africa: Democratic social integration or exclusion? Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 7, 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tshwane municipal spatial development framework. (2012). Developed by the City of Tshwane. Pretoria: City of Tshwane.Google Scholar
  42. Residential Review. (2018a). The magic of the Waterfall Estates lifestyle. Estate Living, 22, 22–23.Google Scholar
  43. Residential Review. (2018b). Mountain, winelands and the sea. Estate Living, 25, 16–17.Google Scholar
  44. Residential Review. (2018c). Simbithi eco-estate. Estate Living, 26, 24–25.Google Scholar
  45. Tedong, P. A. Grant, J., & Abd Aziz, W. (2014). Governing enclosure: The role of governance in producing gated communities and guarded neighbourhoods in Malaysia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 112–128.Google Scholar
  46. Roitman, S., Webster, C., & Landman, K. (2010). Methodological frameworks and interdisciplinary research on gated communities. International Planning Studies, 15, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smit, T., Landman, K., & Venter, C. (2015). The impact of crime and neighbourhood enclosures on travel behaviour and transport patterns in South Africa. In V. Cecatto & A. Newton (Eds.), Safety and security in transit environments. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  48. Sosibo, P. (2016). Assessing the role of gated communities in reproducing the existing patterns of urban segregation: A case study of Mount Edgecombe Country Estates, Durban, South Africa. Unpublished mini-dissertaion, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.Google Scholar
  49. Spocter, M. (2012). Gated developments: International experiences and the South African context. Acta Academia, 44, 1–27.Google Scholar
  50. Spocter, M. (2013). Rural gated developments as a contributor to post-productivism in the Western Cape. South African Geographical Journal, 95, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spocter, M. (2016). Non-metropolitan Gated Retirement Communities in the Western Cape. Urban Forum, 6, 23–38.Google Scholar
  52. Spocter, M. (2018). A toponymic investigation of South African gated communities. South African Geographical Journal, 23, 99–114.Google Scholar
  53. Tanulku, B. (2013). Gated communities: Ideal packages or procedural spaces of conflict? Housing Studies, 28, 937–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. The Developer. (2018). AMDEC GROUP leads the ‘new urbanism’ movement in SA’s cities. Estate Living, 22, 38–39.Google Scholar
  55. The Gauteng Spatial Development Framework. (2012). Developed by the Gauteng Provincial Government.Google Scholar
  56. The Gauteng Spatial Development Framework. (2016). Developed by the Gauteng Provincial Government.Google Scholar
  57. Townsend, I. J. (2002). Age-segregated and gated retirement communities in the third age: The differential contribution of place—Community to self-actualization. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tshehla, B. (2004). Do the means defeat the end? Impact of legislation on Gauteng’s enclosed neighbourhoods. SA Crime Quarterly, 9, 17–20.Google Scholar
  59. Venter, Z. (2018). High cost of safety: City’s steep fees for gated communities tested in court. Pretoria News, August 20.Google Scholar
  60. Zinn, R. (2010). Home invasions: Robbers disclose what you should know. Cape Town: Tafelberg Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations