The Presidentialisation of Government Accountability in Russia: Crisis or Transformation of Democracy?

  • Gergana DimovaEmail author
Part of the Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century book series (CDC)


Using the methodological framework set out in Chapter  5, this chapter assesses the Russian government accountability in the aftermath of media allegations. The chapter finds that the Russian president steers the accountability process, whenever government officials are criticised in the media. The empirical findings unravel the concrete ways in which the president interferes with post-scandals accountability, such as the president making decisions whether to sanction alleged incumbents on the basis of the president’s approval ratings and the president having a disproportionately big influence in producing sanctions in comparison with investigations conducted by the legislature and the courts. Furthermore, the chapter argues that the process of presidentialisation goes hand in hand with the process of personalisation of accusations, personalisation of sanctions and the personalisation of the prosecutorial office. The results constitute good indicators for gauging the tipping point when a presidential regime becomes super-presidential, thus assessing the state of democracy through the lens of accountability.


Russia President Media Putin Yeltsin Democracy 


  1. Bergman, Torbjörn, and Kaare Strøm (eds.). 2011. The Madisonian Turn: Political Parties and Parliamentary Democracy in Nordic Europe. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bevir, Mark, and Rod A.W. Rhodes. 2006. Prime Ministers, Presidentialism and Westminster Smokescreens. Political Studies 54 (4): 671–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calise, Mauro. 2005. Presidentialization, Italian Style. In The Presidentialization of Politics, ed. Thomas Poguntke and Paul Webb, 88–106. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Colton, Timothy, and Cindy Skach. 2005. A Fresh Look at Semipresidentialism: The Russian Predicament. Journal of Democracy 16 (3): 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colton, Timothy, and Michael McFaul. 2003. Popular Choice and Managed Democracy: The Russian Elections of 1999 and 2000. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dalton, Russell, and Martin Wattenberg. 2002. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dandoy, Regis. 2011. Parliamentary Questions in Belgium: Testing for Party Discipline. Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimova, Gergana. 2012. Who Criticizes the Government in the Media? The Symbolic Power Model. Observatorio (OBS*) 6 (1): 63–85.Google Scholar
  9. Fish, Steven. 2005. Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Foley, Michael. 2000. The British Presidency. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Furman, Dmitrii. 2007. The Origins and Elements of Imitation Democracies. Available at Accessed March 18, 2017.
  12. Gill, Graeme, and Roger Markwick. 2000. Russia’s Stillborn Democracy?: From Gorbachev to Yeltsin. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Golosov, Grigorii. 2003. Political Parties in the Regions of Russia: Democracy Unclaimed. Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  14. Judah, Ben. 2013. Fragile Empire: How Russia Fell In and Out of Love with Vladimir Putin. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. King, Anthony (ed.). 2002. Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcome of Democratic Elections. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Krauss, Ellis, and Benjamin Nyblade. 2005. “Presidentialization” in Japan? The Prime Minister, Media and Elections in Japan. British Journal of Political Science 35 (2): 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lobo, Marina Costa, and John Curtice. 2014. Personality Politics?: The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Monaghan, Andrew. 2011. The Russian Vertikal: The Tandem, Power and the Elections. The Chatam House. Russia and Eurasia Programme Paper REP 2011/01. Available at Accessed April 2015.
  19. Mughan, Anthony. 2000. Media and the Presidentialization of Parliamentary Elections. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Murray, Donald. 1996. A Democracy of Despots. Westview Press.Google Scholar
  21. Nakamura, Itsuro. 2010. Imperial Democratic State of Russia—Putin’s Era. Tokyo and Japan: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
  22. Noble, Ronald. 1992. The Independent Counsel Versus the Attorney General in a Classified Information Procedures Act—Independent Counsel Statute Case. Boston College Law Review 33 (3): 585–590.Google Scholar
  23. Norton, Phili. 2003. The Presidentialization of British Politics. Government and Opposition 38 (2): 274–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. NUPI Center for Russian Studies. 1994. Amnesty for Yeltsin’s Foes, Resignation of Prosecutor-General, February 26. Available at Accessed March 12, 2006.
  25. NUPI Center for Russian Studies. 2002a. Persons: Sergey Vadimovich Stepashin. Available at Accessed March 12, 2006.
  26. NUPI Center for Russian Studies. 2002b. Chronology of Events: Borodin Found Guilty of Money Laundering, March 6. Available at Accessed March 12, 2006.
  27. Okara, Andrey. 2007. Sovereign Democracy: A New Russian Idea or a PR Project? Russia in Global Affairs, 8 August. Available at Accessed July 19, 2019.
  28. Peters, Guy. 2011. After Managerialism What? The Return to Political and Strategic Priorities. Available at Accessed April 13, 2015.
  29. Poguntke, Thomas, and Paul Webb. 2005. The Presidentialization of Politics in Democratic Societies: A Comparative study of Modern Democracies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Politkovskaya, Anna. 2007. Putin’s Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy. Holt Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  31. Popova, Maria. 2012. Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. RFE/RL. 1996, February 26. Available at Accessed December 10, 2006.
  33. RFE/RL. 1997, March 10. Available at Accessed December 14, 2007.
  34. RFE/RL. 2002. Russia: Three Years Later, Moscow Apartment Bombings Remain Unsolved, September 6. Available at Accessed December 10, 2006.
  35. RFE/RL. 2005. Newsline, May 30. Accessed December 14, 2007.
  36. Sakwa, Richard. 2011. The Crisis of Russian Democracy: The Dual State, Factionalism and the Medvedev Succession. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Satarov, Georgy. 2007. The Consolidation of Dictatorship in Russia: An Inside View of the Demise of Democracy. Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schechchokin, Yurii. 2001. МЫ — РОССИЯ ИЛИ КГБ СССР? В Москве россиян ловят иностранные спецслужбы, а свои им беззастенчиво лгут. Novaya Gazeta Online, January 27. Accessed December 11, 2006.
  39. Smyth, Regna. 2006. Candidate Strategies and Electoral Competition in the Russian Federation: Democracy Without Foundation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stanley, Alessandra. 1995. Hurried by Yeltsin, a Much Criticized Attorney General Quits. The New York Times, October 9.Google Scholar
  41. Steele, Jonathan. 1995. Eternal Russia: Yeltsin, Gorbachev and the Mirage of Democracy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Treisman, Daniel. 2010. Russian Politics in a Time of Economic Turmoil. In Russia After the Global Economic Crisis, ed. Anders Aslund. Peterson Institute for Internal Economics.Google Scholar
  43. Walker, Mark. 2003. The Strategic Use of Referendums: Power, Legitimacy, and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. White, Stephen. 2000. Russia’s New Politics: The Management of a Postcommunist Society. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, Andrew. 2005. Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Zaznaev, Oleg. 2008. The Presidentialization of a Semi-Presidential Regime: The Case of Russia. In Politics and the Ruling Group in Putin’s Russia, ed. Stephen White. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Social Sciences, Forensics and PoliticsUniversity of WinchesterWinchesterUK

Personalised recommendations