Advertisement

De-parliamentarisation of Government Accountability in Germany: Crisis or Transformation of Democracy?

  • Gergana DimovaEmail author
Chapter
  • 189 Downloads
Part of the Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century book series (CDC)

Abstract

Using the methodological framework set out in Chapter  5, this chapter assesses the German government accountability in the aftermath of media allegations. It establishes that the German parliament is the main forum for investigating the government but its ability to sanction the incumbents is eclipsed by the EU, the prosecutor and internal ministerial investigations. The findings reveal an interesting trend: while the role of parliament as a venue for imposing accountability may have diminished, the role of political parties as main players in the accountability processes has been preserved but it has metamorphosed and moved beyond parliament. Parties continue to be an important factor for sanctioning the government through party meetings outside of the legislature, through the popularity of the opposition party and others. These empirical trends could serve as a novel basis for appraising democracy through the lens of government accountability.

Keywords

Germany Parliament Party Democracy Media European Union 

References

  1. Auel, Katrin. 2007. Democratic Accountability and National Parliaments: Redefining the Impact of Parliamentary Scrutiny in EU Affairs. European Law Journal 13 (4): 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailer, Stefanie. 2011. People’s Voice or Information Pool? The Role of, and Reasons for, Parliamentary Questions in the Swiss Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 302–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cole, Michael. 1999. Accountability and Quasi-Government: The Role of Parliamentary Questions. Journal of Legislative Studies 5 (1): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dandoy, Regis. 2011. Parliamentary Questions in Belgium: Testing for Party Discipline. Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Der Spiegel. 2009. Germany’s Schreiber Affair: The Scandal That Helped Merkel Become Chancellor, August 7.Google Scholar
  6. Die Welt. 2001. Machtprobe zwischen Müller und Riester, February 6.Google Scholar
  7. Die Welt. 2004. Koalitionstreffen soll Streit um Minister Schily schlichten, September 23.Google Scholar
  8. Dimova, Gergana. 2012. Who Criticizes the Government in the Media? The Symbolic Power Model. Observatorio (OBS*) 6 (1): 63–85.Google Scholar
  9. Financial Times. 2005. The Trial of Joschka Fischer, April 25.Google Scholar
  10. Finer, A. 1957. Primer of Public Administration. Frederick: Muller.Google Scholar
  11. Frankurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 2005. Volmer live im Visa-TV: Mutmaßlich hätte er sich geäußert, April 22.Google Scholar
  12. Green, Jeffrey. 2009. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCubbins, Matthew, and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mezey, Michael. 1998. Executive–Legislative Relations. In World Encyclopedia of Parliaments and Legislatures, ed. G.T. Kurian, vol. II, 780–786. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
  15. Mulgan, Richard. 2014. Accountability Deficits. In The Oxford Handbook Public Accountability, ed. Mark Bovens, Robert E. Goodin, and Thomas Schillemans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Norton, Philip. 1998. Introduction: The Institution of Parliaments. In Parliaments and Governments in Western Europe, ed. Philip Norton. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Powell, G. Bingham, and Guy D. Whitten. 1993. A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rhetorik. Ch. 2005. Joschka Fischers Rhetorik im Visa-TV Auftritt, April 25. Available at http://www.rhetorik.ch/Aktuell/05/04_25.html. Accessed April 14, 2015.
  19. Saalfeld, Thomas. 2005. Delegation or Abdication? Government Backbenchers, Ministers and European Integration. Journal of Legislative Studies 11 (3–4): 343–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saalfeld, Thomas. 2011. Parliamentary Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–10. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Strøm, Kaare, Torbjorn Bergman, and Wolfgang C. Müller. 2003. Democratic Delegation and Accountability: Cross-National Patterns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2010. TV-Sender über Interesse an Live-Übertragung Erfreut, May 17.Google Scholar
  23. Vibert, Frank. 2007. The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Social Sciences, Forensics and PoliticsUniversity of WinchesterWinchesterUK

Personalised recommendations