Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Demand for Accountability and Public Fragmentation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy Beyond Elections

Part of the book series: Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century ((CDC))

  • 460 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter suggests that the debate about public demand for government accountability is misguided. Currently, it is too focused on inquiring whether the public expects too little or too much accountability from the government. Instead, public demand for accountability should be explored through the lens of public fragmentation. The chapter summarises the diverse scholarship on public fragmentation. It suggests that the public is fragmented because of party de-alignment, modernisation, marketisation and the mutually opposing forces of globalisation and decentralisation. The main implication is that the notion of the diversity of the public challenges the principle of the aggregation of preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., et al. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance. 2003. Lifestyle Politics and Citizens Consumers: Identity, Communication and Political Action in Late Modern Society. In Media and the Restyling of Politics, ed. J. Corner and D. Pels, 137–150. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biezen, Ingrid van, and Thomas Poguntke. 2014. The Decline of Membership-Based Politics. Party Politics 20 (2): 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-democracy. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadgar, Ali. 2015. Book Review: The End of Representative Politics by Simon Tormey. The LSE Review of Books, October 15. Available at http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2015/10/15/book-review-the-end-of-representative-politics-by-simon-tormey/. Accessed March 18, 2017.

  • Dalton, Russell J., Susan E. Scarrow, and Bruce E. Cain. 2003. Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2010. The Party’s (Largely) Over, October 21. Available at http://www.economist.com/node/17306082.

  • Egeberg‚ Morten. 2008. European Government(s); Executive Politics in Transition? West European Politics 31 (1–2): 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Geoffrey (ed.). 1999. The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, Seán, and Allan Sikk. 2011. The Rise of Liberal Populism in Central and Eastern Europe. ECPR General Conference. Reykjavik: Iceland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, Seán, and Allan Sikk. 2016. Economy, Corruption or Floating Voters? Explaining the Breakthroughs of Anti-Establishment Reform Parties in Eastern Europe. Party Politics 22 (4): 522–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 2008 (1651). The Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. 2004. Who Are We?: America’s Great Debate. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, John. 2009. Monitory Democracy and Media-Saturated Societies. Griffith Review 24. Participation Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, John. 2011. A Productive Challenge Unelected Representatives Can Enrich Democracy. WZB Mitteilungen Heft 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, John. 2013. Democracy and Media Decadence. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Atul. 1991. Democracy and Discontent: India’s Growing Crisis of Governability. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krastev, Ivan. 2013. The Rise and Fall of Democracy? Meritocracy? Russia in Global Affairs, June 29. Available at http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/The-Rise-and-Fall-of-Democracy-Meritocracy-16030. Accessed February 7, 2015.

  • Krastev, Ivan. 2017. The Rise of the Paranoid Citizen. The New York Times, March 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2005. Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2013. Democracy as a Moving Target. In Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization, ed. Hanspeter Kriesi, Daniel Bochsler, Jörg Matthes, and Sandra Lavenex. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter, Daniel Bochsler, Jörg Matthes, and Sandra Lavenex. 2013. Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuper, Andrew. 2006. Democracy Beyond Borders: Justice and Representation in Global Institutions. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Kay, and Peter H. Merkl (eds.). 2014. When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 1979. Consociation and Federation: Conceptual and Empirical Links. Canadian Journal of Political Science 12 (3): 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, Marina Costa, and John Curtice. 2014. Personality Politics?: The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1991. Considerations on Representative Government. Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. The Return of the Political. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Johan P. 2013. The Institutional Basis of Democratic Accountability. West European Politics 36 (3): 447–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2013. Democracy in Crisis?: Politics, Governance and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 2007. On the Shores of Politics. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2006. Democracy Past and Future. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2011. Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 1988. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigetomi, Shinichi (ed.). 2009. Protest and Social Movements in the Developing World. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe. 2011. Diagnosing and Designing Democracy. Available at http://www.eui.eu/Documents/DepartmentsCentres/SPS/Profiles/Schmitter/DiagnosingAndDesigningDemocracy.pdf. Accessed February 2015.

  • Sikk, Allan. 2009. Parties and Populism. CEPSI Working Paper. Available at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ssees/docs/research-publications-documents/cepsi-working-papers/parties-and-populism.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2017.

  • Smulovitz, Catalina. 2003. How Can the Rule of Law Rule? Cost Imposition Through Decentralized Mechanisms. In Democracy and the Rule of Law, ed. José María Maravall and Adam Pzeworksi. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, Bernard. 2011. The Decadence of Industrial Democracies. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tormey, Simon. 2015. The End of Representative Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, Nadia. 2014. Democracy Disfigured. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Mark. (ed.). 1999. Democracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry R. 1997. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of the Law. American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, Shledon. 1996. Fugitive Democracy. In Democracy and Difference, ed. Sheila Benhabib. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, Sheldon. 2017. Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism-New Edition. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Проданов, Георги. 2014. „Качество на Демокрацията и Качество на Елитите”. в В: Канев, Добрин., Тодоров, Антоний (съст.) Качество на Демокрацията в България. Изток-Запад, София.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kръстева, Анна. 2014. „Граждански протести, Е-демокрация, Нови Мобилизации”. в В: Канев, Добрин., Тодоров, Антоний (съст.) Качество на Демокрацията в България. Изток-Запад, София.

    Google Scholar 

  • Динев, Ивайло. 2013. Между Негативня и Позитивния Протест. Култура. Available at http://www.kultura.bg/bg/article/view/20734. Accessed June 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Social Sciences, Forensics and Politics, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK

    Gergana Dimova

Authors
  1. Gergana Dimova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gergana Dimova .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dimova, G. (2020). The Demand for Accountability and Public Fragmentation. In: Democracy Beyond Elections. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25294-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation