Advertisement

The Media Age and Government Accountability: An Ambiguous Relationship

  • Gergana DimovaEmail author
Chapter
  • 202 Downloads
Part of the Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century book series (CDC)

Abstract

This chapter argues that the advancement in telecommunication technologies has not definitively made governments more or less accountable for allegations revealed in the media. It seeks to demonstrate that, theoretically speaking, the media have a double-sided influence on accountability. This realisation serves as the starting point of this book’s discussion about the larger context that defines the determinants of executive accountability. Following the recognition that the media technology can bring both negatives and positives for executive accountability, the chapter introduces a broader notion of supply of and demand for accountability, which decidedly surpasses the very ambiguous, and in the end, limited, influence of the communication technologies.

Keywords

Media Accountability Ownership Forums Communication technology 

References

  1. Alon-Barkat, Saar, and Sharon Gilad. 2016. Political Control or Legitimacy Deficit? Bureaucracies’ Symbolic Responses to Bottom-Up Public Pressures. Policy & Politics 44 (1): 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behn, Robert D. 2001. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2014. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berlinski, Samuel, Torun Dewan, and Keith Dowding. 2012. Accounting for Ministers: Scandal and Survival in British Government 1945–2007. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boin, Arjen, Allan McConnell, and Paul ’t Hart (eds.). 2008. Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boin, A., Paul ’t Hart, A. McConell, and T. Preston. 2010. Leadership Style, Crisis Response and Blame Management: The Case of Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration 88 (3): 706–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campus, Donatella. 2010. Mediatization and Personalization of Politics in Italy and France: The Case of Berlusconi and Sarkozy. International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (2): 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cairney, Paul. 2013, October. Policy Concepts in 1000 Words: Punctuated Equilibrium Theory. Available at https://paulcairney.wordpress.com/2013/10/29/policy-concepts-in-1000-words-punctuated-equilibrium-theory/. Accessed May 23, 2011.
  9. Carpini, Michael X. Delli, and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ciaglia, Antonio, and Marco Mazzoni. 2015. The Politicization of Entertainment Media: A Study of the Italian Tabloid Chi During the 2013 Electoral Campaign. Journalism 16 (6): 812–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, Stephen, and Deen Freelon. 2015. Handbook of Digital Politics. Edward Edgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Crawford, Susan. 2013. Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry and Monopoly Power in the New Gilded Age. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Debrix, Franbcois. 2007. Tabloid Terror: War, Culture, and Geopolitics. Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Denby, David. 2009. Snark: It’s Mean, It’s Personal and It’s Destroying Our Conversation. Picador.Google Scholar
  16. Dimova, Gergana. 2012. Who Criticizes the Government in the Media? The Symbolic Power Model. Observatorio (OBS*) 6 (1): 63–85.Google Scholar
  17. Djerf-Pierre, Monika, and Pierre Jon. 2016. Mediatised Local Government: Social Media Activity and Media Strategies Among Local Government Officials 1989–2010. Policy and Politics 44 (1): 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  19. Edelman, Maurice. 1996. From Art to Politics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Esser, Frank. 2013. Mediatization as a Challenge: Media Logic Versus Political Logic. In Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization, ed. Hanspeter Kriesi, Daniel Bochsler, Jörg Matthes, and Sandra Lavenex. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Esser, Frank, and Florin Buechnel. 2013. A Challenge to Democracy? In Democracy: An Ongoing Challenge, ed. Hansper Kriesi and Lars Mueller. Lars Mueller Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Flinders, Matthew. 2012. Defending Politics: Why Democracy Matters in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Friedrichsmeier, Andres, and Frank Marcinkowski. 2016. The Mediatisation of University Governance: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration of Some Side-Effects. Policy and Politics 44 (1): 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ginsberg, Benjamin, and Martin Shefter. 1991. Politics by Other Means: The Declining Importance of Elections in America. Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Grossman, Lawrence K. 1995. Electronic Republic: Reshaping American Democracy for the Information Age. Viking Books.Google Scholar
  27. Grossman, Mark. 2000. The Electronic Republic: Reshaping American Democracy for the Information Age. Longman.Google Scholar
  28. Hasler, Karin, Daniel Küebler, and Frank Marcinkowksi. 2016. Over-Responsibilised and Over-Blamed: Elected Actors in Media Reporting on Network Governance. Policy and Politics 44 (1): 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hindman, Matthew. 2008. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hood, Christopher. 2002. The Risk Game and the Blame Game. Government and Opposition 37 (1): 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hood, Christopher. 2014. Accountability and Blame Avoidance. In The Oxford Handbook Public Accountability, ed. Mark Bovens, Robert E. Goodin, and Thomas Schillemans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hutchings, Vincent L. 2003. Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn About Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jacobs, Sandra, and Thomas Schillemans. 2016. Media and Public Accountability: Typology and Exploration. Policy and Politics 44 (1): 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keane, John. 2013. Democracy and Media Decadence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Keane, John. 2014. Enlivening the Democratic Imagination. In Democratic Theorists in Conversation, 131–147. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klinj, Erik Hans. 2016. Managing Commercialised Media Attention in Complex Governance Networks: Positive and Negative Effects on Network Performance. Policy and Politics 44 (1): 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2013. Democracy as a Moving Target. In Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization, ed. Hanspeter Kriesi, Daniel Bochsler, Jörg Matthes, and Sandra Lavenex. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Daniel Bochsler, Jörg Matthes, and Sandra Lavenex. 2013. Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. March, James G., and Johan Olson. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Markovits, Andrei, and Mark Silverstein. 1991. The Politics of Scandal: Power and Process in Liberal Democracies. Holmes & Meier Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Meyer, Thomas. 2002. Media Democracy: How the Media Colonize Politics. Polity Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mulgan, Richard. 2003. Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-industrial Societies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2013. Democracy in Crisis?: Politics, Governance and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Peruzzotti, Enrique, and Catalina Smulovitz (eds.). 2006. Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social Accountability in the New Latin American Democracies. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  47. Pickard, Victor. 2014. America’s Battle for Media Democracy: The Triumph of Corporate Libertarianism and the Future of Media Reform. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Power, Michael. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rancière, Jacques. 2007. On the Shores of Politics. Verso Books.Google Scholar
  50. Riegert, Kristina (ed.). 2007. Politicotainment: Television’s Take on the Real. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
  51. Schillemans, Thomas. 2012. Mediatization of Public Services: How Organizations Adapt to News Media. Peter Lang GmbH.Google Scholar
  52. Schillemans, Thomas. 2016. Fighting or Fumbling with the Beast? The Mediatisation of Public Sector Agencies in Australia and the Netherlands. Policy and Politics 44 (1): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schudson, Michael. 2013. Click Here for Democracy: A History and Critique of an Information-Based Model of Citizenship. In Democracy and the New Media, ed. Henry Jenkins and David Thorburn. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schuler, Doug. 2003. Reports of the Close Relationship Between Democracy and the Internet May Have Been Exaggerated. In Democracy and the New Media, ed. Henry Jenkins and David Thorburn. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  55. Shah, D., et al. 2007. Political Consumerism: How Communication and Consumption Orientations Drive ‘Life Style Politics’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611 (1): 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shapiro, Robert Y., and Lawrence R. Jacobs (eds.). 2011. The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Shudson, Michael. 2010. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Slaughter, Steven. 2014. WikiLeaks and the Limits of Democracy and Transnational Democratisation. In Democracy and Crisis, ed. Benjamin Isakhan and Steven Slaughter. Palgrave.Google Scholar
  59. Sunstein, Cass. 2009. Republic.Com 2.0. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Thompson, John B. 1995. The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Thompson, John. 1996. The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Thompson, John. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Polity Press.Google Scholar
  63. Urbinati, Nadia. 2014. Democracy Disfigured. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Van Zoonen, Liesbet. 2004. Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  65. Yankova-Dimova, Gergana. 2013. Media Scandals: How Political Scandals Arise. Global Media Journal (Russian Edition) 3 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
  66. Whitehead, Laurence. 2015. The Information Revolution and Its Implication for Democracy. Herminios Festschrift.Google Scholar
  67. Zaller, John. 2003. A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen. Political Communication 20 (2): 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Social Sciences, Forensics and PoliticsUniversity of WinchesterWinchesterUK

Personalised recommendations