Skip to main content

When Preferences Matter More

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Preferential Voting Systems
  • 401 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the comparative statistical analysis including all the cases in the research. Finally, the author summarizes the book’s main results, the theoretical consequences, and the possible further steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The number of cases is slightly lower than for all the other variables. This is due to the fact that, for a few countries, data on this variable are not available.

  2. 2.

    I have done a simulation of all the possible outcome, and I have estimated the correlation in 500 sample. According the results, the index is not significative correlated (p-value < 0.001).

  3. 3.

    In my sample, only Belgium, Brazil, and Peru have a compulsory electoral system, albeit with different levels of implementation and penalties for those not attending the polls. I have included this variable in my analysis.

References

  • Blais, A., and R.K. Carty. 1990. Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout? European Journal of Political Research 18 (2): 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J., and M. Shugart. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matland, R.E., and D.T. Studlar. 2004. Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross-National Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passarelli, G. 2018. Electoral Systems in Context: Italy. In The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, ed. E. Herron, R. Pekkanen, and M.S. Shugart, 851–870. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, M.N. 1966. Preferential Voting in Denmark: The Voters Influence on the Election of Folketing Candidates. Scandinavian Political Studies 1 (1): 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E.E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, M. 2005. Comparative Electoral Systems Research: The Maturation of a Field and New Challenges Ahead. In The Politics of Electoral Systems, ed. M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell, 25–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Passarelli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Passarelli, G. (2020). When Preferences Matter More. In: Preferential Voting Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25286-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics