Skip to main content

Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of the Usability and Usefulness of the First Viewbrics-Prototype: A Methodology and Online Tool to Formatively Assess Complex Generic Skills with Video-Enhanced Rubrics (VER) in Dutch Secondary Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology Enhanced Assessment (TEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1014))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Rubrics support students in learning complex generic (21st century) skills, as they provide textual descriptions of skills’ mastery levels with performance indicators for all constituent subskills. If students know their current and strived-for mastery level, they can better determine subsequent learning activities towards skills mastery. However, text-based rubrics have a limited capacity to support the formation of mental models of a complex skill. Video-enhanced rubrics (VER) with video modeling examples have the potential to improve and enrich mental model formation, feedback quality, and thus improve students’ performance.

In the Viewbrics-project we therefore developed, through design-based research, a methodology for the formative assessment of complex skills with Video-Enhanced Rubrics (VER), precipitated in an online tool. This paper describes the features of the first prototype of this online tool and the results of a stakeholder evaluation of its perceived usefulness and usability, by means of a questionnaire and card-sorting exercise, with 7 teachers and 21 students of two secondary schools.

The evaluation of this first prototype showed that both teachers and students evaluated the online tool and formative assessment methodology as handy, usable, helpful and feasible for learning complex skills, although some recommendations were made to further improve the design of the tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Voogt, J., Roblin, N.P.: A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: implications for national curriculum policies. J. Curric. Stud. 44, 299–321 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirschner, P., Van Merriënboer, J.: Ten steps to complex learning a new approach to instruction and instructional design. In: Good, T.L. (ed.) 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook, pp. 244–253. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Galligan, F., et al.: Advanced PE for Edexcel. Heinemann Educational Publishers, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowman, K.: Background paper for the AQF Council on generic skills, Canberra (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rusman, E., Martínez-Monés, A., Boon, J., Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Villagrá-Sobrino, S.: Gauging teachers’ needs with regard to technology-enhanced formative assessment (TEFA) of 21st century skills in the classroom. In: Kalz, M., Ras, E. (eds.) CAA 2014. CCIS, vol. 439, pp. 1–14. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08657-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Thijs, A., Fisser, P., van der Hoeven, M.: 21E Eeuwse Vaardigheden in Het Curriculum Van Het Funderend Onderwijs. Slo, p. 128 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andrade, H., Du, Y.: Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 10, 1–11 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A.: The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: a review. Educ. Res. Rev. 9, 129–144 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schildkamp, K., Heitink, M., Van Der Kleij, F., Hoogland, I., Dijkstra, A., Kippers, W.: Voorwaarden voor effectieve formatieve toetsing - een praktische review, Enschede (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berry, O., Price, M., Rust, C., Donovan, B.O., Price, M., Rust, C.: Teaching in higher education know what i mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teach. High. Educ. 37–41 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Westera, W.: On the changing nature of learning context: anticipating the virtual extensions of the world. Educ. Technol. Soc. 14, 201–212 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Gog, T., Verveer, I., Verveer, L.: Learning from video modeling examples: Effects of seeing the human model’s face. Comput. Educ. 72, 323–327 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Grez, L., Valcke, M., Roozen, I.: The differential impact of observational learning and practice- based learning on the development of oral presentation skills in higher education. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 33, 256–271 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohbanfard, H., Proteau, L.: Live vs video presentation techniques in the observational learning of motor skills. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 2, 27–32 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Gog, T., Rummel, N.: Example-based learning: integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22, 155–174 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baecher, L., Kung, S.C., Jewkes, A.M., Rosalia, C.: The role of video for self-evaluation in early field experiences. Teach. Teach. Educ. 36, 189–197 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Plomp, T., Nieveen, N.: Educational design research: an introduction. In: Plomp, T., Nieveen, N. (eds.) Educational Design Research, pp. 10–51. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development, Enschede (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ackermans, K., Rusman, E., Brand-Gruwel, S., Specht, M.: The dilemmas of formulating theory-informed design guidelines for a video enhanced rubric. In: Ras, E., Guerrero Roldán, A.E. (eds.) TEA 2017. CCIS, vol. 829, pp. 123–136. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97807-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Last, J., Simmons, S., Keene, C.: Card sorting-design research techniques

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the Viewbrics-project, officially called ‘Formative assessment of complex skills with video-enhanced rubrics in secondary education’, a three-year research and development project funded by the Netherlands Initiative for Education Research (NRO), project number 405-15-550.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen Rusman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rusman, E., Nadolski, R., Ackermans, K. (2019). Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of the Usability and Usefulness of the First Viewbrics-Prototype: A Methodology and Online Tool to Formatively Assess Complex Generic Skills with Video-Enhanced Rubrics (VER) in Dutch Secondary Education. In: Draaijer, S., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., Ras, E. (eds) Technology Enhanced Assessment. TEA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1014. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25264-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25264-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25263-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25264-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics