Skip to main content

The Shape of Things to Come

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Industrial Organization to Entrepreneurship
  • 495 Accesses

Abstract

In the summer of 1999 two economists, David and Jürgen, were strolling along the lakeshore promenade of Lake Mendota, Madison, Wisconsin. It was a beautiful, serene summer evening. That past afternoon they had presented a paper at the Econometric Society Summer Meetings on the influence of industry knowledge conditions, firm size and ownership structures on innovation and investment. The topic had attracted some prominent scholars in the field who vividly discussed the paper and provided valuable comments. Walking at a leisurely place David and Jürgen were reflecting on the session and how to utilize the received feedback to improve their paper for submission (After many revisions this ESSM paper was published as Audretsch and Weigand (2005)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See e.g. Kurz and Salvadori (2003) for discussion.

  2. 2.

    Formally, ω_x = ∂Q/∂x x/Q is the output elasticity of the respective input factor, x = K, L.

  3. 3.

    See for overviews and discussions e.g. Maddison (1987), Griliches (1996), Barro (1999), or the contributions in Boianovsky and Hoover (2009).

  4. 4.

    It is not the place to review this literature. However, we at least want to mention some path-breaking work, such as Nelson and Winter (1982) in theory, Jewkes et al. (1969) in case study research, and Mansfield (1962, 1963) and Scherer (1965) in empirical testing.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure and firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 567–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78, 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1991). R&D, firm size, and innovative activity. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Innovation and technological change: An international comparison. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aspromourgos, T. (2010). Universal opulence: Adam Smith on technical progress and real wages. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17, 1169–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (1995a). Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (1995b). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2009). The entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1242–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M., & Lehmann, E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Weigand, J. (2005). Do knowledge conditions make a difference? Investment, finance and ownership in German industries. Research Policy, 34, 595–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, J. (2017). Robot-proof, higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1999). Notes on growth accounting. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boianovsky, M., & Hoover, K. D. (2009). Robert Solow and the development of growth economics. History of Political Economy 41, Annual Supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science Magazine, 358(6370), 1530–1534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cometlabs. (2017). Available online at: https://blog.cometlabs.io/263-self-driving-car-startups-to-watch-8a9976dc62b0

  • Davenport, T. (2006). Competing on Analytics. Harvard Business Review, 84, 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, R., Manyika, J., & Woetzel, J. (2015). No ordinary disruption. The four global forces breaking all the trends. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doganoglu, T., & Wright, J. (2006). Multihoming and compatibility. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (2001) The next society, The Economist, 1st November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2017a). Available online at: https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21721656-data-economy-demands-new-approach-antitrust-rules-worlds-most-valuable-resource

  • Economist. (2017b). Available online at: https://www.economist.com/business/2017/12/07/google-leads-in-the-race-to-dominate-artificial-intelligence

  • Economist. (2018). Available online at: https://www.economist.com/bartleby/2018/07/12/the-robots-coming-for-your-job

  • Fellner, W. (1949). Competition among the few. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1996). The discovery of the residual: A historical note. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1324–1330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haucap, J., & Heimeshoff, U. (2014). Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization? International Economics and Economic Policy, 11, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. V. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1935). Annual survey of economic theory: The theory of monopoly. Econometrica, 3, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITIF. (2017). How technology-based start-ups support U.S. Economic Growth. Online available at: https://itif.org/publications/2017/11/28/how-technology-based-start-ups-support-us-economic-growth

  • Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, J., Sawers, D., & Stillerman, R. (1969). The sources of invention (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Just, N. (2018). Governing online platforms: Competition policy in times of Platformization. Telecommunications Policy, 42, 386–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinos, C., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292–2303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2017). Available online at: https://home.kpmg.com/sg/en/home/media/press-releases/2018/01/kpmg-venture-pulse-q4-2017.html

  • Kurz, H. D., & Salvadori, N. (2003). Theories of economic growth – old and new, Ch. 1. In N. Salvadori (Ed.), The theory of economic growth – a ‘classical’ perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M., Hollnbuchner, K., Just, N., & Saurwein, F. (2016). The economics of algorithmic selection on the Internet. In J. M. Bauer & M. Latzer (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of the internet. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D., & Chang, V. (2016). A review and future direction of agile, business intelligence, analytics and data science. International Journal of Information Management, 36, 700–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, E.-P., Chen, H., & Chen, G. (2013). Business intelligence and analytics. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 3, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (1987). Growth and slowdown in advanced capitalist economies: Techniques of quantitative assessment. Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 649–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (1992). Learning by firms and incremental technical change. Economic Journal, 102, 845–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, gibrat’s law, innovation and growth of firms. American Economic Review, 55, 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1963). Size of firms, market structure and innovation. Journal of Political Economy, 71, 556–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., John, R., Anthony, R., Edmond, V., Samuel, W., & Frank, H. (1977). The production and application of new industrial technology. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics: An introductory. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, P. (2016). PostCapitalism: A guide to our future. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R. P., & McMillian, J. (1995). Organizational diseconomies of scale. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 4, 399–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moazed, A., & Johnson, N. L. (2016). Modern monopolies: What it takes to dominate the 21st century. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietersen, W. (2002). Reinventing strategy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2011). The third industrial revolution. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 645–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented innovation. American Economic Review, 55, 1097–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1912). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, München/Leipzig: Dunker & Humblot, as Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934, 3rd printing 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles. A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1928). The instability of capitalism. Economic Journal, 38, 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1947). The creative response in economic history. Journal of Economic History, 7, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, Y., Perrault, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Clark, J., & LeGassick, C. (2017). Artificial intelligence index – 2017 annual report, https://aiindex.org/2017-report.pdf

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Reprint 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. (1951). The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 59, 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundajararan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2016). Sustainable development goals. Online available at: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/

  • Von Blanckenburg, K., & Michaelis, M. (2008). Regulierungsmöglichkeiten auf dem Markt für Online-Auktionen. Wirtschaftsdienst, 88, 415–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. (1984). Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 5, 287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zang, C., Cui, P., & Faloutsos, C. (2016). Beyond sigmoids: The NetTide model for social network growth, and its applications. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2015–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Prause .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Prause, M., Weigand, J. (2019). The Shape of Things to Come. In: Lehmann, E., Keilbach, M. (eds) From Industrial Organization to Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25237-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics