Skip to main content

Private Payer Initiatives for Quality Improvement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 538 Accesses

Abstract

With evidence for wide variation in the quality and cost of inpatient surgery in the United States, payers and policy makers have increasingly pursued strategies to improve the cost-effectiveness of surgical care. Payer-funded collaborative quality improvement (CQI) efforts represent an innovative and effective means of enhancing surgical care across a large population. Unlike more top-down approaches, such as pay-for- performance measures, CQI programs engage multiple stakeholders, foster knowledge sharing, and rely on cooperative efforts to drive quality. Most are centered around a robust clinical registry which provides data to allow for benchmarking of outcomes, identification of problem areas, and evaluation of quality improvement efforts. Payer- funded CQI efforts such as the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative have led to substantial reductions in unnecessary procedures, adverse events, and costs following surgery. The CQI model has proven to be an effective vehicle for advancing innovations in care and reducing unwanted variation across providers. Efforts to replicate this model on a national level will require the participation of both public and private payers and face many challenges. Ultimately, however, partnerships between payers, hospitals, and surgeons can be a win for all, especially for our patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ, Skinner JS. Hospital quality and the cost of inpatient surgery in the United States. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182402c17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wakeam E, Molina G, Shah N, Lipsitz SR, Chang DC, Gawande AA, et al. Variation in the cost of 5 common operations in the United States. Surgery. 2017;162(3):592–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.04.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Munoz E, Munoz W 3rd, Wise L. National and surgical health care expenditures, 2005–2025. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cbcc9a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dimick JB, Chen SL, Taheri PA, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Campbell DA Jr. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(4):531–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Share DA, Campbell DA, Birkmeyer N, Prager RL, Gurm HS, Moscucci M, et al. How a regional collaborative of hospitals and physicians in Michigan cut costs and improved the quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(4):636–45. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fry BT, Scally CP, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Quality improvement in bariatric surgery: the impact of reducing postoperative complications on Medicare payments. Ann Surg. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002613.

  7. Scally CP, Thumma JR, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Impact of surgical quality improvement on payments in Medicare patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):249–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang V, Blackwell RH, Markossian T, Yau RM, Blanco BA, Zapf MAC, et al. Discordance between surgical care improvement project adherence and postoperative outcomes: implications for new joint commission standards. J Surg Res. 2017;212:205–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, Aron DC, Fu P, Koroukian SM. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA. 2010;303(24):2479–85. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.841.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee GM, Kleinman K, Soumerai SB, Tse A, Cole D, Fridkin SK, et al. Effect of nonpayment for preventable infections in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(15):1428–37. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1202419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rajaram R, Chung JW, Kinnier CV, Barnard C, Mohanty S, Pavey ES, et al. Hospital characteristics associated with penalties in the centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program. JAMA. 2015;314(4):375–83. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.8609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Joynt KE, Jha AK. Thirty-day readmissions – truth and consequences. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(15):1366–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1201598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morton JM, Garg T, Nguyen N. Does hospital accreditation impact bariatric surgery safety? Ann Surg. 2014;260(3):504–8.; discussion 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawn MT, Vick CC, Richman J, Holman W, Deierhoi RJ, Graham LA, et al. Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):494–9.; discussion 9–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c6929.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(2):111–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ketelaar NA, Faber MJ, Flottorp S, Rygh LH, Deane KH, Eccles MP. Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD004538. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004538.pub2.

  17. Houle SK, McAlister FA, Jackevicius CA, Chuck AW, Tsuyuki RT. Does performance-based remuneration for individual health care practitioners affect patient care?: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(12):889–99. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-12-201212180-00009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ibrahim AM, Ghaferi AA, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Variation in outcomes at bariatric surgery centers of excellence. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(7):629–36. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0542.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Birkmeyer NJ, Birkmeyer JD. Strategies for improving surgical quality – should payers reward excellence or effort? N Engl J Med. 2006;354(8):864–70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb053364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Werner RM, Asch DA. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1239–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.10.1239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farmer SA, Black B, Bonow RO. Tension between quality measurement, public quality reporting, and pay for performance. JAMA. 2013;309(4):349–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.191276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Eppstein MJ, Horbar JD, Buzas JS, Kauffman SA. Searching the clinical fitness landscape. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49901. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kilo CM. A framework for collaborative improvement: lessons from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Breakthrough Series. Qual Manag Health Care. 1998;6(4):1–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Luckenbaugh AN, Miller DC, Ghani KR. Collaborative quality improvement. Curr Opin Urol. 2017;27(4):395–401. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Benn J, Burnett S, Parand A, Pinto A, Vincent C. Factors predicting change in hospital safety climate and capability in a multi-site patient safety collaborative: a longitudinal survey study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(7):559–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aveling EL, Martin G, Armstrong N, Banerjee J, Dixon-Woods M. Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(2):158–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261211230754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parboosingh JT. Physician communities of practice: where learning and practice are inseparable. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2002;22(4):230–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340220407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaw EK, Chase SM, Howard J, Nutting PA, Crabtree BF. More black box to explore: how quality improvement collaboratives shape practice change. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(2):149–57. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110090.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Stoopendaal A, Bal R. Conferences, tablecloths and cupboards: how to understand the situatedness of quality improvements in long-term care. Soc Sci Med. 2013;78:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Matthews JB. Risky business? Collaborative databases and quality improvement. Arch Surg. 2012;147(7):605–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gurm HS, Smith DE, Berwanger O, Share D, Schreiber T, Moscucci M, et al. Contemporary use and effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(1):98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Watson SR, Scales DC. Improving intensive care unit quality using collaborative networks. Crit Care Clin. 2013;29(1):77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2012.10.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Likosky DS, Nugent WC, Ross CS. Improving outcomes of cardiac surgery through cooperative efforts: the northern new England experience. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;9(2):119–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, Morton JR, Maloney CT, Nugent WC, et al. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA. 1996;275(11):841–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Flum DR, Fisher N, Thompson J, Marcus-Smith M, Florence M, Pellegrini CA. Washington State’s approach to variability in surgical processes/outcomes: surgical clinical outcomes assessment program (SCOAP). Surgery. 2005;138(5):821–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kwon S, Florence M, Grigas P, Horton M, Horvath K, Johnson M, et al. Creating a learning healthcare system in surgery: Washington State’s surgical care and outcomes assessment program (SCOAP) at 5 years. Surgery. 2012;151(2):146–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cuschieri J, Florence M, Flum DR, Jurkovich GJ, Lin P, Steele SR, et al. Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington state surgical care and outcomes assessment program. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):557–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318187aeca.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Campbell DA Jr, Krapohl GL, Englesbe MJ. Conceptualizing partnerships between private payers and Medicare for quality improvement initiatives. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(1):4–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Birkmeyer NJ, Finks JF, English WJ, Carlin AM, Hawasli AA, Genaw JA, et al. Risks and benefits of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(4):173–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Birkmeyer NJ, Share D, Baser O, Carlin AM, Finks JF, Pesta CM, et al. Preoperative placement of inferior vena cava filters and outcomes after gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):313–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e61e4f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Abdel Khalik H, Stevens H, Carlin AM, Stricklen A, Ross R, Pesta C, et al. Site-specific approach to reducing emergency department visits following surgery. Ann Surg. 2018;267(4):721–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Stevens H, Wells E, Ross R, Stricklen A, Ghaferi AA. Patient perspectives on emergency department self-referral after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.015.

  43. Morton J. The first metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program quality initiative: decreasing readmissions through opportunities provided. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(3):377–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1434–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1300625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Greenberg CC, Dombrowski J, Dimick JB. Video-based surgical coaching: an emerging approach to performance improvement. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(3):282–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4442.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Varban OA, Niemann A, Stricklen A, Ross R, Ghaferi AA, Finks JF, et al. Far from standardized: using surgical videos to identify variation in technique for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(8):761–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Waljee JF, Ghaferi A, Cassidy R, Varban O, Finks J, Chung KC, et al. Are patient-reported outcomes correlated with clinical outcomes after surgery?: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 2016;264(4):682–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Waljee JF, Ghaferi A, Finks JF, Cassidy R, Varban O, Carlin A, et al. Variation in patient-reported outcomes across hospitals following surgery. Med Care. 2015;53(11):960–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Scales DC. Partnering with health care payers to advance the science of quality improvement: lessons from the field. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(9):987–8. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201107-1238ED.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ferguson TB Jr. The Institute of Medicine committee report “best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care”. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(6):e93–4. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.968768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan F. Finks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Finks, J.F. (2019). Private Payer Initiatives for Quality Improvement. In: Morton, J., Brethauer, S., DeMaria, E., Kahan, S., Hutter, M. (eds) Quality in Obesity Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25173-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25173-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25172-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25173-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics