Skip to main content

Utilization of the Electronic Medical Record to Enhance Value in Bariatric Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 547 Accesses

Abstract

As electronic medical records mature and documentation and compliance requirements continue to increase, the inclusion of quality metrics into the daily workflow of patient care is becoming more important. Various EMR vendors can provide products to facilitate the implementation of care paths and adherence measurements into the medical record. Incorporating key metrics and, in some cases, customized quality measures into the outpatient and inpatient medical record serves to increase adherence to these measures and to drive improvement at the enterprise, department, and physician level. The EMR can also be used to better engage patients and families in their healthcare, improve care coordination, and potentially improve population and public health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Burt CW, Sisk JE. Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records? Health Aff. 2005;24(5):1334–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cutler DM, Feldman NE, Horwitz JR. “U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry systems,” health affairs 24, no. 6 (2005): 1654–1663; and J.S. ash et al., “computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey,”. J Am Inform Assoc. 2004;11(2):95–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system, committee on quality of health care in America. Washington, D.C.: Intitute of Medicine National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 171/Tuesday, September 4, 2012/rules and regulations, pp 53971.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 171/Tuesday, September 4, 2012/rules and regulations pp 54095.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flum DR, Salem L, Elrod JA, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L. Early mortality among medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1903–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamoom E, Yang N. Table of electronic health record adoption and use among office-based physicians in the U.S., by state: 2015 National Electronic Health Records Survey. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony T. Petrick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petrick, A.T., Brethauer, S.A. (2019). Utilization of the Electronic Medical Record to Enhance Value in Bariatric Care. In: Morton, J., Brethauer, S., DeMaria, E., Kahan, S., Hutter, M. (eds) Quality in Obesity Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25173-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25173-4_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25172-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25173-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics