Skip to main content

Lessons Learned from ACS NSQIP

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality in Obesity Treatment
  • 551 Accesses

Abstract

Surgical quality improvement came to the forefront of the American healthcare system beginning with the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VA NSQIP) in the 1990s. Subsequent expansions and improvements led directly to the modern-day American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®), which has now recorded the outcomes of more than five millions surgical cases. Data have been shown to be reliable on multiple audits and validation studies. Enrollment has flourished, with more than 800 participating adult and pediatric centers. Robust engagement from the surgical community has led to significant improvement in the quality of care at participating hospitals, and these quality improvements have been shown to strengthen with time. Successful quality programs combine excellent local support, outstanding statistical analysis, and actionable feedback to hospitals in order to drive improvements in the quality of surgical care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ACS:

American College of Surgeons

NSQIP :

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

PUF:

Participant use data file

SAR:

Semiannual report

SCR:

Surgical clinical reviewer

VA:

Veterans affairs

References

  1. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):491–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, et al. The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(6):1089–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, et al. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(2):336–46 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guillamondegui OD, Gunter OL, Hines L, et al. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee surgical quality collaborative to improve surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(4):709–14; discussion 714–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maggard-Gibbons M. The use of report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(7):589–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollenbeak CS, Boltz MM, Wang L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 2011;254(4):619–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, et al. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):363–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen ME, Liu Y, Ko CY, Hall BL. Improved surgical outcomes for ACS NSQIP hospitals over time: evaluation of hospital cohorts with up to 8 years of participation. Ann Surg. 2016;263(2):267–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawson EH, Hall BL, Louie R, et al. Association between occurrence of a postoperative complication and readmission: implications for quality improvement and cost savings. Ann Surg. 2013;258(1):10–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huffman KM, Cohen ME, Ko CY, Hall BL. A comprehensive evaluation of statistical reliability in ACS NSQIP profiling models. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1108–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. User guide for the 2016 ACS NSQIP participant use data file (PUF). https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/nsqip/nsqip_puf_userguide_2016.ashx October 2017. Accessed 19 Feb 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clifford Y. Ko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ellis, R.J., Ko, C.Y. (2019). Lessons Learned from ACS NSQIP. In: Morton, J., Brethauer, S., DeMaria, E., Kahan, S., Hutter, M. (eds) Quality in Obesity Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25173-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25173-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25172-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25173-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics