Skip to main content

Building a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Data Registry: Quality Improvement Through Measurement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality in Obesity Treatment
  • 538 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of data analytics and its use in clinical care of patients continues to accelerate in healthcare whereby providers and facilities alike are migrating from a pay-for-procedure to a pay-for-performance framework. Measurement of data against peer groups is of utmost importance because quality improvement efforts are predicated on the notion that we cannot improve what we do not measure. Successful metabolic and bariatric surgery programs must be supported by a rich data registry as a basis for their local quality improvement efforts which seek to standardize care for the patients they serve. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) collects prospective data and performs risk adjustment following a uniform set of definitional principles regarding patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative events. Due to the inherent rigor in this process, programs can feel confident that they are measured equitably among their peers. The use of standardized data collection promotes immeasurable value for patients, as the data used at both the local and national level supports principles which seek to improve efficiency, quality, and complication rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DePalma AF. Earnest armory Codman (1869–1940): a biography. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1961;20:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chun J, Bafford AC. History and background of quality measurement. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014;27:5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;3(pt 2):166–2-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 1967;47:1345–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Griffen WO, Young VL, Stevenson CC. A prospective comparison of gastric and jejunoileal bypass procedures for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 1977;186(4):500–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MBSAQIP Semiannual Report, July 2017: data from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mason EE, Tang S, Renquist KE, Barnes DT, Cullen JJ, Doherty C, et al. A decade of change in obesity surgery. National Bariatric Surgery Registry (NBSR) contributors. Obes Surg. 1997;7(3):189–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Guidelines for Granting Privileges in Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg. 2003;13:238–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Inabnet WB, Bour E, Carline AM, et al. Joint task force recommendations for credentialing bariatric surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):595–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen NT, Root J, Zainabadi K, et al. Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg. 2005;140:1198–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen NT, Masoomi H, Magno CP, Nguyen XM, Laugenour K, Lane J. Trends in use of bariatric surgery, 2003–2008. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(2):261–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoyt DB, Ko CK, et al. Optimal resources for surgical quality and safety. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2017. p. 141–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen NT, Root J, Zainabadi K, Sabio A, Chalfoux S, Stevens CM, Mavandadi S, Longoria M, Wilson SE. Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg. 2005;140(12):1198–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dimick J, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, Thumma JR, Birkmeyer JD. Bariatric surgery complications before vs. after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to programs of excellence. JAMA. 2013;309(8):792–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Scally CP, Shih T, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Impact of national bariatric surgery center of excellence program on medicare expenditures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(4):708–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacques L, Syrek T, Schafer J, Chin J, Ciccanti M, [Internet] 2012. [Cited 2018 Jan 15]. Decision memo for bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity facility certification requirement (CAG-00250R3). Available from: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=258&NcaName=Bariatric+Surgery+for+the+Treatment+of+Morbid+Obesity&CoverageSelection=National&KeyWord=obesity&KeyWordLookUp=Title&KeyWordSearchType=And&where=index&nca_id=2.

  17. Young MT, Jafari MD, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of bariatric surgery in Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(3):480–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Azugary D, Morton JM. Bariatric surgery outcomes in US accredited vs. non-accredited programs: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(3):469–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bariatric surgery centers [Internet] 2018 Jan 18 [cited 2018 Jan 18]. Available from: https://www.facs.org/search/bariatric-surgery-centers.

  21. MBSAQIP standards manual v3.0. Optimal resources for metabolic and bariatric surgery patient 2019. American College of Surgeons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Fraker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fraker, T. (2019). Building a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Data Registry: Quality Improvement Through Measurement. In: Morton, J., Brethauer, S., DeMaria, E., Kahan, S., Hutter, M. (eds) Quality in Obesity Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25173-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25173-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25172-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25173-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics