Abstract
The notion of data analytics and its use in clinical care of patients continues to accelerate in healthcare whereby providers and facilities alike are migrating from a pay-for-procedure to a pay-for-performance framework. Measurement of data against peer groups is of utmost importance because quality improvement efforts are predicated on the notion that we cannot improve what we do not measure. Successful metabolic and bariatric surgery programs must be supported by a rich data registry as a basis for their local quality improvement efforts which seek to standardize care for the patients they serve. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) collects prospective data and performs risk adjustment following a uniform set of definitional principles regarding patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative events. Due to the inherent rigor in this process, programs can feel confident that they are measured equitably among their peers. The use of standardized data collection promotes immeasurable value for patients, as the data used at both the local and national level supports principles which seek to improve efficiency, quality, and complication rates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
DePalma AF. Earnest armory Codman (1869–1940): a biography. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1961;20:1–10.
Chun J, Bafford AC. History and background of quality measurement. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014;27:5–9.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;3(pt 2):166–2-3.
Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 1967;47:1345–51.
Griffen WO, Young VL, Stevenson CC. A prospective comparison of gastric and jejunoileal bypass procedures for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 1977;186(4):500–9.
MBSAQIP Semiannual Report, July 2017: data from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016.
Mason EE, Tang S, Renquist KE, Barnes DT, Cullen JJ, Doherty C, et al. A decade of change in obesity surgery. National Bariatric Surgery Registry (NBSR) contributors. Obes Surg. 1997;7(3):189–97.
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Guidelines for Granting Privileges in Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg. 2003;13:238–40.
Inabnet WB, Bour E, Carline AM, et al. Joint task force recommendations for credentialing bariatric surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):595–7.
Nguyen NT, Root J, Zainabadi K, et al. Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg. 2005;140:1198–202.
Nguyen NT, Masoomi H, Magno CP, Nguyen XM, Laugenour K, Lane J. Trends in use of bariatric surgery, 2003–2008. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(2):261–6.
Hoyt DB, Ko CK, et al. Optimal resources for surgical quality and safety. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2017. p. 141–6.
Nguyen NT, Root J, Zainabadi K, Sabio A, Chalfoux S, Stevens CM, Mavandadi S, Longoria M, Wilson SE. Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg. 2005;140(12):1198–202.
Dimick J, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, Thumma JR, Birkmeyer JD. Bariatric surgery complications before vs. after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to programs of excellence. JAMA. 2013;309(8):792–9.
Scally CP, Shih T, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Impact of national bariatric surgery center of excellence program on medicare expenditures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(4):708–14.
Jacques L, Syrek T, Schafer J, Chin J, Ciccanti M, [Internet] 2012. [Cited 2018 Jan 15]. Decision memo for bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity facility certification requirement (CAG-00250R3). Available from: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=258&NcaName=Bariatric+Surgery+for+the+Treatment+of+Morbid+Obesity&CoverageSelection=National&KeyWord=obesity&KeyWordLookUp=Title&KeyWordSearchType=And&where=index&nca_id=2.
Young MT, Jafari MD, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, Nguyen NT. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of bariatric surgery in Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(3):480–8.
Azugary D, Morton JM. Bariatric surgery outcomes in US accredited vs. non-accredited programs: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(3):469–77.
Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):60–71.
Bariatric surgery centers [Internet] 2018 Jan 18 [cited 2018 Jan 18]. Available from: https://www.facs.org/search/bariatric-surgery-centers.
MBSAQIP standards manual v3.0. Optimal resources for metabolic and bariatric surgery patient 2019. American College of Surgeons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fraker, T. (2019). Building a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Data Registry: Quality Improvement Through Measurement. In: Morton, J., Brethauer, S., DeMaria, E., Kahan, S., Hutter, M. (eds) Quality in Obesity Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25173-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25173-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25172-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25173-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)