Flood Impact and Risk Assessment on the Road Infrastructure in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Suada DžeboEmail author
  • Ammar ŠarićEmail author
  • Sarah ReevesEmail author
  • Žanesa LjevoEmail author
  • Emina HadžićEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 83)


The transport network is very important for the economic development of each country, enabling the movement of goods and people. Damage on road infrastructure poses a direct threat to people’s safety, causing traffic disruption and economic and social impacts. The paper deals with the impact of floods on road infrastructure in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The paper describes the interaction between the road network and flood as well as their vulnerability, hazards, risks and risk reduction. The main concept and methodological approach for estimating the flood risk for the road transport network have been presented. The proposed climate risk assessment is an indicator-based methodology adjusted to available data.


Flood Road network Vulnerability Hazard Risk 


  1. 1.
    Bles, T., Doef, M.v.d., Buren, R.v., Buma, J., Brolsma, R., Venmans, A., Meerten, J.v.: Investigation of the blue spots in the Netherlands National Highway Network. Deltares (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jenelius, E., Mattsson, L.G.: Road network vulnerability analysis: conceptualization, implementation and application. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 49, 136–147 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cova, T.J., Conger, S.: Transportation hazards. In: Kutz, M. (ed.) Handbook of Transportation Engineering, pp. 17.1–17.24. McGraw Hill, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO office, International standard ISO 55001, Asset management - Management systems - Requirements, Published in Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tacnet, J., Mermet, E.: Analysis of importance of road networks exposed to natural hazards. In: Proceedings of the AGILE 2012 International Conference on Geographic Information Science (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Douven, W., Goichot, M., Verheij, H.: Best practice guidelines for the integrated planning and design of economically sound and environmentally friendly roads in the Mekong Floodplains of Cambodia and Viet Nam: synthesis report. Delft Cluster (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones, J.A., Swanson, F.J., Wemple, B.C., Snyder, K.U.U.: Effects of roads on hydrology, geomorphology, and disturbance patches in stream networks. Conserv. Biol. 14, 76–85 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bles, T., Bessembinder, J., Chevreuil, M., Danielsson, P., Falemo, S., Venmans, A.: ROADAPT Roads for today, adapted for tomorrow. CEDR Transnational Road Research Programme (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bles, T., Ennesser, Y., Fadeuilhe, J.-J., Falemo, S., Lind, B., Mens, M., Ray, M., Sandersen, F.: Risk management for roads in a changing climate (RIMAROCC). Sweden, France, Netherlands, Norway: ERA-NET ROAD (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ennesser, Y.: Quickscan report: A24 motorway in Portugal. CEDR Call 2012: Road owners adapting to climate change, ROADAPT Roads for today, adapted for tomorrow, final version, March 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chauncey, S.: Social benefit versus technological risk. Science 165(3899), 1232–1238 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rogelis, M.C.: Flood Risk in Road Networks. World Bank Group, Washington (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SarajevoSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina
  2. 2.Transportation Research LaboratoryLondonUK

Personalised recommendations