Abstract
After a brief description of the most relevant aspects of hydraulic fracturing technology, the main threats involved in its use for the environment, society, and human health are reviewed. Based on the situation of unconventional reserves in Mexico, an assessment is made of the risks involved in the use of technology for the country. It is concluded that the inappropriate use of fracking technology in non-conventional gas and oil reservoirs in Mexico, heretofore unregulated, may result in devastating impacts on the environment, water, air, and soil. Strong and timely actions are needed to prevent pollution of surface water sources as well as aquifers and groundwater—especially in the northeastern part of Mexico where water is scarce—and the atmosphere and to prevent health problems in neighboring communities and workers. The use of hydraulic fracturing in Mexico ultimately has to do with the availability of water in the regions where it is intended to be made. Consequently, Mexico is not yet prepared for the wide implementation of this technology; there are many issues to be dealt with before reaching a proper starting point.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Absar SM, Boulay A-M, Campa MF, Preston BL, Taylor A (2018) The tradeoff between water and carbon footprints of Barnett Shale gas. J Clean Prod 197:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.140
ACS (American Chemical Society) (2016). The science and technology of hydraulic fracturing (Revision 2). Public Policy Statement. 2015–2018. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/policy/publicpolicies/sustainability/hydraulic-fracturing-statement.html
ACS (American Chemical Society) (2018) News releases. The potential impact of hydraulic fracturing on streams. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/newsreleases/2018/january/potential-impact-of-hydraulic-fracturing-on-streams.html
Adham S, Hussain A, Minier-Matar J, Janson A, Sharma R (2018) Membrane applications and opportunities for water management in the oil and gas industry. Desalination 440:2–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.030
AOGHS (American Oil and Gas Historical) Society (2018) Shooters—a “Fracking history” (2014), Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://aoghs.org/technology/shooters-well-fracking-history/
Apel G, Huang J, Lora M, Oliver K, Zhang I (2015) Hydraulic fracturing: past, present, and future. An analysis of the economic and environmental impacts of “fracking” in the United States. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://franke.uchicago.edu/bigproblems/BPRO29000-2015/Team09-Paper.pdf
API (American Petroleum Institute) (2009) Hydraulic fracturing operations-well construction and integrity guidelines. API Guidance Document HF1, 1st edn (October 2009)
API (American Petroleum Institute) (2010) Water management associated with hydraulic fracturing. API Guidance Document HF2, 1st edn (June 2010)
API (American Petroleum Institute) (2011) Practices for mitigating surface impacts associated with hydraulic fracturing. API Guidance Document HF3, 1st edn (January 2011)
Beleche T, Cintina I (2018) Fracking and risky behaviors: evidence from Pennsylvania. Econ Human Biol 31:69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2018.08.001
Botner C, Townsend-Small A, Nash DB (2016) Elevated methane levels from biogenic coalbed gas in Ohio drinking water wells near shale gas extraction. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.energyindepth.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/UC-Groundwater-Presentation2016.pdf
Botner EC, Townsend-Small A, Nash DB, Xu X, Schimmelmann A, Miller JH (2018) Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio. Environ Monit Assess 190(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6696-1
BP Statistical Review (2016) BP statistical review of world energy 2016. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-full-report.pdf
Castro-Alvarez F, Marsters P, Ponce-de-León-Barido D, Kammen DM (2017) Sustainability lessons from shale development in the United States for Mexico and other emerging unconventional oil and gas developers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82(1):1320–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.082
Chen SS, Sun Y, Tsang DCW, Graham NJD, Ok YS, Feng Y, Li X-D (2017) Potential impact of flowback water from hydraulic fracturing on agricultural soil quality: metal/metalloid bioaccessibility, Microtox bioassay, and enzyme activities. Sci Total Environ 579:1419–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.141
CIA (2015) Country comparison: natural gas production. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2249rank.html
Clancy SA, Worrall F, Davies RJ, Gluyas JG (2018a) An assessment of the footprint and carrying capacity of oil and gas well sites: the implications for limiting hydrocarbon reserves. Sci Total Environ 618:586–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.160
Clancy SA, Worrall F, Davies RJ, Gluyas JG (2018b) The potential for spills and leaks of contaminated liquids from shale gas developments. Sci Total Environ 626:1463–1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.177
Clough E (2018) Environmental justice and fracking: a review. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 3:14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.02.005
CNH (Comisión Nacional de Hidrocarburos, in Spanish National Commission of Hydrocarbons) Exploración y extracción de petróleo y gas de lutitas (Abril de 2018), Recursos Prospectivos (Septiembre de 2017), Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://portal.cnih.cnh.gob.mx/estadisticas.php?lng=es_MX
CONAGUA (2017) Statistics on wáter in México. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://sina.conagua.gob.mx/publicaciones/EAM_i_2017.pdf
CONAGUA (2018) Subdirección General Técnica. Gerencia de Aguas Subterránea. Publication Date: 20150420 (sic). Acuíferos_disponibilidad_2018. Retrieved 15 Oct 2018, from http://sina.conagua.gob.mx/sina/tema.php?tema=acuiferos&ver=mapa
Cotton M, Charnley-Parry I (2018) Beyond opposition and acceptance: examining public perceptions of the environmental and health impacts of unconventional oil and gas extraction. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 3:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.01.001
De Campos VPP, Sansone EC, Silva GFBL (2018) Hydraulic fracturing proppants. Cerâmica 64:219–229
DOE, DOI & EPA (US Department of Energy, Department of the Interior, Environmental Protection Agency) (2014) Federal multiagency collaboration on unconventional oil and gas research: a strategy for research and development (July 2014). https://doi.org/10.1590/0366-69132018643702219
DOF (2013) Ley Federal de Responsabilidad Ambiental. Signed June 05. Published June 07. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5301688&fecha=07/06/2013&print=true
DOF (2014) Ley de la Agencia Nacional de Seguridad Industrial y de Protección al Medio Ambiente del Sector Hidrocarburos. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LANSI_110814.pdf
DOF (2017) Specific guidelines for the protection and conservation of national water during activities of exploration and exploitation of nonconventional reserves). Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5495543&fecha=30/08/2017
Dolan FC, Cath TY, Hogue TS (2018) Assessing the feasibility of using produced water for irrigation in Colorado. Sci Total Environ 640–641:619–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.200
EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration) (2010) EIA’s energy in brief: what is shale gas and why is it important? Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://www.eia.doe.gov/energy_in_brief/about_shale_gas.cfm. (Accessed 10 Aug 2018)
EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration) (2011) World shale gas and shale oil resource assessment. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC
EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration) (2018) Annual energy outlook 2018. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/
Entrekin S, Trainor A, Saiers J, Patterson L, Maloney K, Fargione J, Kiesecker J, Baruch-Mordo S, Konschnik K, Wiseman H, Nicot JP, Ryan JN (2018) Water stress from high-volume hydraulic fracturing potentially threatens aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem services in Arkansas, United States. Env Sci Technol 52(4):2349–2358. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03304
Escalera A (2012) Potencial de recursos no convencionales asociado a plays de aceite y gas de lutitas en México. In Spanish. Conference delivered at Expo Foro Pemex 2012. Mexico City, Mexico. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://docplayer.es/31577134-Potencial-de-recursos-no-convencionales-asociado-a-plays-de-aceite-y-gas-de-lutitas-en-mexico.html
Eyer J (2018) The effect of firm size on fracking safety. Resour Energy Econ 53:101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.02.006
Fernández V (2015) Impacts to health, livelihood continue 1 year after toxic mine spill in Mexico. Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://tucson.com/news/local/border/impacts-to-health-livelihood-continue-year-after-toxic-mine-spill/article_10dd60f8-3b2d-5607-83ad-519012720871.html
Fernández-Badessich M, Hryb DE, Suárez M, Mosse L, Palermo N, Pichon S, Reynolds L (2016) Vaca Muerta Shale—Taming a Giant. Oilfield Rev 28(1):26–39. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.slb.com/~/media/Files/resources/oilfield_review/ors16/Jan2016/04_Vaca_Muerta_Shale.pdf
Foulger GR, Wilson MP, Gluyas JG, Julian BR, Davies RJ (2018) Global review of human-induced earthquakes. Earth Sci Rev 178:438–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.008
Fry M, Briggle A, Kincaid J (2015) Fracking and environmental (in)justice in a Texas city. Ecol Econ 117:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.012
Gourley P, Madonia G (2018) Resource booms and crime: evidence from oil and gas production in Colorado. Resour Energy Econ 54:37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.07.001
Grecu E, Aceleanu MI, Albulescu CT (2018) The economic, social and environmental impact of shale gas exploitation in Romania: a cost-benefit analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 93:691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.026
Gutiérrez-Ojeda C (2017) Fracturación hidráulica y subterránea. Presentation to the Senate of the Republic. Foro de Fracturación Hidráulica de la Explotación de Hidrocarburos en México. October 23. Personal communication to the authors
Hill EL (2018) Shale gas development and infant health: evidence from Pennsylvania. J Health Econ 61:134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.07.004
Jackson RB, Vengosh A, Carey JW, Davies RJ, Darrah TH, O’Sullivan F, Pétron G (2014) The environmental costs and benefits of fracking. Annu Rev Environ Resour 39(1):327–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-031113-144051
Jia C (2017) Breakthrough and significance of unconventional oil and gas to classical petroleum geology theory. Petrol Explor Develop 44(1):1–10
Jiménez S, Micó MM, Arnaldos M, Medina F, Contreras S (2018) State of the art of produced water treatment. Chemosphere 192:186–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.139
King GE, Durham D (2015) Environmental aspects of hydraulic fracturing: what are the facts? In: Hydraulic fracturing: environmental issues, vol 1216 (Chap 1). ACS Symposium Series, pp 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2015-1216.ch001
Kirkman R, Arson CF, Stewart L, Harris R, Francis A (2017) The risks of hydraulic fracturing and the responsibilities of engineers. Elem Sci Anth 5:17. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.218
Kovats S, Depledge M, Haines A, Fleming LE, Wilkinson P, Shonkoff SB, Scovronick N (2014) The health implications of fracking. The Lancet 383(9919):757–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62700-2
Le M-T (2018) An assessment of the potential for the development of shale gas industry in countries outside of North America. Heliyon 4 (2018) e 00516.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.00516
Ley Federal de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LFTAIP_270117.pdf
LGEEPA (2016) Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://paotgto.gob.mx/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Ley-General-del-Equilibrio-Ecologico-y-Protecci%C3%B3n-al-Ambiente-Ambiente-1.pdf
Liden T, Santos IC, Hildenbrand ZL, Schug KA (2018) Treatment modalities for the reuse of produced waste from oil and gas development. Sci Total Environ 643:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.386
López-Bárcenas F (2018) Despojo. La segunda desamortización de la tierra. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://www.lopezbarcenas.org/tags/despojo
Luís S, Vauclair C-M, Lima ML (2018) Raising awareness of climate change causes? Cross-national evidence for the normalization of societal risk perception of climate change. Environ Sci Policy 80:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.015
McClung MR, Moran MD (2018) Understanding and mitigating impacts of unconventional oil and gas development on land-use and ecosystem services in the U.S. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 3:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.03.002
McLean B (2018) The next financial crisis lurks underground. Opinion. The New York Times. Retrieved 21 Sept 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/opinion/the-next-financial-crisis-lurks-underground.html
Merrill TW, Schizer DM (2013) The shale oil and gas revolution, hydraulic fracturing, and water contamination: a regulatory strategy. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/SchizerMerrill_MLR.pdf
Metze T (2018) Framing the future of fracking: discursive lock-in or energy degrowth in the Netherlands? J Clean Prod 197:1737–1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.158
Mistré M, Crénes M, Hafner M (2018) Shale gas production costs: historical developments and outlook. Energy Strategy Rev 20:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2018.01.001
Montcoudiol N, Isherwood C, Gunning A, Kelly T, Younger PL (2017) Shale gas impacts on groundwater resources: understanding the behavior of a shallow aquifer around a fracking site in Poland. Energy Procedia 125:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.083
O’Connor CD, Fredericks K (2018) Citizen perceptions of fracking: the risks and opportunities of natural gas development in Canada. Energy Res Soc Sci 42:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.005
Onishi VC, Fraga ES, Reyes-Labarta JA, Caballero JA (2018) Desalination of shale gas wastewater: thermal and membrane applications for zero-liquid discharge. In: Gnaneswar Gude V (ed) Emerging technologies for sustainable desalination handbook (pp 399–431). Butterworth-Heinemann
Paulik LB, Hobbie KA, Rohlman D, Smith BW, Scott RP, Kincl L, Haynes EN, Anderson KA (2018) Environmental and individual PAH exposures near rural natural gas extraction. Environ Pollut 241:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.010
PEMEX (2017) Visión Estratégica de Negocio en PEP. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from www.pemex.pepcom.mx/
Petición de acceso a la información # 1857500000714 (Request of access to information No. 1857500000714, in Spanish) (2014) Mexico D.F
Proceso. Activistas del Movimiento en Defensa de la Madre Tierra y de la Vida se manifiestan contra el fracking. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.proceso.com.mx/545862/
Rester E, Warner SD (2016) A review of drinking water contamination associated with hydraulic fracturing. In: Kaden D, Rose T (eds) Environmental and health issues in unconventional oil and gas development (Ch 4). Elsevier, pp 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804111-6.00004-2
Roach T (2018) Oklahoma earthquakes and the price of oil. Energy Policy 121:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.040
SENER (Secretaría de Energía) (2016) Prospectiva de Gas Natural 2016–2030. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.gob.mx/sener
SENER (Secretaría de Energía) (2018a) Estadísticas e indicadores de hidrocarburos. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.gob.mx/sener
SENER (Secretaría de Energía) (2018b) Prontuario Estadístico Julio 2018. In Spanish. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://www.gob.mx/sener
Silva-Ontiveros L, Munrob PG, Melo-Zurita ML (2018) Proyectos de Muerte: energy justice conflicts on Mexico’s unconventional gas frontier. Extr Ind Soc 5(4):481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.06.010
Sovacool BK (2014) Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 37:249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.068
Stretesky PB, Long MA, McKie RE, Aryee FA (2018) Does oil and gas development increase crime within UK local authorities? Extr Ind Soc 5(3):356–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.03.006
Umich (University of Michigan) (2013) The application of hydraulic fracturing technologies to michigan oil and gas recovery. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from http://graham.umich.edu/media/files/HF-02-Technology.pdf
USGS (United States Geological Service) (2018) Energy multimedia gallery, USGS, energy resources program. Retrieved 15 Aug 2018, from https://energy.usgs.gov/GeneralInfo/HelpfulResources/MultimediaGallery/HydraulicFracturingGallery.aspx
Vengosh A, Warner N, Jackson R, Darrah T (2013) The effects of shale gas exploration and hydraulic fracturing on the quality of water resources in the United States. Procedia Earth and Planet Sci 7:863–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2013.03.213
Vieth-Hillebrand A, Wilke FDH, Schmid FE, Munder W, Zhu Y, Francu J (2017) Characterizing the variability in chemical composition of flowback water—results from laboratory studies. Energy Procedia 125:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.146
Watterson A, Dinan W (2018) Public health and unconventional oil and gas extraction including fracking: global lessons from a Scottish government review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(4):675. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040675
Williams PJ, Reeder M, Pekney NJ, Risk D, Osborne J, McCawley M (2018) Atmospheric impacts of a natural gas development within the urban context of Morgantown, West Virginia. Sci Total Environ 639:406–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.422
Wilton J (2015) Mexico’s ‘worst environmental disaster in modern times.’ New Internationalist. Retrieved July 15, 2018, from https://newint.org/features/web-exclusive/2015/01/08/mexico-environment-disaster
Yao M, Woo YC, Tijing LD, Choi J-S, Shon HK (2018) Effects of volatile organic compounds on water recovery from produced water via vacuum membrane distillation. Desalination 440:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.11.012
Zou C, Yang Z, Zhang G, Hou L, Zhu R, Tao S, Yuan X, Dong D, Wang Y, Guo Q, Wang L, Bi H, Li D, Wu N (2014) Conventional and unconventional petroleum “orderly accumulation”: concept and practical significance. Petrol Explor Dev 41(1):14–30
Acknowledgements
Authors acknowledge the review of this chapter to Dr. Richard Paul Philp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Villalobos-Hiriart, A., Navarro-Frómeta, A., Gómez-Durán, P.A., Alonso-Pippo, W., Durán-Domínguez-de-Bazúa, M.C., Jiménez-Vásquez, A.M. (2020). Implications of Hydraulic Fracturing of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources in Mexico. In: Otazo-Sánchez, E., Navarro-Frómeta, A., Singh, V. (eds) Water Availability and Management in Mexico. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 88. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24962-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24962-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24961-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24962-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)