Abstract
The impact of introducing motorized transportation has been so big that explanations have to found in space-economy. The part of that discipline called location theory provides good answers by stressing the radical consequences of moving from animal transportation, which involves increasing marginal transportation costs, to relay transportation involving constant marginal transportation costs and to motorized transportation involving decreasing marginal transportation costs. It can be proven that animal transportation favors the dispersal of economic activities, while motorized transportation makes polarization almost inevitable. However, a theoretical question remains: In order to get polarization, there must exist a minimal level of space-friction; however, history has shown that the more transportation costs decreased and space-friction was overcome, the more the magnitude of the attractive forces decreased, and the more they decreased, the more polarization and urbanization triumphed, which is a true paradox. Seven explanations of that important paradox are hereby presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Tellier and Polanski (1989).
- 4.
Ibid.
- 5.
Wilhelm Launhardt, op. cit.
- 6.
Kei-Mu Yi has stressed the fact that the decrease of space-friction generally favors vertical specialization, each sector giving birth to a large number of interrelated specialized firms that exchange with other specialized firms. In the end, the decrease in space-friction is counterbalanced by a significant increase in transportation, and space-friction still matters instead of becoming irrelevant. See Yi (2003).
- 7.
Hohenberg and Lees (1985, 200–205).
- 8.
Johnston (1980, 111).
- 9.
Some explanations of the basic paradox of space-economy linked to the spatial competition are provided by the general equilibrium models of the New Economic Geography (NEG) assuming the existence of increasing returns. See Combes et al. (2006).
- 10.
Braudel (1974, 400).
- 11.
The tunnel effect is also observed in the computer society. The development of worldwide meta-networks often leaves aside whole marginal areas. See Castels (1996).
- 12.
- 13.
Petri (1993).
References
Bairoch, P. (1988). Cities and economic development, from the dawn of history to the present. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Braudel, F. (1974). Capitalism and material life, 1400-1800. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Castels, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Chen, P.-C., Hansen, P., Jaumard, B., & Tuy, H. (1992). Weber’s problem with attraction and repulsion. Journal of Regional Science, 32(1992), 467–486.
Combes, P.-P., Mayer, T., & Thisse, J.-F. (2006). Économie géographique. L’intégration des régions et des nations (397 p). Paris, Economica.
Hohenberg, P. M., & Lees, L. H. (1985). The making of urban Europe, 1000-1950 (398 p). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Johnston, R. J. (1980). City and society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Kuhn, H. W., & Kuenne, R. E. (1962). An efficient algorithm for the numerical solution of the generalized Weber problem in spatial economics. Journal of Regional Science, 4, 21–34.
Launhardt, W. (1882). Die Bestimmung des zweckmassigsten Standortes einer gewerblichen Anlage. Zeitschrift des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure, 26, 106–115.
Petri, P. A. (1993). The East Asian trading bloc: An analytical theory. In J. A. Frankel & M. Kahler (Eds.), Regionalism and rivalry. Japan and the US in Pacific Asia (pp. 21–48). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tellier, L.-N. (1972). The Weber problem: Solution and interpretation. Geographical Analysis, 4, 215–233.
Tellier, L.-N. (1985). Économie spatiale: rationalité économique de l’espace habité (280 p). Chicoutimi, Quebec: Gaëtan Morin éditeur.
Tellier, L.-N., & Polanski, B. (1989). The Weber problem: Frequency of different solution types and extension to repulsive forces and dynamic processes. Journal of Regional Science, 29(3), 387–405.
van der Woude, A. M., Hayami, A., & de Vries, J. (1990). Urbanization in history (p. 7). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Weber, A. (1957). Alfred Weber’s theory of the location of industries (C. J. Friedrich, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (original version published in 1909).
Yi, K.-M. (2003). Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade? Journal of Political Economy, 111(1), 52–102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tellier, LN. (2019). Understanding the Impact of Motorized Transportation. In: Urban World History. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24842-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24842-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24841-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24842-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)