Skip to main content

Understanding the Impact of Motorized Transportation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban World History
  • 643 Accesses

Abstract

The impact of introducing motorized transportation has been so big that explanations have to found in space-economy. The part of that discipline called location theory provides good answers by stressing the radical consequences of moving from animal transportation, which involves increasing marginal transportation costs, to relay transportation involving constant marginal transportation costs and to motorized transportation involving decreasing marginal transportation costs. It can be proven that animal transportation favors the dispersal of economic activities, while motorized transportation makes polarization almost inevitable. However, a theoretical question remains: In order to get polarization, there must exist a minimal level of space-friction; however, history has shown that the more transportation costs decreased and space-friction was overcome, the more the magnitude of the attractive forces decreased, and the more they decreased, the more polarization and urbanization triumphed, which is a true paradox. Seven explanations of that important paradox are hereby presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Weber and Pick’s contributions are found in Weber (1957). See also Launhardt (1882), Kuhn and Kuenne (1962), Tellier (1972).

  2. 2.

    Tellier (1985) and Chen et al. (1992). The attraction–repulsion problem has opened the way to the New Economic Geography developed by Paul R. Krugman, Anthony J. Venables, Masahisa Fujita, Gianmarco Ottaviano, Jacques-François Thisse, and others.

  3. 3.

    Tellier and Polanski (1989).

  4. 4.

    Ibid.

  5. 5.

    Wilhelm Launhardt, op. cit.

  6. 6.

    Kei-Mu Yi has stressed the fact that the decrease of space-friction generally favors vertical specialization, each sector giving birth to a large number of interrelated specialized firms that exchange with other specialized firms. In the end, the decrease in space-friction is counterbalanced by a significant increase in transportation, and space-friction still matters instead of becoming irrelevant. See Yi (2003).

  7. 7.

    Hohenberg and Lees (1985, 200–205).

  8. 8.

    Johnston (1980, 111).

  9. 9.

    Some explanations of the basic paradox of space-economy linked to the spatial competition are provided by the general equilibrium models of the New Economic Geography (NEG) assuming the existence of increasing returns. See Combes et al. (2006).

  10. 10.

    Braudel (1974, 400).

  11. 11.

    The tunnel effect is also observed in the computer society. The development of worldwide meta-networks often leaves aside whole marginal areas. See Castels (1996).

  12. 12.

    Bairoch (1988) and van der Woude et al. (1990).

  13. 13.

    Petri (1993).

References

  • Bairoch, P. (1988). Cities and economic development, from the dawn of history to the present. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1974). Capitalism and material life, 1400-1800. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castels, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P.-C., Hansen, P., Jaumard, B., & Tuy, H. (1992). Weber’s problem with attraction and repulsion. Journal of Regional Science, 32(1992), 467–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combes, P.-P., Mayer, T., & Thisse, J.-F. (2006). Économie géographique. L’intégration des régions et des nations (397 p). Paris, Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenberg, P. M., & Lees, L. H. (1985). The making of urban Europe, 1000-1950 (398 p). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1980). City and society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, H. W., & Kuenne, R. E. (1962). An efficient algorithm for the numerical solution of the generalized Weber problem in spatial economics. Journal of Regional Science, 4, 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launhardt, W. (1882). Die Bestimmung des zweckmassigsten Standortes einer gewerblichen Anlage. Zeitschrift des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure, 26, 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petri, P. A. (1993). The East Asian trading bloc: An analytical theory. In J. A. Frankel & M. Kahler (Eds.), Regionalism and rivalry. Japan and the US in Pacific Asia (pp. 21–48). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellier, L.-N. (1972). The Weber problem: Solution and interpretation. Geographical Analysis, 4, 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellier, L.-N. (1985). Économie spatiale: rationalité économique de l’espace habité (280 p). Chicoutimi, Quebec: Gaëtan Morin éditeur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellier, L.-N., & Polanski, B. (1989). The Weber problem: Frequency of different solution types and extension to repulsive forces and dynamic processes. Journal of Regional Science, 29(3), 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Woude, A. M., Hayami, A., & de Vries, J. (1990). Urbanization in history (p. 7). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. (1957). Alfred Weber’s theory of the location of industries (C. J. Friedrich, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (original version published in 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, K.-M. (2003). Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade? Journal of Political Economy, 111(1), 52–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc-Normand Tellier .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tellier, LN. (2019). Understanding the Impact of Motorized Transportation. In: Urban World History. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24842-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics