Skip to main content

The Role of Laparoscopy in the Management of Bowel Obstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1241 Accesses

Abstract

Though laparotomy is the traditional intervention for adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO), laparoscopy is becoming increasingly accepted and utilized and offers patient advantages in selected cases. Patient history and preoperative imaging are often helpful in determining if the patient is a candidate for a laparoscopic approach. During laparoscopic exploration, initial peritoneal access should be attained away from prior scars, and the bowel should ideally be examined from distal to proximal to identify the point of obstruction, with careful handling of fragile and dilated bowel. Critical goals for surgery include identification and relief of the point of obstruction, resection of nonviable bowel, and avoidance of inadvertent enterotomy. Conversion to open surgery should be undertaken expeditiously when it is determined that one of these goals cannot be safely accomplished laparoscopically. Many studies, though retrospective and not randomized, suggest improved early morbidity with laparoscopic exploration, though with high rates of conversion to open surgery. Conflicting results exist on whether open or laparoscopic exploration carries a higher risk of iatrogenic enterotomy. Further studies are needed to assess how laparoscopic adhesiolysis will impact long-term recurrence SBO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bastug DF, Trammell SW, Boland JP, Mantz EP, Tiley EH. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1(4):259–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Connor DB, Winter DC. The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: a review of over 2,000 cases. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Foster NM, McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Small bowel obstruction: a population-based appraisal. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(2):170–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Byrne J, Saleh F, Ambrosini L, Quereshy F, Jackson TD, Okrainec A. Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(9):2525–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davies SW, Gillen JR, Guidry CA, Newhook TE, Pope NH, Hranjec T, et al. A comparative analysis between laparoscopic and open adhesiolysis at a tertiary care center. Am Surg. 2014;80(3):261–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dindo D, Schafer M, Muller MK, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D. Laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction: the reason for conversion matters. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(4):792–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Behman R, Nathens AB, Byrne JP, Mason S, Look Hong N, Karanicolas PJ. Laparoscopic surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction is associated with a higher risk of bowel injury: a population-based analysis of 8584 patients. Ann Surg. 2017;266(3):489–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiggins T, Markar SR, Harris A. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(12):3432–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao S, Tanaka E, Matsui Y, Ikeda A, Murakami T, Okumoto T, et al. Does laparoscopic adhesiolysis decrease the risk of recurrent symptoms in small bowel obstruction? A propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(12):5348–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pei KY, Asuzu D, Davis KA. Will laparoscopic lysis of adhesions become the standard of care? Evaluating trends and outcomes in laparoscopic management of small-bowel obstruction using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(5):2180–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel R, Borad NP, Merchant AM. Comparison of outcomes following laparoscopic and open treatment of emergent small bowel obstruction: an 11-year analysis of ACS NSQIP. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(12):4900–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela H. Kuhnen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuhnen, A.H. (2020). The Role of Laparoscopy in the Management of Bowel Obstruction. In: Sylla, P., Kaiser, A., Popowich, D. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Colorectal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24812-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24812-3_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24811-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24812-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics