Skip to main content

Decolonizing Teacher Education in Immersion Contexts: Working with Space, Place and Boundaries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Redefining Teaching Competence through Immersive Programs

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss how, although a number of higher education institutions in the Global North are attempting to decolonize and Indigenize (e.g., Dei, 2007), many of their practices continue to be colonizing (Tuck & Yang, 2012) unwittingly harming the bodies and minds of the Other (Thiong’o, 1987). Drawing on theory developed through our long-term engagement with pre-service teachers in a course with a critical immersive component, we propose that (a) educators explicitly acknowledge the loci of their enunciation and to use this as a starting point for developing educational relationships ‘otherwise’ and (b) learning with and alongside the Other is a deeply ethical venture requiring a decolonizing pedagogy that can be conceptualized as working within the places, spaces and boundaries of critical interculturalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Our use of the term ‘settler’ in this context is to highlight that settler colonialism (i) is different to others forms of colonialism, (ii) involved appropriation of land to establish new and improved versions of the societies they left, (iii) is not temporarily contained in the arrival of the settler but is reasserted each day of occupation, and (iv) is therefore a structure not at event (Tuck & Yang, 2012, p. 5).

  2. 2.

    ‘Intergenerational trauma’ is ‘The cumulative impact of trauma experienced by both children and their parents as a result of Canada’s residential school policy continues to have consequences for subsequent generations of children’ (Menzies, 2010, p. 67).

  3. 3.

    We use whiteness not as an essential category, but as a concept with ‘a constantly shifting boundary separating those who are entitled to have certain privileges from those whose exploitation and vulnerability to violence is justified by their not being white’ (Kivel, 1996, p. 19).

  4. 4.

    In doing this we do not assume homogeneity across all colonizing European countries. However, since the focus of this chapter is on English language and literacy education, we focus on the British experience.

References

  • Agnew, J. (2011). Space and place. In J. Agnew & D. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of geographical knowledge (pp. 316–330). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Andreotti, V. (2014). Critical and transnational literacies in international development and global citizenship education. SISYPHUS Journal of Education,2(3), 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamber, P. (2016). Transformative education through international service-learning. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. M., & Bennett, M. J. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: An integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In D. Landis, J. Bennett, & M. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (3rd ed., pp. 147–165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (2004 [1994]). The location of culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringle, R. G., Hatcher, J. A., & Jones, S. G. (Eds.). (2011). International service learning: Conceptual frameworks and research. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou (2nd ed., R. Gregory Smith, Trans.). Edinburgh, UK: T. & T. Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cote-Meek, S. (2014). Colonized classrooms: Racism, trauma and resistance in post-secondary education. Black Point, NS: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, K., & Westbrook, R. (2013). Local and global—Conflicting perspectives? The place of overseas practicum in preservice teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,41(1), 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Assessing intercultural competence in study abroad students. In M. Byram & A. Feng (Eds.), Living and studying abroad: Research and practice (pp. 232–256). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiAngelo, R. (2011). White fragility. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy,3(3), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerr, N. M. (2012). Do ‘global citizens’ need the parochial cultural other? Discourse of immersion in study abroad and learning-by-doing. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education,43(2), 224–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. D. (2012). Transmodernity and interculturality: An interpretation from the perspective of philosophy of liberation. TRANSMODERNITY: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(3), 28–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, G. (2014). Ethical communication and intercultural responsibility: A philosophical perspective. Language and Intercultural Communication,14(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox O’Mahony, L. (2006). Conceptualising home: Theories, laws and policies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, O., Kleifgen, J. A., & Falchi, L. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals. Equity Matters: Research Review no. 1. Teachers College Columbia University. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524002.pdf.

  • Gorski, P. C. (2008). Good intentions are not enough: A decolonizing intercultural education. Intercultural Education,19(6), 515–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, R. (2011). Decolonizing post-colonial studies and paradigms of political-economy: Transmodernity, decolonial thinking, and global coloniality. TRANSMODERNITY: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(1), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardado, M. (2002). Loss and maintenance of first language skills: Case studies of hispanic families in Vancouver. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadiennedes Langues Vivantes,58(3), 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1994). The business of international business is culture. International Business Review,3(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, A., & Rea, T. (2011). Transformative learning and identity formation on the ‘smiling coast’ of West Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education,27, 552–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of International Education. (2015). Open doors report on International Educational Exchange. https://www.iie.org/Why-IIE/Announcements/2015/11/2015-11-16-Open-Doors-Data. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.

  • Jones, M. (2009). Phase space: Geography, relational thinking, and beyond. Progress in Human Geography,33(4), 487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehl, K., & Morris, J. (2008). Differences in global-mindedness between short-term and semester-long study abroad participants at selected private universities. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 15, 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiely, R. (2005). A transformative learning model for service-learning: A longitudinal case study. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,12(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivel, P. (1996). Uprooting racism: How white people can work for racial justice. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krabill, R. (2012). American sentimentalism and the production of global citizens. Contexts,11(4), 52–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, J. (2012). Putting space in place: Philosophical topography and relational geography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,30, 226–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., & Griffiths, H. (2014). Relating to the ‘other’: Transformative, intercultural learning in post-colonial contexts. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44(6), 938–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., & Pirbhai-Illich, F. (2015). Service learning as post-colonial discourse: Active global citizenship. In R. Reynolds, D. Bradbery, J. Brown, K. Carroll, D. Donnelly, K. Ferguson-Patrick, & S. Macqueen (Eds.), Contesting and constructing international perspectives in global education (pp. 135–150). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBrien, J. L. (2008). The world at America’s doorstep: Service learning in preparation to teach global students. Journal of Transformative Education,6(4), 270–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. (2003). Making spaces: Teacher workplace topologies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society,11(3), 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, P. (2010). Intergenerational trauma from a mental health perspective. Native Social Work Journal,7, 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. (2013). On pluriversality. Walter Mignolo: Thoughts on modernity/coloniality, geopolitics of knowledge, border thinking, pluriversality, and the decolonial option [Online]. http://waltermignolo.com/on-pluriversality/. Accessed 25 Oct 2018.

  • Mills, C. W. (2007). White ignorance. In S. Sullivan & N. Tuana (Eds.), Race and epistemologies of ignorance (pp. 11–38). New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. (2008). Traditional vs. critical service-learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two models. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,14(2), 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2015). The white possessive: Property, power, and indigenous sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review,66(1), 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirbhai-Illich, F. (2013). Crossing borders: At the nexus of critical service-learning, literacy, and social justice. Waikato Journal of Education. Te Haukata Matauranga O Waikato, 18(2), 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirbhai-Illich, F., Pete, S., & Martin, F. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally responsive pedagogy: Working towards decolonization, indigeneity and interculturalism. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1985). Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoffham, S., & Barnes, J. (2009). Transformational experiences and deep learning: The impact of an intercultural study visit to India on UK initial teacher education students. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy,35(3), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, T., Giles, D., & Cruz, N. (1999). Service-learning: A movement’s pioneers reflect on its origins, practice and future. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S. (2014). Good white people: The problem with middle-class white anti-racism. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TRC. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. www.trc.ca.

  • Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society,1, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verjee, B. (2012). Critical race feminism: A transformative vision for service-learning engagement. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship,5(1), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemach-Bersin, T. (2007). Global citizenship & study abroad: It’s all about U.S. Critical Literacy: Theories and Practices, 1(2), 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatima Pirbhai-Illich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pirbhai-Illich, F., Martin, F. (2019). Decolonizing Teacher Education in Immersion Contexts: Working with Space, Place and Boundaries. In: Martin, D., Smolcic, E. (eds) Redefining Teaching Competence through Immersive Programs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24788-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24788-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24787-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24788-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics