Voices Together: Perspectives from the Host and Sojourner Communities



Much of the literature on study abroad focuses on sojourners from prosperous countries of the Global North. Missing from the conversation is the perspective of the host community, often in the Global South. If one of the goals of study abroad is to develop equitable multicultural partnerships, the host perspective must be solicited and understood (Barros, 2016; d’Arlach, Sánchez, & Fueur, 2009; Martin & Griffiths, 2012; Ouma & Dimaras, 2013). To this end, we included the voices of participants from both host and sojourning communities in a US–Ecuador university partnership focused on language teacher education. Using qualitative data, we examined participants’ intercultural development through opportunities for cultural dialogues that positioned one another as equal partners in relationships characterized by mutual respect, reciprocity, and a deepening cultural understanding.


  1. Alred, G., & Byram, M. (2002). Becoming an intercultural mediator: A longitudinal study of residence abroad. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23(5), 339–352. Scholar
  2. Anderson, K. T. (2009). Applying positioning theory to the analysis of classroom interactions: Mediating micro-identities, macro-kinds, and ideologies of knowing. Linguistics and Education, 20(4), 291–310.Google Scholar
  3. Barge, J. K., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2008). Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 251–265. Scholar
  4. Barros, S. R. (2016). Power, privilege, and study abroad as “spectacle”. In J. Rahatzad (Ed.), Internationalizing teaching and teacher education for equity: Engaging alternative knowledges across ideological borders. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Bolin, M. (2001). Consumerism and U.S. study abroad. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(3), 182–200.Google Scholar
  6. Breen, M. (2012). Privileged migration: American undergraduates, study abroad, academic tourism. Critical Arts, 26(1), 82–102. Scholar
  7. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Philadelphia; Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  8. Canagarajah, A. S. (2013 [2012]). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cowan, D. L., Torrie, M., Hausafus, C. O., & Swanson, N. W. (2004). Collaboration and reciprocity in education (CARE): Partnership models in local and international settings. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 96(3), 35.Google Scholar
  10. d’Arlach, L., Sánchez, B., & Fueur, R. (2009). Voices from the community: A case for reciprocity in service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Fall, 5–16.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeKeyser, R. (2010). Monitoring processes in Spanish as a second language during a study abroad program. Foreign Language Annals, 43(1), 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dervin, F., & Gross, Z. (2016). Intercultural competence in education: Alternative approaches for different times. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Scholar
  14. de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorski, P. (2008). Good intentions are not enough: A decolonizing intercultural education. Intercultural Education, 19(6), 515–525. Scholar
  17. Holzman, L. (2009). Vygotsky at work and play. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, J. (2015). Becoming interculturally competent: Theory to practice in international education. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 48(2015), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaeger, K., & Gram, M. (2017). “Totally different standards”: Consumer orientation in study abroad contexts. Higher Education, 74(1), 3–47. Scholar
  20. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Martin, F., & Griffiths, H. (2012). Power and representation: A postcolonial reading of global partnerships and teacher development through North–South study visits. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 907–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N., & McManus, K. (2017). Anglophone students abroad: Identity, social relationships and language learning. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  24. Ogden, A. (2007). The view from the veranda: Understanding today’s colonial student. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 15, 35.Google Scholar
  25. Ouma, B., & Dimaras, H. (2013). Views from the global south: Exploring how student volunteers from the global north can achieve sustainable impact in global health. Globalization and Health, 9(1), 32. Scholar
  26. Pasterick, M. (2015). Language and culture learning abroad: Mediating pre-service world languages teachers’ development of interculturality. Retrieved from
  27. Reilly, D., & Senders, S. (2009). Becoming the change we want to see: Critical study abroad for a tumultuous world. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 18, 241.Google Scholar
  28. Smolcic, E. (2011). Becoming a culturally responsive teacher: Personal transformation and shifting identities during an immersion experience abroad. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Trainor, A., & Bouchard, K. A. (2013). Exploring and developing reciprocity in research design. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(8), 986–1003. Scholar
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wertsch, J. (1994). The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1(4), 202–208.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Applied LinguisticsThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.Universidad de CuencaCuencaEcuador

Personalised recommendations