Abstract
Welfare to the elderly is becoming more unequally distributed due to tax breaks for privately provided elderly care. The chapter examines the so-called Rut deduction that can be used for home care as well as at retirement homes. The Rut deduction means that certain groups benefit from leaving the publicly funded system and instead pay their elderly care with a mixture of private and state money. These groups may have a reduced interest in the functioning of the public elderly care. It also implies something remarkable: if the private cost of a certain amount of home care is lower in the privately funded system than in the publicly funded system, then the privately funded system is actually more publicly funded than the publicly funded system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bowman, J. R., & Cole, A. M. (2009). Do working mothers oppress other women? The Swedish “maid debate” and the welfare state politics of gender equality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,35(1), 157–184.
Branco, R., & Costa, E. (2018). The golden age of tax expenditures: Fiscal welfare and inequality in Portugal (1989–2011). New Political Economy. https://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/doi/pdf/10.1080/13563467.2018.1526264%3FneedAccess=true.
Carbonnier, C. (2015). The political economy of household services in Europe. New York: Springer.
Gregson, N., & Lowe, M. (2005). Servicing the middle classes: Class, gender and waged domestic work in contemporary Britain. London: Routledge.
Faricy, C. G. (2015). Welfare for the wealthy: Parties, social spending, and inequality in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johansson, L., Sundström, G., & Hassing, L. B. (2003). State provision down, offspring’s up: The reverse substitution of old-age care in Sweden. Ageing & Society,23(3), 269–280.
Morel, N. (2015). Servants for the knowledge-based economy? The political economy of domestic services in Europe. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society,22(2), 170–192.
Nyberg, A. (2013). RUT-avdraget–subventionering av vit sysselsättning eller av höginkomsttagares fritid? Fronesis, 42–43, 114–130.
Platzer, E. (2006). From private solutions to public responsibility and back again: The new domestic services in Sweden. Gender & History,18(2), 211–221.
Szebehely, M., & Trydegård, G. B. (2007). Omsorgstjänster för äldre och funktionshindrade: skilda villkor, skilda trender? Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift,14, 197–219.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lapidus, J. (2019). Half-Private Elderly Care. In: The Quest for a Divided Welfare State. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24784-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24784-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24783-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24784-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)