Skip to main content

Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Epidemiology and Causes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty

Abstract

The reported rates of revision after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) range from approximately 2.5% to 15%. The primary forms of failure are loose talar component, loose tibial component, dislocation, instability, misalignment, deep infection, fracture (near implant), pain, and defective polyethylene. The main risk factors for revision TAA (RTAA) are inadequate patient selection, deficient surgeon experience, obesity (body mass index [BMI] >30), posttraumatic and end-stage osteoarthritis, poor restoration of bone stock, inadequate prosthetic device selection (poor implant features), insufficient control of risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (age < 65 years, BMI < 19, BMI >30, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, inflammatory arthritis, peripheral vascular disease, chronic lung disease, hypothyroidism, previous ankle surgery, wound healing problems more than 14 days postoperatively), and ipsilateral hindfoot fusion. Loosening happens more commonly in fixed-bearing designs than in the mobile-bearing designs. Gamma-sterilized polyethylene inserts experience fatigue damage or fracture in vivo, resulting in the need for revision. The Salto mobile design has a higher rate of revision than the Salto-Talaris design; however, the reported frequency of revision for the Salto mobile version and Salto-Talaris TAAs is lower than that reported for the Agility and STAR systems without obvious selection (inventor) or publication (conflict of interest) bias. The reported overall 10-year survival of the Ankle Evolutive System (AES) prosthesis, a mobile-bearing TAA evolved from the Buechel Pappas model TAA, is lower than with other designs, particularly due to cyst lesions. At 20 months’ follow-up, the two-component Infinity prosthesis had shown a high early revision rate due to tibial component loosening compared with other implant systems. The INBONE I prosthesis is at a significantly higher risk of implant failure than the INBONE II, STAR (Swedish Total Ankle Replacement), and Salto-Talaris prostheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Prissel MA, Roukis TS. Incidence of revision after primary implantation of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement system: A systematic review. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30:237–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Myerson MS, Aiyer AA, Ellington JK. Revision total ankle replacement. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2015;5(2):e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roukis TS, Elliott AD. Incidence of revision after primary implantation of the Salto ® mobile version and Salto Talaris ™ total ankle prostheses: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54:311–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Labek G, Todorov S, Iovanescu L, Stoica CI, Böhler N. Outcome after total ankle arthroplasty-results and findings from worldwide arthroplasty registers. Int Orthop. 2013;37:1677–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Noelle S, Egidy CC, Cross MB, Gebauer M, Klauser W. Complication rates after total ankle arthroplasty in one hundred consecutive prostheses. Int Orthop. 2013;37:1789–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai WC, Arshi A, Ghorbanifarajzadeh A, Williams JR, Soohoo NF. Incidence and predictors of early complications following primary and revision total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 . pii: S1268-7731(18)30325-4; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2018.10.009.

  7. Law TY, Sabeh KG, Rosas S, Hubbard Z, Altajar S, Roche MW. Trends in total ankle arthroplasty and revisions in the Medicare database. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(7):112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sadoghi P, Roush G, Kastner N, Leithner A, Sommitsch C, Goswami T. Failure modes for total ankle arthroplasty: a statistical analysis of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:1361–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horisberger M, Henninger HB, Valderrabano V, Barg A. Bone augmentation for revision total ankle arthroplasty with large bone defects. Acta Orthop. 2015;86:412–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patton D, Kiewiet N, Brage M. Infected total ankle arthroplasty: risk factors and treatment options. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:626–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Demetracopoulos CA, Adams SB Jr, Queen RM, DeOrio JK, Nunley JA 2nd, Easley ME. Effect of age on outcomes in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:871–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Steck JK, Schuberth JM, Christensen JC, Luu CA. Revision total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2017;34:541–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Iorio A, Viste A, Fessy MH, Besse JL. The AES total ankle arthroplasty analysis of failures and survivorship at ten years. Int Orthop. 2017;41:2525–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elliott AD, Roukis TS. Anterior incision offloading for primary and revision total ankle replacement: a comparative analysis of two techniques. Open Orthop J. 2017;11:678–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Althoff A, Cancienne JM, Cooper MT, Werner BC. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic ankle joint infection: an analysis of 6977 total ankle arthroplasties. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57:269–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sansosti LE, Van JC, Meyr AJ. Effect of obesity on total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review of postoperative complications requiring surgical revision. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57:353–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gramlich Y, Neun O, Klug A, Buckup J, Stein T, Neumann A, Fischer S, Abt HP, Hoffmann R. Total ankle replacement leads to high revision rates in posttraumatic end-stage arthrosis. Int Orthop. 2018;42:2375–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cody EA, Taylor MA, Nunley JA 2nd, Parekh SG, DeOrio JK. Increased early revision rate with the INFINITY total ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718794933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Currier BH, Hecht PJ, Nunley JA 2nd, Mayor MB, Currier JH, Van Citters DW. Analysis of failed ankle arthroplasty components. Foot Ankle Int. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718802589.

  20. Cody EA, Bejarano-Pineda L, Lachman JR, Taylor MA, Gausden EB, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA 2nd. Risk factors for failure of total ankle arthroplasty with a minimum five years of follow-up. Foot Ankle Int. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718806474.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rodríguez-Merchán, E.C., Moracia-Ochagavía, I. (2020). Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Epidemiology and Causes. In: Rodríguez-Merchán, E. (eds) Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24773-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24773-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24772-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24773-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics