Abstract
This chapter examines the notion of ‘value’ in arts and cultural management. Drawing upon methodological and theoretical tools from anthropology, it examines the culturally relative and inherently subjective nature of value, arguing that this is contra prevailing perspectives that view value as set and quantifiable. The chapter introduces the term ‘cracked art world’, which is proffered as an analytical tool for making sense of value’s inherent subjectivity, and the conflicts in art worlds that arise from value divergences among arts and culture stakeholders. It further argues that, without critical examination, cracked art worlds can serve to reify inequalities and thus reinforce dominant values while ignoring or silencing marginal ones. The chapter closes by suggesting ways in which these concepts might be usefully incorporated by arts and cultural managers engaged in intercultural dialogue and exchange.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 3–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aragon, L. V., & Leach, J. (2008). Arts and owners: Intellectual property law and the politics of scale in Indonesian arts. American Ethnologist, 35(4), 607–631.
Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Belfiore, E. (2004). Auditing culture: The subsidised cultural sector in the new public management. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10(2), 183–202.
Bianchini, F., & Parkinson, M. (1993). Cultural policy and urban regeneration: The West European experience. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 1–26). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Coles, A. (2000). Site-specificity: The ethnographic turn. London: Black Dog.
Conquergood, D. (1989). Poetics, play, process, and power: The performative turn in anthropology. Text and Performance Quarterly, 1(1), 82–95.
Crossick, G., & Kaszynska, P. (2014). Under construction: Towards a framework for cultural value. Cultural Trends, 23(2), 120–131.
Crossick, G., & Kaszynska, P. (2016). Understanding the value of arts and culture: The AHRC Cultural Value Project. Swindon: Arts and Humanities Research Council.
Desai, D. (2002). The ethnographic move in contemporary art: What does it mean for art education? Studies in Art Education, 43(4), 307–323.
Dragićević-ŠeŠić, M. (2015). Capacity-building programmes: Keeping institutional memory and regional collective consciousness alive. In P. Dietachmair & M. Ilić (Eds.), Another Europe: 15 years of capacity building with cultural initiatives in the EU neighbourhood (pp. 101–117). Amsterdam: EU Cultural Foundation. Retrieved May 18, 2016, from www.culturalfoundation.eu/library/another_europe
Durrer, V. (2018). The relationship between cultural policy and arts management. In V. Durrer, T. Miller, & D. O’Brien (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of global cultural policy (pp. 64–85). London: Routledge.
Durrer, V., Miller, T., & O’Brien, D. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of global cultural policy. London: Routledge.
Foster, H. (1996). The return of the real. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic.
Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams. New York: Palgrave.
Gray, C. (2007). Commodification and instrumentality in cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(2), 203–215.
Hampel, A. (2017). Fair cooperation: A new paradigm for cultural diplomacy and arts management. Brussels: Peter Lang.
Hansen, W. (2009). When Tengu talk: Hirata Atsutane’s ethnography of the other world. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Henze, R. (2017). Why we have to overcome paternalism in times of populism. In M. Dragićević-Šešić (Ed.), Global culture: Arts festivals and geopolitics (pp. 73–88). Belgrade: Ministry of Culture Republic of Serbia/University of Arts in Belgrade.
Henze, R. (2018). The master’s tool will never dismantle the master’s house: How language and terminology in international arts management perpetuate inequalities. Arts Management Quarterly, 129, 29–34.
Herzfeld, M. (2004). The body impolitic: Artisans and artifice in the global hierarchy of value. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hesmondhalgh, D., Oakley, K., Lee, D., & Nisbett, M. (2015). Cultural policy under new labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hillman Chartrand, H., & McCaughey, C. (1989). The arm’s length principle and the arts: An international perspective—Past, present and future. In M.C. Cummings, Jr., & J.M.D. Schuster (Eds.), Who’s to pay for the arts: The international search for models of support. New York: American Council for the Arts. Retrieved February 23, 2019, from https://www.americansforthearts.org/sites/default/files/ArmsLengthArts_paper.pdf.
Hutter, M., & Frey, B. S. (2010). On the influence of cultural value on economic value. Revue d’économie politique, 120(1), 35–46.
Karttunen, S. (2012). Cultural policy indicators: Reflections on the role of official statisticians in the politics of data collection. Cultural Trends, 21(2), 133–147.
Ladkin, S., McKay, R., & Bojesen, E. (Eds.). (2016). Against value in the arts and education. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lim, L. (Ed.). (2014). Cultural policy in East Asia: Contemporary issues and trends. London: Routledge.
Mackellar, J. (2013). Participant observation at events: Theory, practice and potential. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 4(1), 56–65.
Matarasso, F. (1997). Use or ornament: The social impact of participation in the arts. Stroud: Comedia.
Miller, D. (2008). The uses of value. Geoforum, 39(3), 1122–1132.
Neelands, J., Belfiore, E., Firth, C., Hart, N., Perrin, L., Brock, S., et al. (2015). Enriching Britain: Culture, creativity and growth. Warwick: University of Warwick.
Nisbett, M. (2013). New perspectives on instrumentalism: An empirical study of cultural diplomacy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 19(5), 555–575.
O’Brien, D. (2014). Cultural policy: Management, value and modernity in the creative industries. London: Routledge.
Proctor, L. M. (2015). English and globalization in India: The fractal nature of discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 24(3), 294–314.
Schlesinger, P., Selfe, M., & Munro, E. (2015). Inside a cultural agency: Team ethnography and knowledge exchange. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 45(2), 66–83.
Schneider, A. (2008). Three modes of experimentation with art and ethnography. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14(1), 171–194.
Selwood, S. (2002). The politics of data collection: Gathering, analysing and using data about the subsidised cultural sector in England. Cultural Trends, 12(47), 13–84.
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 23(1), 22–28.
Spooner, M. (2018). Pushing boundaries: Academic de-institutionalization and our radical imagination vs. ourselves and audit culture. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in the public sphere (pp. 25–37). New York: Routledge.
Stadler, R., Reid, S., & Fullagar, S. (2013). An ethnographic exploration of knowledge practices within the Queensland Music Festival. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 4(2), 90–106.
Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge.
Strathern, M. (2016). The authority of value and abjection from value. In S. Ladkin, R. McKay, & E. Bojesen (Eds.), Against value in the arts and education (pp. 37–44). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Şuteu, C. (2006). Another brick in the wall: A critical review of cultural management education in Europe. Amsterdam: Boekmanstudies.
Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
UNESCO. (2013). Culture: A key to sustainable development. Hangzhou: UNESCO. Retrieved May 2, 2015, from www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/final_hangzhou_declaration_english.pdf
UNESCO. (2014). Action plan for the international decade for the rapprochement of cultures (2013–2022). Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved April 13, 2015, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002266/226664e.pdf
Vidmar-Horvat, K. (2012). The predicament of intercultural dialogue: Reconsidering the politics of culture and identity in the EU. Cultural Sociology, 6(1), 27–44.
Wagner, R. (1981). The invention of culture (Revised and Expanded ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Walmsley, B. (2011). Why people go to the theatre: A qualitative study of audience motivation. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 10(4), 335–351.
Willis, P., & Trondman, M. (2000). Manifesto for ethnography. Ethnography, 1(1), 5–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rush, K. (2020). Value as Fiction: An Anthropological Perspective. In: Durrer, V., Henze, R. (eds) Managing Culture. Sociology of the Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24646-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24646-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24645-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24646-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)