Skip to main content

“To Speak Against an Opponent Eloquently Makes You an Unusual Personage”: Joss Whedon as Deleuzian “Minor Writer”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Transmediating the Whedonverse(s)
  • 146 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter positions Joss Whedon via the concept of the “Minor Writer,” as developed by poststructuralist philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. In these terms, “minor” is not simply defined as a literature written from the perspective of an oppressed group, nor a secondary or neglected writing; instead, minor writing takes the language of the dominant culture and warps it to new purposes, thus creating “lines of flight” in terms of creative new trajectories that depart from dominant identities, inventing new forms of collective life, consciousness and affectivity. Such a reading, demonstrated via specific examples drawn from Whedonverse texts, facilitates the interrogation of issues pertaining to politics, fandom, transmedia, feminism and social activism, as well the negotiation of problematic issues concerning Whedon’s status as a cult auteur despite his recent absorption into the Hollywood mainstream.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    David Lavery and Cynthia Burkhead, Joss Whedon: Conversations (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2011), viii.

  2. 2.

    Whedon’s style and following has very much helped establish The Avengers’ cinematic brand and hence has inherently influenced the commercial juggernaut that is the wider Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). For a consideration as to the significance of Whedon’s authorship in the wider sphere of the MCU, see Leora Hadas, “Authorship Assembled: Joss Whedon as Promotional Auteur in Marvel’s The Avengers ,” in The Comics of Joss Whedon (Jefferson: McFarland, 2015), 199–208.

  3. 3.

    Matt Hills, “Mainstream Cult,” The Cult TV Book (London: I.B. Tauris, 2010), 68–68.

  4. 4.

    It is not the purpose of this article to engage in specific debates pertaining to the definition of cult and/or auteur theory. Suffice to say, auteur theory, in its varied forms, offers a framework for the analysis of any complex artistic creation, not just film, and the study of cult television and convergence cultures can help bring some of its more outdated aspects into the twenty-first century. Indeed, the study of cult film and television has opened up many productive avenues for the discussion of fan practices, cinematic taste economies, and historical reception contexts, and has much to tell us about the politics of cultural consumption and its relation to issues of economic and educational capital . See Mark Jancovich, “Cult Fictions: Cult Movies, Subcultural Capital and the Production of Cultural Distinctions,” Cultural Studies 16, no. 2 (November 2010): 306–322.

  5. 5.

    Mary Ellen Iatropoulos, “‘Of Whedonverse Canon and ‘Someone Else’s Sandbox’: Marvel, Much Ado and the Great Auteur Debate,” in After the Avengers: From Joss Whedon’s Hottest, Newest Franchises to the Future of the Whedonverse (Chicago: Popmatters, 2015), 73.

  6. 6.

    Matthew Pateman, “Celebrity Culture, Brand Whedon and the Post-romantic Fallacy,” September 1, 2017, http://www.patemanponders.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/celebrity-culture-brand-whedon-and-post.htm

  7. 7.

    Daniel Lynch, “Between the Network and the Narrative: Transmedia Storytelling as a Philosophical Lens for Creative Writers,” New Writing 13, no. 2 (May 2016): 161.

  8. 8.

    Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Anti-Oedipus (London: Continuum, 1984); Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (London: Continuum, 2004).

  9. 9.

    David Fancy, “Difference, Bodies, Desire: The Collaborative Thought of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari,” Science Fiction Film and Television 3, no. 1 (2010): 93.

  10. 10.

    Michel Foucault, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews (Ithaca: Cornell, 1977), 208.

  11. 11.

    Dorothea Olkowski, Gilles Deleuze and the Ruin of Representation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), 34.

  12. 12.

    John Rajchman, The Deleuze Connections (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000), 115.

  13. 13.

    Jason J. Wallin, A Deleuzian Approach to Curriculum: Essays on a Pedagogical Life (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), 1.

  14. 14.

    Timothy S. Murphy and Daniel W. Smith, “What I Hear Is Thinking Too: Deleuze and Guattari Go Pop,” Echo 3, no. 1 (2001): 1.

  15. 15.

    Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2003), 26–27.

  16. 16.

    Fancy, “Difference, Bodies, Desire,” 100.

  17. 17.

    Claire Colebrook, Gilles Deleuze (Oxford: Routledge, 2002), 5.

  18. 18.

    Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (London: Continuum, 2004), 9.

  19. 19.

    A rhizomatic conception of transmedia storytelling deviates radically from some other conceptions, in which various branches of narrative and knowledge are seen to follow an arboreal path from a canonized, centralized trunk; for example, Jason Mittell’s reading of transmedia television via centrifugal and centripetal structures in “Strategies of Storytelling on Transmedia Television,” and M. J. Clarke’s use of the “tentpole” in Transmedia Television: New Trends in Network Serial Production.

  20. 20.

    Jean Khalfa, Introduction to the Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze (London: Continuum, 1999), 121.

  21. 21.

    Bret Fletcher, “Soul Purpose,” Angel, season 5, episode 10, directed by David Boreanaz, aired January 21, 2004 (The WB).

  22. 22.

    Mark Fortier, “Deleuze and Guattari and the Aims of Adaptation,” Mosaic 29, no. 1 (1996): n.p.

  23. 23.

    Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, 103–104.

  24. 24.

    Deleuze and Guattari, Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature, 17–18.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., 17.

  26. 26.

    Iatropoulos, “Of Whedonverse Canon and Someone Else’s Sandbox,” 72.

  27. 27.

    Francesca Maria Stefanachi, “The Future of Scholarship: Interview with Professor Rhonda V. Wilcox,” in After the Avengers: From Joss Whedon’s Hottest, Newest Franchises to the Future of the Whedonverse (Chicago: Popmatters, 2015), 29. Wilcox further elaborates on the diverse nature of these collaborations: “Jane Espenson, for instance, wrote on all four of his [Whedon’s] major series and has since written on many others and served as a creator of more than one series. David Greenwalt, who collaborated with Whedon on his second series, now has created another strong series that clearly echoes some of the techniques and themes he practiced with Whedon. Actor Danny Strong has gone on from working with Whedon on Buffy to become an Emmy-award-winning writer of television movies. And there are many more” (29–30).

  28. 28.

    Dale K. Koontz, “Foreword,” in Joss Whedon and Religion: Essays on an Angry Atheist’s Explorations of the Sacred (Jefferson: McFarland, 2013), 3.

  29. 29.

    Deleuze and Guattari, Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature, 18.

  30. 30.

    Aaron Barlow, “‘If It Sucks, It’s Your Fault’: Joss Whedon and the Empowerment of Fans,” in Cult Pop Culture: How the Fringe Became Mainstream (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2012), 170.

  31. 31.

    David Kociemba, “Understanding the Espensode,” in Buffy Goes Dark: Essays on the Final Two Seasons of Buffy the Vampire Slayer on Television (Jefferson: McFarland, 2009), 24.

  32. 32.

    Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Anti-Oedipus (London: Continuum, 1984), 371.

  33. 33.

    Deleuze and Guattari, Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature, 18.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., 19.

  35. 35.

    David Lavery, Joss Whedon: A Creative Portrait (New York: I.B. Tauris, 2014), 194; Michael Adams, Slayer Slang: A Buffy the Vampire Slayer Lexicon, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

  36. 36.

    Interestingly, Whedon collaborator Tim Minear describes this very “collective demonstrated via language” as an element of the creative process itself: “after my first year at Mutant Enemy, people started to notice that Joss, David Greenwalt, and yours truly all had a similar way of speaking. We’d all affected the same weird cadence - possibly unnatural to all of us, as no one could quite remember how it started” (Kowalski and Kreider, viii).

  37. 37.

    Lavery, Joss Whedon: A Creative Portrait, 193.

  38. 38.

    Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, 105.

  39. 39.

    Lavery, Joss Whedon: A Creative Portrait, 194.

  40. 40.

    Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, and Robert Brinkley, “What Is a Minor Literature?” Mississippi Review 11, no. 3 (1983): 21.

  41. 41.

    Whedon has contributed to, and collaborated on, many songs and musical compositions in Whedonverse texts: for example, BtVS, Firefly, Much Ado About Nothing (2012), Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog (2008) and its companion piece Commentary! The Musical (2008).

  42. 42.

    Joss Whedon, “Once More, with Feeling,” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 6, episode 7, directed by Joss Whedon, aired November 6, 2001 (UPN).

  43. 43.

    Rhonda Wilcox, Why Buffy Matters: The Art of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (London: I.B. Tauris, 2005), 204.

  44. 44.

    Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, 105.

  45. 45.

    That said, in keeping with his over-arching critique of capitalism, Deleuze also conversely depicts the “popular” as an enormous homogenizing machine depriving “art” of its place and value in contemporary society. It is beyond the remit of this chapter to discuss this; see Deleuze, Negotiations: 1972–1990 (New York: Columbia University Press), 60.

  46. 46.

    Gary Genosko, Félix Guattari: A Critical Introduction (New York: Pluto Press, 2009), 157.

  47. 47.

    Gilles Deleuze, Dialogues (Athlone Press: London, 1977), 45.

  48. 48.

    Colebrook, Gilles Deleuze, 130.

  49. 49.

    Marti Noxon, “The Wish,” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 3, episode 9, directed by David Greenwalt, aired December 8, 1998 (The WB); Joss Whedon, “Doppelgangland,” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 3, episode 16, directed by Joss Whedon, aired February 23, 1999 (The WB).

  50. 50.

    David Kociemba, “‘Where’s the Fun?’ The Comic Apocalypse in ‘The Wish’,” Slayage: The Journal of Whedon Studies 6, no. 3 (2007): 2, http://www.whedonstudies.tv/uploads/2/6/2/8/26288593/kociemba_slayage_6.3.pdf.

  51. 51.

    Barlow, “If It Sucks It’s Your Fault,” 171.

  52. 52.

    Many examples could be presented here in terms of the dialogue and creative processes that take place between creators and fans, primarily facilitated by the Internet; for example, the fan interactions on the official BtVS forums that inspired the creation of the Polgara demon as featured in BtVS’s “The I In team” (4.13.) David Fury, “The I in Team,” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 4, episode 13, directed by James A. Contner, aired February 8, 2000 (The WB). See Nancy Holder, “Writing Tie-ins,” 195.

  53. 53.

    Linda Jencson, “All Those Apocalypses: Disaster Studies and Community in Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel ,” in Reading Joss Whedon (New York: Syracuse University Press, 2014), 112.

  54. 54.

    Stacey Abbott, “Can’t Stop the Signal,” in Investigating Firefly and Serenity : Science Fiction on the Frontier (New York: I.B. Tauris, 2008), 237.

  55. 55.

    Casey J. McCormick, “Active Fandom: Labor and Love in the Whedonverse,” in A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018), 375.

  56. 56.

    Joss Whedon, “Let’s Watch a Girl Get Beaten to Death,” May 20, 2007, http://www.whedonesque.com/comments/13271. For a detailed summary of events surrounding this blog post, contextualized via Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog , see Alyson Buckman, “‘Go Ahead! Run Away! Say It Was Horrible!’: Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog as Resistant Text.”

  57. 57.

    Trish Salah, “Of Activist Fandoms, Auteur Pedagogy, and Imperial Feminism,” in Muslim Women, Transnational Feminism and the Ethics of Pedagogy: Contested Imaginaries in Post-9/11 Cultural Practice (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014), 162.

  58. 58.

    Todd May, Gilles Deleuze: An Introduction (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 150.

  59. 59.

    Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 2: The Time Image (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989), 178.

  60. 60.

    Joss Whedon, “Chosen,” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 7, episode 22, directed by Joss Whedon, aired May 20, 2003 (UPN).

  61. 61.

    Cheryl Vint, “‘Killing Us Softly?’ A Feminist Search for the ‘Real’ Buffy,” Slayage: The Journal of Whedon Studies 5, no. 2 (2002): 21, http://www.whedonstudies.tv/uploads/2/6/2/8/26288593/vint_slayage_2.1.pdf.

  62. 62.

    For a detailed examination of this debate, see Lauren Schultz, “Hot Chicks with Superpowers: The Contested Feminism of Joss Whedon.”

  63. 63.

    Pateman, “Celebrity Culture, Brand Whedon and the Post-romantic Fallacy.”

  64. 64.

    Both Dollhouse (2009–2010) and Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) have been subject to much critical interrogation as to whether their problematic gender representations constitute a betrayal of Whedon’s much touted feminism. Regarding Whedon himself; in August 2017 Whedon’s ex-wife Kai Cole accusing Whedon of being “a hypocrite preaching feminist ideals…a man who does not practice what he preaches” (Cole 2017). This sent shockwaves through various fan communities, just one example being the immediate closure of long-running Whedon fan site Whedonesque. As Jowett and Frouhard-Dourlent summarize: “the fallout from Cole’s article is yet to be determined, though it is worth pointing out that infidelity does not prevent someone from producing feminist work…Whedon scholarship has long debated Whedon’s relationship to feminisms, and scholars within queer studies have been some of the most critical of his supposedly egalitarian and inclusive representations” (Jowett and Frouhard-Dourlent 2017, 3).

  65. 65.

    The interactions between Deleuzian and feminist theory are unsurprisingly very complex. See Rosi Braidotti, “Nomadism with a Difference: Deleuze’s Legacy in a Feminist Perspective.”

  66. 66.

    J. Macgregor Wise and Jennifer Daryl Slack, Culture and Technology (New York: Peter Lang, 2015), 129.

  67. 67.

    Tamsin E. Lorraine, Deleuze and Guattari’s Immanent Ethics: Theory, Subjectivity, and Duration (New York: SUNY Press, 2011), 15.

  68. 68.

    Lauren Schultz, “‘Hot Chicks with Superpowers’: The Contested Feminism of Joss Whedon,” in Reading Joss Whedon (New York: Syracuse University Press, 2014), 357.

  69. 69.

    Lorraine, Deleuze and Guattari’s Immanent Ethics, 5.

  70. 70.

    Lorna Jowett, “Whedon, Weinstein and Why Feminism Matters,” October 30, 2017, https://womensfilmandtelevisionhistory.wordpress.com/2017/10/30/whedon-weinstein-and-why-feminism-matters.

  71. 71.

    Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, 19.

  72. 72.

    Deleuze and Guattari, Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature, 27.

  73. 73.

    Ibid., 41.

  74. 74.

    Joss Whedon, “Let’s Watch a Girl Get Beaten to Death.”

  75. 75.

    Inna Semetsky and Diana Masny, Deleuze and Education (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013), 4.

  76. 76.

    Deleuze, Negotiations, 143.

  77. 77.

    Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, xix.

Bibliography

  • Abbott, Stacey. “‘Can’t Stop the Signal’: The Resurrection/Regeneration of Serenity.” In Investigating Firefly and Serenity: Science Fiction on the Frontier, edited by Rhonda V. Wilcox and Tanya R. Cochran, 227–238. New York: I.B. Tauris, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Michael. Slayer Slang: A Buffy the Vampire Slayer Lexicon. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Avengers. Directed by Joss Whedon. Performed by Robert Downey, Jr., Chris Evans, and Scarlett Johansson. United States: Marvel Studios/Walt Disney Pictures, 2012. Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avengers: Age of Ultron. Directed by Joss Whedon. Performed by Robert Downey, Jr., Chris Evans, and Scarlett Johansson. United States: Marvel Studios/Walt Disney Pictures, 2015. Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, Aaron. “‘If It Sucks It’s Your Fault’: Joss Whedon and the Empowerment of Fans.” In Cult Pop Culture: How the Fringe Became Mainstream, edited by Bob Batchelor, 165–174. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, Rosi. “Nomadism with a Difference: Deleuze’s Legacy in a Feminist Perspective.” Man and World 29 (1996): 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckman, Alyson. “‘Go Ahead! Run Away! Say It Was Horrible!’: Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog as Resistant Text.” Slayage: The Journal of Whedon Studies 8, no. 1 (2010): 17p. http://www.whedonstudies.tv/uploads/2/6/2/8/26288593/buckman_slayage_8.1.pdf.

  • Clarke, M. J. Transmedia Television: New Trends in Network Serial Production. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Kai. “Joss Whedon Is a ‘Hypocrite Preaching Feminist Ideals,’ Ex-Wife Kai Cole Says (guest blog).” The Wrap, August 20, 2017. Accessed March 20, 2018. https://www.thewrap.com/joss-whedon-feminist-hypocrite-infidelity-affairs-ex-wife-kai-cole-says/.

  • Colebrook, Claire. Gilles Deleuze. Oxford: Routledge, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 1: The Movement Image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Cinema 2: The Time Image. London: Continuum, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Dialogues. London: Athlone Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Negotiations: 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus. London: Continuum, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, Félix Guattari, and Robert Brinkley. “What Is a Minor Literature?” Mississippi Review 11, no. 3 (1983): 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog. Directed by Joss Whedon. Written by Joss Whedon, Jed Whedon, Zack Whedon, Maurissa Tancharoen. Performed by Neil Patrick Harris and Nathan Fillion. United States: Mutant Enemy Productions, 2008. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fancy, David. “Difference, Bodies, Desire: The Collaborative Thought of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari.” Science Fiction Film and Television 3, no. 1 (2010): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2010.6.

  • Fletcher, Bret, writer. “Soul Purpose.” Angel, season 5, episode 10. Directed by David Boreanaz. Aired January 21, 2004, on The WB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortier, Mark. “Shakespeare as ‘Minor Theater’: Deleuze and Guattari and the Aims of Adaptation.” Mosaic 29, no. 1 (1996): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Edited by Donald F. Bouchard. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fury, David, writer. “The I in Team.” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 4, episode 13. Directed by James A. Contner. Aired February 8, 2000, on The WB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genosko, Gary. Félix Guattari: A Critical Introduction. New York: Pluto Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadas, Leora. “Authorship Assembled: Joss Whedon as Promotional Auteur in Marvel’s The Avengers.” In The Comics of Joss Whedon: Critical Essays, edited by Valerie Estelle Frankel, 199–208. Jefferson: McFarland, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, Matt. “Mainstream Cult.” In The Cult TV Book, edited by Stacey Abbott, 67–73. London: I.B. Tauris, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder, Nancy. “Writing Tie-ins.” In The Cult TV Book, edited by Stacey Abbott, 191–198. London, I.B. Tauris, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatropoulos, Mary Ellen. “‘Of Whedonverse Canon and ‘Someone Else’s Sandbox’: Marvel, Much Ado and the Great Auteur Debate.” In After the Avengers: From Joss Whedon’s Hottest, Newest Franchises to the Future of the Whedonverse, edited by Valerie Estelle Frankel, n.p. Chicago: Popmatters, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jancovich, Mark. “Cult Fictions: Cult Movies, Subcultural Capital and the Production of Cultural Distinctions.” Cultural Studies 16, no. 2 (2002): 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380110107607.

  • Jencson, Linda J. “All Those Apocalypses: Disaster Studies and Community in Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel.” In Reading Joss Whedon, edited by Rhonda V. Wilcox, Tanya R. Cochran, Cynthea Masson, and David Lavery, 99–112. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowett, Lorna. “Whedon, Weinstein and Why Feminism Matters.” Women’s Film and Television History Network, October 30, 2017. Accessed May 5, 2018. https://womensfilmandtelevisionhistory.wordpress.com/2017/10/30/whedon-weinstein-and-why-feminism-matters/.

  • Jowett, Lorna, and Hélène Frouhard-Dourlent. “Introduction to Queering the Whedonverses: Interrogating Whedon from a Multiplicity of Queer Perspectives.” Slayage: The Journal of Whedon Studies 15, no. 2 (Summer/Fall 2017): 7p. http://www.whedonstudies.tv/uploads/2/6/2/8/26288593/0.jowett.frohard-dourlent_-_slayage_15.2.pdf.

  • Khalfa, Jean. Introduction to the Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. London: Continuum, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kociemba, David. “Understanding the Espensode.” In Buffy Goes Dark: Essays on the Final Two Seasons of Buffy the Vampire Slayer on Television, edited by Elizabeth L. Rambo, James B. South, and Lynne Y. Edwards, 23–40. Jefferson: McFarland, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “‘Where’s the fun?’: The Comic Apocalypse in ‘The Wish’.” Slayage: The Journal of Whedon Studies 6, no. 3 (Spring 2007): 9p. http://www.whedonstudies.tv/uploads/2/6/2/8/26288593/kociemba_slayage_6.3.pdf.

  • Koontz, K. Dale. “Foreword.” In Joss Whedon and Religion: Essays on an Angry Atheist’s Explorations of the Sacred, edited by Anthony R. Mills, John W. Morehead, and J. Ryan Parker, 1–4. Jefferson: McFarland, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, Dean A., and Evan S. Kreider. The Philosophy of Joss Whedon. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavery, David. Joss Whedon: A Creative Portrait. New York: I.B. Tauris, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavery, David, and Cynthia Burkhead. Joss Whedon: Conversations. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorraine, Tamsin. Deleuze and Guattari’s Immanent Ethics: Theory, Subjectivity, and Duration. New York: SUNY Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Daniel. “Between the Network and the Narrative: Transmedia Storytelling as a Philosophical Lens for Creative Writers.” New Writing 13, no. 2 (2016): 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2016.1170858.

  • May, Todd. Gilles Deleuze: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, Casey J. “Active Fandom: Labor and Love in the Whedonverse.” In A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies, edited by Paul Booth, 369–384. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclain, Katia. “Angel vs the Grand Inquisitor.” In The Literary Angel: Essays on Influences and Traditions Reflected in the Joss Whedon Series, edited by Amijo Comeford and Tamy Burnett, 130–146. Jefferson: McFarland, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittell, Jason. “Strategies of Storytelling on Transmedia Television.” In Storyworlds Across Media: Toward a Media-Conscious Narratology, edited by Marie-Laure Ryan and Jan-Noël Thon, 253–277. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Much Ado About Nothing. Directed by Joss Whedon. Performed by Amy Acker and Alexis Denisof. United States: Bellwether Pictures/Lionsgate, 2012. Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Timothy S., and Daniel W. Smith. “What I Hear Is Thinking Too: Deleuze and Guattari Go Pop.” ECHO: A Music-Centered Journal 3, no. 1 (2001): 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noxon, Marti, writer. “The Wish.” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 3, episode 9. Directed by David Greenwalt. Aired December 8, 1998, on The WB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olkowski, Dorothea. Gilles Deleuze and the Ruin of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Matthew. “Celebrity Culture, Brand Whedon and the Post-romantic Fallacy.” Pateman’s Ponderings (blog), September 1, 2017. Accessed May 21, 2018. http://www.patemanponders.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/celebrity-culture-brand-whedon-and-post.htm.

  • Rajchman, John. The Deleuze Connections. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salah, Trish. “Of Activist Fandoms, Auteur Pedagogy, and Imperial feminism.” In Muslim Women, Transnational Feminism and the Ethics of Pedagogy: Contested Imaginaries in Post-9/11 Cultural Practice, edited by Lisa K. Taylor and Jasmin Zine, 152–174. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Lauren. “‘Hot Chicks with Superpowers’: The Contested Feminism of Joss Whedon.” In Reading Joss Whedon, edited by Rhonda V. Wilcox, Tanya R. Cochran, Cynthea Masson, and David Lavery, 356–370. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, Inna, and Diana Masny. Deleuze and Education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serenity. Directed by Joss Whedon. Performed by Nathan Fillion and Gina Torres. United States: Universal Pictures, 2005. Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanachi, Francesca Maria. “The Future of Scholarship: Interview with Professor Rhonda V. Wilcox.” In After the Avengers: From Joss Whedon’s Hottest, Newest Franchises to the Future of the Whedonverse, edited by Valerie Estelle Frankel, n.p. Chicago: Popmatters, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vint, Cheryl. “‘Killing Us Softly?’ A Feminist Search for the ‘Real’ Buffy.” Slayage: The Journal of Whedon Studies 2, no. 1 (2002): 6p. http://www.whedonstudies.tv/uploads/2/6/2/8/26288593/vint_slayage_2.1.pdf.

  • Wallin, Jason J. A Deleuzian Approach to Curriculum: Essays on a Pedagogical Life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whedon, Joss, writer. “Chosen.” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 7, episode 22. Aired May 20, 2003, on UPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Doppelgangland.” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 3, episode 16. Aired February 23, 1999, on The WB.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Let’s Watch a Girl Get Beaten to Death.” Whedonesque, May 20, 2007. Accessed April 12, 2018. http://www.whedonesque.com/comments/13271.

  • ———. “Once More, with Feeling.” Buffy the Vampire Slayer, season 6, episode 7. Aired November 6, 2001, on UPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whedon, Joss, and Jed Whedon, directors. Commentary! The Musical. Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog. Written by Joss Whedon, Jed Whedon, Zack Whedon, Maurissa Tancharoen. United States: Mutant Enemy Productions, 2008. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Rhonda V. Why Buffy Matters: The Art of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. London: I.B. Tauris, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, J. Macgregor, and Jennifer Daryl Slack. Culture and Technology. New York: Peter Lang, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Starr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Starr, M. (2019). “To Speak Against an Opponent Eloquently Makes You an Unusual Personage”: Joss Whedon as Deleuzian “Minor Writer”. In: Kitchens, J., Hawk, J. (eds) Transmediating the Whedonverse(s). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24616-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics