Skip to main content

Complications in General Glenohumeral and Subacromial Space Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complications in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

Typical and frequent indications for arthroscopic shoulder surgery include the “true” outlet impingement, a symptomatic osteoarthritis of the ac-joint and a chronic calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff. Such indications are routinely treated by standard arthroscopic techniques: Acromioplasty, ac-joint resection and arthroscopic removal of calcific deposits. Nevertheless, each disease has typical complications and pitfalls in the course of decision making for surgery (preoperative), during arthroscopic execution (peroperative) and during the postoperative treatment period (postoperative). Anticipating such disease- und procedure-specific complications in advance, most of the can be effectively avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beeler S, Hasler A, Götschi T, Meyer DC, Gerber C. The critical shoulder angle: acromial coverage is more relevant than glenoid inclination. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc. 2018;37:205–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moor BK, Wieser K, Slankamenac K, Gerber C, Bouaicha S. Relationship of individual scapular anatomy and degenerative rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(4):536–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams GD, Gupta AK, Hussey KE, Tetteh ES, Karas V, Bach BR, et al. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with and without acromioplasty: randomized prospective trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(6):1296–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514529091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ketola S, Lehtinen JT, Arnala I. Arthroscopic decompression not recommended in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy: a final review of a randomised controlled trial at a minimum follow-up of ten years. Bone Jt J. 2017;99-B(6):799–805. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0569.R1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolk A, Thomassen BJW, Hund H, de Witte PB, Henkus H-E, Wassenaar WG, et al. Does acromioplasty result in favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes in the management of chronic subacromial pain syndrome? A double-blinded randomized clinical trial with 9 to 14 years’ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(8):1407–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Song L, Miao L, Zhang P, Wang W-L. Does concomitant acromioplasty facilitate arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears? A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):685. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2311-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Farfaras S, Sernert N, Rostgard Christensen L, Hallström EK, Kartus J-T. Subacromial decompression yields a better clinical outcome than therapy alone: a prospective randomized study of patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(6):1397–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518755759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaeger M, Berndt T, Rühmann O, Lerch S. Patients with impingement syndrome with and without rotator cuff tears do well 20 years after arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(3):409–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ranebo MC, Björnsson Hallgren HC, Norlin R, Adolfsson LE. Clinical and structural outcome 22 years after acromioplasty without tendon repair in patients with subacromial pain and cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(7):1262–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choo HJ, Lee SJ, Kim JH, Cha SS, Park YM, Park JS, et al. Can symptomatic acromioclavicular joints be differentiated from asymptomatic acromioclavicular joints on 3-T MR imaging? Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(4):e184–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.10.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Veen EJD, Donders CM, Westerbeek RE, Derks RPH, Landman EBM, Koorevaar CT. Predictive findings on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with symptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(8):e252–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barwood SA, French JA, Watson LA, Balster SM, Hoy GA, Pizzari T. The Specific AC Score (SACS): a new and validated method of assessment of isolated acromioclavicular joint pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27:2214–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kay SP, Dragoo JL, Lee R. Long-term results of arthroscopic resection of the distal clavicle with concomitant subacromial decompression. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(8):805–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robertson WJ, Griffith MH, Carroll K, O’Donnell T, Gill TJ. Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle excision: a comparative assessment at intermediate-term follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(11):2415–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511419633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oh JH, Kim JY, Choi JH, Park S-M. Is arthroscopic distal clavicle resection necessary for patients with radiological acromioclavicular joint arthritis and rotator cuff tears? A prospective randomized comparative study. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(11):2567–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514547254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park YB, Koh KH, Shon MS, Park YE, Yoo JC. Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection in symptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis combined with rotator cuff tear: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):985–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514563911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim J, Chung J, Ok H. Asymptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis in arthroscopic rotator cuff tendon repair: a prospective randomized comparison study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(3):363–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1216-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stine IA, Vangsness CT. Analysis of the capsule and ligament insertions about the acromioclavicular joint: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(9):968–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2009.04.072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Edwards SL, Wilson NA, Flores SE, Koh JL, Zhang L-Q. Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection: a biomechanical analysis of resection length and joint compliance in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(12):1278–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Apivatgaroon A, Sanguanjit P. Arthroscopic distal clavicle and medial border of acromion resection for symptomatic acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(1):e25–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2016.08.033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaillard J, Calò M, Nourissat G. Bipolar acromioclavicular joint resection. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(6):e2229–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pandhi NG, Esquivel AO, Hanna JD, Lemos DW, Staron JS, Lemos SE. The biomechanical stability of distal clavicle excision versus symmetric acromioclavicular joint resection. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(2):291–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512469873.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baxter JA, Phadnis J, Robinson PM, Funk L. Functional outcome of open acromioclavicular joint stabilization for instability following distal clavicle resection. J Orthop. 2018;15(3):761–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2018.05.013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Strauss EJ, Barker JU, McGill K, Verma NN. The evaluation and management of failed distal clavicle excision. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010;18(3):213–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181e892da.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Begly J, Tyagi V, Strauss E. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) as a cause of failure following distal clavicle excision a case report and review of the literature. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2017;75(4):279–81.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tytherleigh-Strong G, Gill J, Sforza G, Copeland S, Levy O. Reossification and fusion across the acromioclavicular joint after arthroscopic acromioplasty and distal clavicle resection. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(9):E36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zumstein MA, Schiessl P, Ambuehl B, Bolliger L, Weihs J, Maurer MH, et al. New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(1):125–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4579-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tragord BS, Bui-Mansfield LT, Croy T, Shaffer SW. Suprascapular neuropathy after distal clavicle resection and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a resident’s case problem. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(4):299–305. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2015.5416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghodadra N, Lee GH, Kung P, Busfield BT, Kharazzi FD. Distal clavicle fracture as a complication of arthroscopic distal clavicle resection. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(8):929–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Witte PB, van Adrichem RA, Selten JW, Nagels J, Reijnierse M, Nelissen RGHH. Radiological and clinical predictors of long-term outcome in rotator cuff calcific tendinitis. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(10):3401–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4224-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chou W-Y, Wang C-J, Wu K-T, Yang Y-J, Ko J-Y, Siu K-K. Prognostic factors for the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(12):1643–50. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2016-1178.R1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Clement ND, Watts AC, Phillips C, McBirnie JM. Short-term outcome after arthroscopic bursectomy debridement of rotator cuff calcific tendonopathy with and without subacromial decompression: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(9):1680–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Porcellini G, Paladini P, Campi F, Paganelli M. Arthroscopic treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up findings at two to five years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(5):503–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058274604000904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jacobs R, Debeer P. Calcifying tendinitis of the rotator cuff: functional outcome after arthroscopic treatment. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;72(3):276–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hsu HC, Wu JJ, Jim YF, Chang CY, Lo WH, Yang DJ. Calcific tendinitis and rotator cuff tearing: a clinical and radiographic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3(3):159–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80095-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Balke M, Bielefeld R, Schmidt C, Dedy N, Liem D. Calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: midterm results after arthroscopic treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(3):657–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511430202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Merolla G, Bhat MG, Paladini P, Porcellini G. Complications of calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: a concise review. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015;16(3):175–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0339-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Porcellini G, Paladini P, Campi F, Pegreffi F. Osteolytic lesion of greater tuberosity in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(2):210–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathias Wellmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wellmann, M. (2020). Complications in General Glenohumeral and Subacromial Space Procedures. In: Lafosse, L., Agneskirchner, J., Lafosse, T. (eds) Complications in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24574-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24574-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24573-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24574-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics