Abstract
The use of additive manufacturing (AM) for the fabrication of biomedical implants has grown in the recent years because it gives the flexibility to create patient-specific customised implants and on-demand production. AM has opened the possibility of the fabrication of implants in the clinical setting, so-called bedside manufacturing that gives the opportunity to print directly into the patient or in a nearby location.
In this chapter, an insight into the global 3D-printed medical devices market and more detailed discussion of the different applications including artificial skin; cardiovascular stents; ear, nose and throat (ENT); and dental are presented. The chapter reviews recent advancements in 3D printing technologies for biomedical implants. It describes recent developments in the 3D printing of artificial skin with a focus on the treatment of burn wounds. Additionally, the recent progress in the field of electronic, multifunctional skin is reviewed.
The chapter also discusses the methods and materials being used for 3D printing stents including computational-based 3D-printed metal, biodegradable polymer, self-expandable and drug-eluting stents.
ENT is a speciality area where AM has been also successfully utilised for the fabrication of implants. The examples of implants such as hearing aids which are already on the market and 3D printing techniques which can be used to create implants to replace the bones in the middle ear (ossicles) when damaged or to reconstruct the entire ear are discussed.
Finally, dental implants in the research and development stage is reviewed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
3D Systems. (2018). Dental materials. Rock Hill, SC: 3D Systems.
Almany, L., & Seliktar, D. (2005). Biosynthetic hydrogel scaffolds made from fibrinogen and polyethylene glycol for 3D cell cultures. Biomaterials, 26(15), 2467–2477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.047.
Altunay, Z. O., et al. (2016). Three-dimensional printing of large nasal septal perforations for optimal prosthetic closure. American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, 30(4), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4324.
Ang, H. Y., et al. (2017). Mechanical behavior of polymer-based vs. metallic-based bioresorbable stents. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 9(Suppl 9), S923–S934. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.06.30.
Baluch, N., et al. (2014). Auricular reconstruction for microtia: A review of available methods. Plastic Surgery, 22(1), 39–43.
Banks, J. (2013). Adding value in additive manufacturing: Researchers in the United Kingdom and Europe look to 3D printing for customization. IEEE Pulse, 4(6), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2013.2279617.
Binder, K. W., et al. (2010). In situ bioprinting of the skin for burns. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 211(3), S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.06.198.
Boyd, R. L., & Miller, R. J. (2000). The Invisalign system in adult orthodontics: Mild crowding and space closure cases. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, XXXIV(4), 203–212.
Bussiness Wire. (2018). Global dental 3D printing market 2018–2024—Drivers, opportunities, and trends. San Francisco, CA: Bussiness Wire.
Cabrera, M. S., et al. (2017). Computationally designed 3D printed self-expandable polymer stents with biodegradation capacity for minimally invasive heart valve implantation. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 4(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2016.0052.
Cannady, S. B., Cook, T. A., & Wax, M. K. (2009). The total nasal defect and reconstruction. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, 17(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2009.01.002.
Carden, K. A., et al. (2005). Tracheomalacia and tracheobronchomalacia in children and adults. Chest, 127(3), 984–1005. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.3.984.
Catalano, E., et al. (2013). Tissue-engineered skin substitutes: An overview. Journal of Artificial Organs, 16(4), 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-013-0734-0.
Chaudhari, A. A., et al. (2016). Future prospects for scaffolding methods and biomaterials in skin tissue engineering: A review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121974.
Cubo, N., et al. (2016). 3D bioprinting of functional human skin: Production and in vivo analysis. Biofabrication, 9(1), 015006.
Daamen, W., et al. (2003). Preparation and evaluation of molecularly-defined collagen–elastin–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 24(22), 4001–4009. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00273-4.
Dawood, A., et al. (2015). 3D printing in dentistry. British Dental Journal, 219(11), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914.
Debels, H., et al. (2015). Dermal matrices and bioengineered skin substitutes. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 3(1), e284. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000219.
Ehrenreich, M., & Ruszczak, Z. (2006). Update on tissue-engineered biological dressings. Tissue Engineering, 12(9), 2407–2424. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.2407.
EnvisionTEC. (2017). Dental 3D printing materials | Clinically-approved | Industry-leading. Dearborn, MI: EnvisionTEC.
EnvisionTEC. (n.d.). Hearing aid | 3D printing materials. Dearborn, MI: EnvisionTEC.
FDA. (2017). Technical considerations for additive manufactured medical devices—Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Silver Springer, MD: FDA.
Flege, C., et al. (2013). Development and characterization of a coronary polylactic acid stent prototype generated by selective laser melting. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 24(1), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4779-z.
Flores, R. L., et al. (2017). The technique for 3D printing patient-specific models for auricular reconstruction. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 45(6), 937–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.03.022.
Foerster, A., et al. (2016). Stainless steel surface functionalization for immobilization of antibody fragments for cardiovascular applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 104(4), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35616.
Gardien, K. L., Middelkoop, E., & Ulrich, M. M. (2014). Progress towards cell-based burn wound treatments. Regenerative Medicine, 9(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme.13.97.
Hammock, M. L., et al. (2013). 25th anniversary article: The evolution of electronic skin (E-Skin): A brief history, design considerations, and recent progress. Advanced Materials, 25(42), 5997–6038. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302240.
Hazeveld, A., Huddleston Slater, J. J. R., & Ren, Y. (2014). Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 145(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.011.
Hirsch, J. D., Vincent, R. L., & Eisenman, D. J. (2017). Surgical reconstruction of the ossicular chain with custom 3D printed ossicular prosthesis. 3D Printing in Medicine, 3(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-017-0015-2.
House, J. W., & Teufert, K. B. (2001). Extrusion rates and hearing results in ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 125(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2001.117163.
Invisalign. (2017). Teeth straightening with clear, nearly invisible braces. UK: Invisalign.
Javaid, M., & Haleem, A. (2017). Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: A literature based review. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2017.09.003.
Jensen, W. (2018). Medical: University of Michigan—Customizing a biocompatible material for additively manufactured medical implants. EOS.
Jeon, B., et al. (2016). Fabrication of three-dimensional scan-to-print ear model for microtia reconstruction. Journal of Surgical Research, 206(2), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.004.
Kang, H.-W., et al. (2016). A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nature Biotechnology, 34(3), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413.
Kesti, M., et al. (2015). Bioprinting complex cartilaginous structures with clinically compliant biomaterials. Advanced Functional Materials, 25, 7406–7417. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201503423.
Klare, M., et al. (2004). Low-viscous, radiation curable formulation, particularly for the stereo-lithographical production of earpiece (patent DE10328302A1).
Kleinedler, J. J., et al. (2012). Novel nanocomposite stent coating releasing resveratrol and quercetin reduces neointimal hyperplasia and promotes re-endothelialization. Journal of Controlled Release, 159(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.008.
Koch, L., et al. (2012). Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 109(7), 1855–1863. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24455.
Kozin, E. D., et al. (2016). Design, fabrication, and in vitro testing of novel three-dimensionally printed tympanic membrane grafts. Hearing Research, 340, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.005.
Lee, C. H., Singla, A., & Lee, Y. (2001). Biomedical applications of collagen. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 221(1–2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00691-3.
Lee, W., et al. (2009). Multi-layered culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through three-dimensional freeform fabrication. Biomaterials, 30(8), 1587–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.009.
Lee, J. S., et al. (2014a). 3D printing of composite tissue with complex shape applied to ear regeneration. Biofabrication, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024103.
Lee, V., et al. (2014b). Design and fabrication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, 20(6), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0335.
Li, C., & Chen, Y. (2012). Multilayer dental appliances and related methods and systems (patent US9655691B2).
Ma, L., et al. (2003). Collagen/chitosan porous scaffolds with improved biostability for skin tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 24(26), 4833–4841. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00374-0.
Mannoor, M. S., et al. (2013). 3D printed bionic ears. Nano Letters, 13(6), 2634–2639. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl4007744.
Martinez, A. W., & Chaikof, E. L. (2011). Microfabrication and nanotechnology in stent design. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 3(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.123.
Masters, M., Velde, T., & McBagonluri, F. (2006). Rapid manufacturing in the hearing industry. In Rapid manufacturing (pp. 195–209). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470033991.ch12.
McCue, T. (2017). 3D printing moves align technology toward $1.3 billion in sales. Forbes.
MedMarketDiligence, LLC. (2018). Worldwide wound management, forecast to 2026: Established and emerging products, technologies and markets in the Americas, Europe, Asia/Pacific and rest of world.
Metcalfe, A. D., & Ferguson, M. W. J. (2007). Tissue engineering of replacement skin: The crossroads of biomaterials, wound healing, embryonic development, stem cells and regeneration. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(14), 413–437. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0179.
Michael, S., et al. (2013). Tissue engineered skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice. PLoS One, 8(3), e5774. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057741.
Mills, D., et al. (2017). The use of 3D printing in the fabrication of nasal stents. Inventions, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions3010001.
Mishiro, Y., et al. (2010). Prognostic factors of long-term outcomes after ossiculoplasty using multivariate analysis. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 267(6), 861–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1133-2.
Morrison, R. J., et al. (2015). Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients. Science Translational Medicine, 7(285), 285ra64. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3010825.
Morrison, R. J., et al. (2017). Treatment of severe acquired tracheomalacia with a patient-specific, 3D-printed, permanent tracheal splint. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 143(5), 523. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2016.3932.
Mossey, P. A., et al. (2009). Cleft lip and palate. Lancet (London, England), 374(9703), 1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4.
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology, 32(8), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958.
Nathoo, R., Howe, N., & Cohen, G. (2014). Skin substitutes: An overview of the key players in wound management. The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 7(10), 44–48.
Norouzi, M., et al. (2015). Advances in skin regeneration: Application of electrospun scaffolds. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 4(8), 1114–1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500001.
Nyame, T. T., et al. (2015). Tissue-engineered skin substitutes. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 136(6), 1379–1388. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001748.
OPM. (2016). OsteoFab® Technology. South Windsor, CT: OPM.
Park, S. A., et al. (2015). In vivo evaluation and characterization of a bio-absorbable drug-coated stent fabricated using a 3D-printing system. Materials Letters, 141, 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.11.119.
Park, S. H., et al. (2017). New application of three-dimensional printing biomaterial in nasal reconstruction. The Laryngoscope, 127(5), 1036–1043. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26400.
Peck, M. D. (2011). Epidemiology of burns throughout the world. Part I: Distribution and risk factors. Burns, 37(7), 1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.06.005.
Placko, M. (2016). New 3D printed nose implant is fully functional.
Preston, K. A. (2017). Treatment and post-treatment posterior occlusal changes in Invisalign® and traditional braces: A randomized controlled. Retrieved from https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/161323.
Profshare. (2018). 3D printing medical devices market report by product type (external wearable devices, clinical study devices) by application/end user (hospital, medical center) by industry analysis, volume, share, growth, challenges, trends and forecast 2017–2025. Retrieved from https://www.profsharemarketresearch.com/3d-printing-medical-devices-market-report/.
Ramadugu, P., & Latha Alikatte, K. (2016). A review on biodegradable and bioabsorbable stents for coronary artery disease. Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability, 08(02), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.4172/jbb.1000269.
Rasperini, G., et al. (2015). 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffold for periodontal repair. Journal of Dental Research, 94(9_Suppl), 153S–157S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515588303.
Ruiz-Cantu, L., et al. (2016). 3D bioprinting of mechanically strong chondrocyte-laden constructs for major nose reconstruction. In 16th Annual Meeting of the Tissue and Cell Engineering Society (p. 39).
Saito, S. (2005). New horizon of bioabsorbable stent. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 66(4), 595–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20590.
Sander, I., et al. (2017). Patient education for endoscopic sinus surgery: Preliminary experience using 3D-printed clinical imaging data. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 8(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb8020013.
Sandström, C. (2015). Adopting 3D printing for manufacturing—The case of the hearing aid industry. Ratio Working Papers, (262), 1–20.
Savage, M. P., et al. (1994). Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome after implantation of a balloon-expandable stent in the native coronary circulation. Palmaz-Schatz Stent Study Group. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 24(5), 1207–1212.
Scheinert, D., et al. (2005). Prevalence and clinical impact of stent fractures after femoropopliteal stenting. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 45(2), 312–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.026.
Schubert, C., Van Langeveld, M. C., & Donoso, L. A. (2014). Innovations in 3D printing: A 3D overview from optics to organs. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 98(2), 159–161. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304446.
Sharma, R. (2013). The 3D printing revolution you have not heard about. Forbes.
Shevchenko, R. V., James, S. L., & James, S. E. (2010). A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7(43), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0403.
Shieh, H. F., & Jennings, R. W. (2017). Three-dimensional printing of external airway splints for tracheomalacia. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 9(3), 414–416. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.02.53.
Shim, J.-H., et al. (2012). Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering using a multi-head tissue/organ building system. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 22(8), 085014. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/22/8/085014.
Siblani, A. (2018). The 3D printing race is on for 2018. tctmagazine, 4–7.
Singh, D., Singh, D., & Han, S. S. (2016). 3D printing of scaffold for cells delivery: Advances in skin tissue engineering. Polymers, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8010019.
Skardal, A., et al. (2012). Bioprinted amniotic fluid-derived stem cells accelerate healing of large skin wounds. Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 1(11), 792–802. https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2012-0088.
Sonova. (n.d.). 3D printing technology for improved hearing. Stäfa, Switzerland: Sonova.
Strens, D., et al. (2012). A pilot cost-of-illness study on long-term complications/sequelae of AOM. B-ENT, 8(3), 153–165.
Supp, D. M., & Boyce, S. T. (2005). Engineered skin substitutes: Practices and potentials. Clinics in Dermatology, 23(4), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.07.023.
Tahayeri, A., et al. (2018). 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dental Materials, 34(2), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DENTAL.2017.10.003.
Tarassoli, S. P., et al. (2018). Skin tissue engineering using 3D bioprinting: An evolving research field. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 71(5), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.12.006.
van Lith, R., et al. (2016). 3D-printing strong high-resolution antioxidant bioresorbable vascular stents. Advanced Materials Technologies, 1(9), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201600138.
Vats, A., et al. (2003). Scaffolds and biomaterials for tissue engineering: A review of clinical applications. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences, 28(3), 165–172.
Ventola, C. L. (2014). Medical applications for 3D printing: Current and projected uses. P & T, 39(10), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.005.
Vijayavenkataraman, S., Lu, W. F., & Fuh, J. Y. H. (2016). 3D bioprinting of skin: A state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and processes. Biofabrication, 8(3), 032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032001.
Witek, L., et al. (2016). Patient-specific 3D models for autogenous ear reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, 4(10), e1093. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001093.
Yung, M. (2006). Long-term results of ossiculoplasty: Reasons for surgical failure. Otology & Neurotology, 27(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mao.0000176173.94764.f5.
Zhong, S. P., Zhang, Y. Z., & Lim, C. T. (2010). Tissue scaffolds for skin wound healing and dermal reconstruction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 2(5), 510–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.100.
Zhou, G., et al. (2018). In vitro regeneration of patient-specific ear-shaped cartilage and its first clinical application for auricular reconstruction. EBioMedicine, 28, 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.011.
Zhu, Z., et al. (2018). 3D printed functional and biological materials on moving freeform surfaces. Advanced Materials, 30(23), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201707495.
Zopf, D. A., et al. (2013). Bioresorbable airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(21), 2043–2045. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1301237.
Zopf, D. A., et al. (2014). Treatment of severe porcine tracheomalacia with a 3-dimensionally printed, bioresorbable, external airway splint. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 140(61), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5644.Treatment.
Zou, Z., et al. (2018). Rehealable, fully recyclable, and malleable electronic skin enabled by dynamic covalent thermoset nanocomposite. Science Advances, 4(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq0508.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Foerster, A., Cantu, L.R., Wildman, R., Tuck, C. (2019). Current Market for Biomedical Implants. In: Devine, D. (eds) Polymer-Based Additive Manufacturing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24532-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24532-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24531-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24532-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)