Skip to main content

Lvov-Warsaw School: Historical and Sociological Comments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinary Investigations into the Lvov-Warsaw School

Part of the book series: History of Analytic Philosophy ((History of Analytic Philosophy))

Abstract

Kazimierz Twardowski, a student of Brentano, established an analytical philosophical school in Lvov at the end of the nineteenth century. As charismatic teacher, he trained a group of young philosophers very soon. This group became the Lvov-Warsaw School (LWS) just after the end of World War I; in fact, its particular members obtained positions in other Polish universities (in Cracow, Vilna and Poznań). Although some philosophers from LWS were active until the end of the twentieth century (even at the beginning of twenty-first century), the School itself existed as an organised and compact scientific enterprise until 1939. Its end was caused by World War II and the later political changes. LWS was a large and complex community (about 80 persons) with several generations and circles. Twardowski and his oldest students (like Jan Łukasiewicz, Stanisław Leśniewski, Władysław Witwicki, Tadeusz Kotarbiński, Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz, Zygmunt Zawirski and Tadeusz Czeżowski) constituted the first generation of LWS. They trained the second generation, mostly acting in Lvov and Warsaw. The Warsaw Logical School with Leśniewski, Łukasiewicz and Alfred Tarski as the main representatives, became the most famous branch of LWS, working on various problems of mathematical logic. This circle had close connections with Polish Mathematical School. Philosophers like Ajdukiewicz, Czeżowski, Kotarbiński or Zawirski contributed to epistemology, ontology, philosophy of language and philosophy of science. On the other hand, LWS was also active in the history of philosophy, ethics, aesthetics and psychology. Thus, all basic parts of philosophy were represented in LWS. Due to the multi-ethnic character of Polish society in the interwar period, LWS consisted not only of Poles (the majority), but also Jews and Ukrainians. The significance of LWS can be considered from the following two axes. Logicians achieved many fundamental results which influenced the world logical research. Some of them (Tarski’s theory of truth, Łukasiewicz’s many-valued logic, Leśniewski’s systems) were important for general philosophy. Taking into account the role of LWS in Poland, this school essentially contributed to philosophical culture of this country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Alan R. Perreiah (1991) once faulted me for not including Chwistek in the LWS. He failed to notice, however, that being a logistician in Lvov was not enough to belong to the School. Having remarked on Chwistek’s critical approach to the LWS, let me also note that other critics (and there were more of them; see Woleński 1997) included Henryk Elzenberg (see Zegzuła-Nowak 2017), Ludwik Fleck and Florian Znaniecki.

  2. 2.

    I cannot help but recount the following story here. I had read the history of analytic philosophy written by an American author (I will leave out the name and the title). I only found one Polish name in it—Alfred Tarski. I asked the author why he had left out Polish philosophers. He answered that he knew there were logisticians in Poland, but had never heard of any philosophers.

  3. 3.

    Some also actively participated in the resistance movement, e.g. Hiż worked as a cryptologist at the Home Army (AK) Headquarters, and Sobociński was part of the political leadership of the National Armed Forces (NSZ).

  4. 4.

    This is a paraphrase of a famous quote from Mikołaj Rej: ‘Among other nations let it always be known / That the Poles are not geese, have a tongue of their own.’

References

  • Dąmbska, I. (1948). Pięćdziesiąt lat filozofii we Lwowie. Przegląd Filozoficzny, XLIV, 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden, R. (1919). Dążenia fenomenologów. Przegląd Filozoficzny, XXIII(3), 118–156; reprinted in: Ingarden, R. (1962). Z badań nad filozofią współczesną. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanyk, S. (2014). Filozofowie ukraińscy w Szkole Lwowsko-Warszawskiej. Warszawa: Semper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jadacki, J. J., & Paśniczek, J. (2006). The Lvov-Warsaw School—The new generation. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1930). Historische Anmerkungen. Erkenntnis, I, 311–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreiah, A. R. (1991). Logic and philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy, 29, 149–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struve, H. (1911). Słówko o filozofii narodowej polskiej. Ruch Filozoficzny, I, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatarkiewicz, W., & Tatarkiewicz, T. (1979). Wspomnienia. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowski, K. (1911). Jeszcze słówko o polskiej filozofii narodowej. Ruch Filozoficzny, I, 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowski, K. (1918). O potrzebach filozofii polskiej. Nauka Polska, I, 453–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witwicki, W. (1920). Kazimierz Twardowski. Przegląd Filozoficzny, XXIII, IX–XIX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woleński, J. (1985). Filozoficzna szkoła lwowsko-warszawska. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woleński, J. (1989). Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov-Warsaw School. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woleński, J. (1997). Szkoła lwowsko-warszawska w polemikach. Warszawa: Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zegzuła-Nowak, J. (2017). Polemiki filozoficzne Henryka Elzenberga ze szkołą Lwowsko-warszawską. Kraków: Scriptum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Woleński .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Woleński, J. (2019). Lvov-Warsaw School: Historical and Sociological Comments. In: Drabarek, A., Woleński, J., Radzki, M. (eds) Interdisciplinary Investigations into the Lvov-Warsaw School. History of Analytic Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24486-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics