Abstract
No one informed the dinosaurs that their thermal insulation could someday be useful for another purpose, yet their feathers developed into wings. This example describes exaptation, the discovery of new uses for existing traits; complementary to adaptation. The former, which is similar to opportunity recognition, and the latter, which follows environmental demands, are paths of knowledge utilization. Following the notion of exaptive repurposing of knowledge in internationalization, this study illustrates how internationalizing emerging markets change a firm’s behavior from adaptive to exaptive, offering a systematic theory to analyze organizational behavior in a variety of contexts. This study illustrates how a change from developed to emerging locations demands new uses for existing knowledge. This expansion creates further possibilities for additional expansions to developing economies in a similar state. This is particularly important since it illustrates how organizations from developed markets adopt a behavior more similar to ones originating from emerging markets, such as the capability to deal with political instability. However, this process can take a significantly long time. Therefore, we suggest exaptation is an essential concept in understanding organizational learning patterns in emerging markets and that capabilities learned in emerging economies can further leverage organizational capabilities in other emerging locations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management,43, 39–58.
Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. (2002). The emergence of emerging technologies. California Management Review,45, 50–66.
Aldrich, H., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Anderson, N., Potocnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management,40, 1297–1333.
Andriani, P., Ali, A., & Mastrogiorgio, M. (2017). Measuring exaptation and its impact on innovation, search, and problem solving. Organization Science,28, 320–338.
Andriani, P., & Carignani, G. (2014). Modular exaptation: A missing link in the synthesis of artificial form. Research Policy,43, 1608–1620.
Andriani, P., & Cattani, G. (2016). Exaptation as source of creativity, innovation, and diversity: Introduction to the Special Section. Industrial and Corporate Change,25, 115–131.
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy,43, 1097–1108.
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision,47, 1323–1339.
Boumgarden, P., Nickerson, J., & Zenger, T. (2012). Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal,33, 587–610.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research,6, 97–113.
Buckley, P., Clegg, L., Cross, A., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies,38, 499–518.
Cattani, G. (2006). Technological pre-adaptation, speciation, and emergence of new technologies: How Corning invented and developed fiber optics. Industrial and Corporate Change,15, 285–318.
Campbell, D. (1969). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. General Systems,14, 69–85.
Campbell, N., & Reece, J. 2005. Biology (7th ed., p. 482). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 567–586.
Contractor, F. (2007). Is international business good for companies? The evolutionary or multi-stage theory of internationalization vs. the transaction cost perspective. Management International Review,47, 453–475.
Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Denzin, N. (2009). The research act: A theoretical orientation to sociological methods. New York: Routledge.
Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2008). Outlines of a behavioral theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,66, 37–59.
Dew, N., & Sarasvathy, S. (2016). Exaptation and niche construction: Behavioral insights for an evolutionary theory. Industrial and Corporate Change,25, 167–179.
Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2004). The economic implications of exaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,14, 69–84.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review,14, 532–550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
Felin, T., Kauffman, S., Mastrogiorgio, A., & Mastrogiorgio, M. (2016). Factor markets, actors, and affordances. Industrial and Corporate Change,25, 133–147.
Ganzaroli, A., De Noni, I., & Pilotti, L. 2014. The role of social entrepreneurship in leveraging exaptation in locked-in industrial districts: The case of Idrogenet in the industrial district of Lumezzane. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27, 254–274.
Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. (2016). Technological exaptation: A narrative approach. Industrial and Corporate Change,25, 149–166.
Grandori, A. (2007). Discovery in natural selection and knowledge processes: A commentary on ‘an agent-based model of exaptive processes’. European Management Review,4, 153–156.
Guillén, M. (2005). The rise of Spanish multinationals: European business in the global economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Guillén, M., & García-Canal, E. (2009). The American model of the multinational firm and the “new” multinationals from emerging economies. The Academy of Management Perspectives,23, 23–35.
Gulati, R., & Puranam, P. (2009). Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science,20, 422–440.
Gould, S., & Vrba, E. (1982). Exaptation—A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology,8, 4–15.
Hammersley, M. (2008). Troubles with triangulation. In M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research (pp. 22–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. (2005). Cultures and organizations—Software of the mind: Intercultural co-operation and its importance for survival (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–81.
Korhonen, J., & Snäkin, J. (2005). Analysing the evolution of industrial ecosystems: Concepts and application. Ecological Economics,52, 169–186.
Lecraw, D. (1993). Outward direct investment by Indonesian firms: Motivation and effects. Journal of International Business Studies,24, 589–600.
Levinthal, D. (1998). The slow pace of rapid technological change: Gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Industrial and Corporate Change,7, 217–247.
Lewin, A., & Volberda, H. (2003). The future of organization studies: Beyond the selection-adaptation debate. In H. Tsoukas & C. Knudsen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (pp. 568–595). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lloyd, L., & Gould, S. (2017). Exaptation revisited: Changes imposed by evolutionary psychologist and behavioral biologist. Biological Theory,12, 50–65.
Madsen, T., & Servais, P. (1997). The internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary process? International Business Review,6, 561–583.
March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,2, 71–87.
Marquis, C., & Huang, Z. (2010). Acquisitions as exaptation: The legacy of founding institutions in the US commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal,53, 1441–1473.
Mastrogiorgio, M., & Gilsing, V. (2016). Innovation through exaptation and its determinants: The role of technological complexity, analogy making & patent scope. Research Policy,45, 1419–1435.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London, UK: Sage.
Mokyr, J. (2000). Evolutionary phenomenon in technological change. In J. Ziman (Ed.), Technological innovation as an evolutionary process (pp. 52–65). New York: Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (2019). Net national income (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/af9be38a-en. Accessed on 23 May 2019.
O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives,27, 324–338.
Patton, M. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work,1, 261–283.
Read, S., Song, M., & Smit, W. (2009). A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(6), 573–587.
Santangelo, G., & Meyer, K. (2017). Internationalization as an evolutionary process. Journal of International Business Studies,48, 1114–1130.
Santangelo, G., & Stucchi, T. (2018). Internationalization through exaptation: The role of domestic geographical dispersion in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies,49, 753–760.
Sarasvathy, S. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review,26, 243–263.
Sarasvathy, S., & Dew, N. (2005). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,15, 533–565.
Siggelkow, N. (2002). Evolution toward fit. Administrative Science Quarterly,47, 25–159.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Svejnar, J. (2002). Transition economies: Performance and challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives,16, 3–28.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods research: Contemporary issues in a emerging field. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 285–300). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vahlne, J.-E., & Johanson, J. (2017). The internationalization process 1977–2017: The Uppsala model 40 years later. Journal of International Business Studies,48, 1087–1102.
Van de Ven, A., & Poole, M. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review,20, 510–540.
Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth,3, 119–138.
Yin, R. (2011). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aaltonen, P., Torkkeli, L., Worek, M. (2020). The Effect of Emerging Economies Operations on Knowledge Utilization: The Behavior of International Companies as Exaptation and Adaptation. In: Marinov, M.A., Marinova, S.T., Larimo, J.A., Leposky, T. (eds) International Business and Emerging Economy Firms. Palgrave Studies of Internationalization in Emerging Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24482-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24482-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24481-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24482-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)