Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Business and Emerging Economy Firms pp 19–47Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Multinational Enterprise and Inclusive Innovation at the Bottom of the Pyramid: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Motivated by the increasing number of calls for focusing our research to address the Grand Challenges of modern society, this paper reviews the literature on inclusive innovation from the perspective of multinational enterprise as a focal actor. In this paper, the concept of inclusive innovation (any innovation that integrates otherwise marginalized groups of people into economic processes) is seen as a solution for otherwise excluded members of our society to be integrated into some aspect of the innovation. The most populous, but also the poorest markets of economically and socially excluded people are usually referred to as the bottom of the pyramid (BOP). While poverty and social inequality are the Grand Challenges for our society, we believe that inclusive innovation initiatives led by multinationals can be a part of a solution for the BOP markets. Being interested both in fostering innovation and developing new markets, multinational enterprises seem to have not only an intrinsic motivation but also required resources for the development of inclusive innovation at the BOP. This systematic literature review synthesizes available research from business and management journals, aiming to enhance our understanding of the activities of multinational enterprises in the attainment of inclusive innovation at the BOP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnihotri, A. (2015). Low-cost innovation in emerging markets. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23(5), 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, P., & Engberg, R. (2016). Frugal innovation and knowledge transferability: Innovation for emerging markets using home-based R&D western firms aiming to develop products for emerging markets may face knowledge transfer barriers that favor a home-based approach to frugal innovation. Research-Technology Management, 59(1), 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, A. D., & Andersen, P. D. (2017). Foresighting for inclusive development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,119, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeli, F., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2015). Competitive dynamics between MNCs and domestic companies at the base of the pyramid: An institutional perspective. Long Range Planning,48(3), 182–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeli, F., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2016). Business model innovation for inclusive health care delivery at the bottom of the pyramid. Organization & Environment,29(4), 486–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, B., & Kazmi, S. B. A. (2012). Performing citizenship. Business and Society,51(3), 450–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. (2006). From protection to innovation: BT’s journey in corporate social responsibility. Global Business and Organizational Excellence,26(1), 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Doh, J. P., & Benischke, M. H. (2017). Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9), 1045–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Easton, P. L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,41, 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy, B., & Coughlan, S. (2011). Emerging market strategy: Innovating both products and delivery systems. Strategy & Leadership,40(1), 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chataway, J., Hanlin, R., & Kaplinsky, R. (2014). Inclusive innovation: An architecture for policy development. Innovation and Development,4(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, M. Y. C., Watanabe, C., & Tou, Y. (2011). The challenges in Singapore NEWater development: Co-evolutionary development for innovation and industry evolution. Technology in Society,33(3–4), 200–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conceição, P., Heitor, M. V., & Veloso, F. (2003). Infrastructures, incentives, and institutions: Fostering distributed knowledge bases for the learning society. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,70(7), 583–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellermann, D. (2017). Going East: A framework for reverse innovation in SMEs. Journal of Business Strategy,38(3), 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J., Husted, B. W., Matten, D., & Santoro, M. (2010). Ahoy there! Toward greater congruence and synergy between international business and business ethics theory and research. Business Ethics Quarterly,20(3), 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2017). The 2017 EU industrial R&D investment scoreboard. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C., & Heeks, R. (2013). Innovation and scaling of ICT for the bottom-of-the-pyramid. Journal of Information Technology,28(4), 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, H., Haldimann, M., & Saul, C. J. (2017). Business model innovations for overcoming barriers in the base-of-the-pyramid market. Industry and Innovation, 24(5), 543–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, H., & Reynoso, J. (2013). An agenda for service research at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Service Management,24(5), 482–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, H., Saul, C., Halidmann, M., & Kramer, S. (2017). When one business model is not enough for a social business. Strategic Direction, 33(1), 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Mcgahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri, P. N., & Buckley, P. J. (2006). Globalization, multinational enterprises and world poverty. In S. C. Jain & S. Vachani (Eds.), Multinational corporations and global poverty reduction (pp. 204–232). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (2017). Returns on social development initiatives of MNEs: Issues and perspectives. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal,20(2), 126–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R., & Vernis, A. (2016). Innovations to serve low-income citizens: When corporations leave their comfort zones. Long Range Planning,49(3), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., Matos, S. V., & Martin, M. J. C. (2014). Innovation pathways at the base of the pyramid: Establishing technological legitimacy through social attributes. Technovation,34(5–6), 284–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halme, M., Kourula, A., Lindeman, S., Kallio, G., Lima-Toivanen, M., & Korsunova, A. (2016). Sustainability innovation at the base of the pyramid through multi-sited rapid ethnography. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,23(2), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halme, M., Lindeman, S., & Linna, P. (2012). Innovation for inclusive business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 743–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, S. H. E., & Kale, D. (2015). Regulating in developing countries: Multiple roles for medical research and products regulation in Argentina and India. Technology in Society,43, 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R., Amalia, M., Kintu, R., & Shah, N. (2013). Inclusive innovation: Definition, conceptualisation and future research priorities (No. 53). Development Informatics, Manchester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R., Foster, C., & Nugroho, Y. (2014). New models of inclusive innovation for development. Innovation and Development,4(2), 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, T. (2010). The “creative capitalism” corporate governance model. International Journal of Law and Management,52(2), 110–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T. L., & Mudambi, R. (2010). Far from Silicon Valley. Journal of International Management,16(4), 321–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., Simula, H., & Halme, M. (2016). Can frugal go global? Diffusion patterns of frugal innovations. Technology in Society,46, 132–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaruzelski, B., Schwartz, K., & Staack, V. (2015). The 2015 Global Innovation 1000—Innovation’s new world order. Strategy& (October), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, S. K., & Krishnan, R. T. (2013). Local innovation: The key to globalisation. IIMB Management Review, 25(4), 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, R. (2011). Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Research Policy,40(2), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2007). The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: How the private sector can help alleviate poverty. California Management Review,49(4), 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2011). Fighting poverty together: Rethinking strategies for business, governments, and civil society to reduce poverty. New York, US: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business,51(1), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2014). Reviewing a decade of research on the “base/bottom of the pyramid” (BOP) concept. Business and Society,53(3), 338–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufs, K., & Schwens, C. (2014). Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Business Review,23(6), 1109–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, B. (2014). India: MNC strategies for growth and innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 42(2), 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C., Han, S., & Ito, H. (2013). Capability building through innovation for unserved lower end mega markets. Technovation,33(12), 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, T., & Hart, S. L. (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 350–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Duarte, C., Vidal-Suárez, M. M., & González-Díaz, B. (2016). International business and national culture: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews,18(4), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorentz, H., Kumar, M., & Srai, J. S. (2017). Managing distance in international purchasing and supply: A systematic review of literature from the resource-based view perspective. International Business Review, 27, 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, O. R. (2017). When Davids start becoming Goliaths: Unique capabilities of emerging-market multinational enterprises and how they foster growth in developed markets? International Journal of Technology Management, 74(1/2/3/4), 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, C., & Pastoriza, D. (2016). International involvement of established SMEs: A systematic review of antecedents, outcomes and moderators. International Business Review,25(2), 458–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, R. U. (2011). Why do the poor pay more? Exploring the poverty penalty concept. Journal of International Development,23(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. (2004). Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies,35(4), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, D. (2009). Dead aid: Why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. New York, US: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahi, T. (2016). Cocreation at the base of the pyramid: Reviewing and organizing the diverse conceptualizations. Organization and Environment,29(4), 416–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nari Kahle, H., Dubiel, A., Ernst, H., & Prabhu, J. (2013). The democratizing effects of frugal innovation. Journal of Indian Business Research,5(4), 220–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R., & Zanfei, A. (2005). Globalization of innovation: The role of multinational enterprises. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 318–345). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndyabawe, K., & Kisaalita, W. S. (2014). Diffusion of an evaporative cooler innovation among smallholder dairy farmers of Western Uganda. Technology in Society,38, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, M. J., & Rodríguez, A. (2011). Offshoring of RD: Looking abroad to improve innovation performance. Journal of International Business Studies,42(3), 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojha, A. K. (2014). MNCs in India: Focus on frugal innovation. Journal of Indian Business Research,6(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oodith, P. D., & Parumasur, S. B. (2014). Being on top of your game at the bottom of the pyramid. Corporate Ownership and Control, 11(3C), 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2015). Framing resource-constrained innovation at the “bottom of the pyramid”: Insights from an ethnographic case study in rural Bangladesh. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,92, 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pels, J., & Sheth, J. N. (2017). Business models to serve low-income consumers in emerging markets. Marketing Theory,17(3), 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervez, T., Maritz, A., & De Waal, A. (2013). Innovation and social entrepreneurship at the bottom of the pyramid—A conceptual framework. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences,16(5), 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisani, N., Kourula, A., Kolk, A., & Meijer, R. (2017). How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 591–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, J., & Jain, S. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: Understanding jugaad. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,32(4), 843–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–57, 124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy+Business Magazine, 26, 273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Mashelkar, R. A. (2010). Innovation’s Holy Grail. Harvard Business Review, 88, 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarshie, A. M., Salmi, A., & Leuschner, R. (2016). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics journals. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,22(2), 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabino, S. (2015). The bottom of the pyramid: An integrative approach. International Journal of Emerging Markets,10(1), 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, K., Chu, M., & Petkoski, D. (2011). Segmenting the base of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review,89(June), 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, B. C. (2017). Advances in science and technology through frugality. IEEE Engineering Management Review,45(1), 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, P. K., & Ray, S. (2010). Resource-constrained innovation for emerging economies: The case of the Indian Telecommunications Industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,57(1), 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reficco, E., & Gutiérrez, R. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity and the elusive quest for successful implementation of BoP ventures. Organization & Environment, 29(4), 461–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, S. E., & Ramani, S. V. (2012). The harnessing of biotechnology in India: Which roads to travel? Technological Forecasting and Social Change,79(4), 648–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynoso, J., Kandampully, J., Fan, X., & Paulose, H. (2015). Learning from socially driven service innovation in emerging economies. Journal of Service Management,26(1), 156–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rong, K., Liu, Z., & Shi, Y. (2011). Reshaping the business ecosystem in China: Case studies and implications. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China,2(2), 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosca, E., Arnold, M., & Bendul, J. C. (2017). Business models for sustainable innovation—An empirical analysis of frugal products and services. Journal of Cleaner Production,162, S133–S145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, P., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). Business model innovation and sources of value creation in low-income markets. European Management Review,7(3), 138–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, F. (2014). Innovation for inclusive development. Innovation and Development,4(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitanidi, M. M., & Lindgreen, A. (2010). Editorial: Cross-sector social interactions. Journal of Business Ethics,94(S1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management,31(6), 849–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre, B. S., & Neto, R. E. S. (2014). Capability accumulation, innovation, and technology diffusion: Lessons from a base of the pyramid cluster. Technovation,34(5–6), 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simanis, E., & Duke, D. (2014). Profits at the bottom of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 92(10), 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Employment, social justice and societal well-being. International Labour Review,141(1–2), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Assessing India’s lead market potential for cost-effective innovations. Journal of Indian Business Research,4(2), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2015). UNESCO Global Science Report: Towards 2030.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2016). The sustainable development goals report 2016 (Vol. 2016). United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Waeyenberg, S., & Hens, L. (2008). Crossing the bridge to poverty, with low‐cost cars. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(7), 439–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Waeyenberg, S., & Hens, L. (2012). Overcoming institutional distance: Expansion to base-of-the-pyramid markets. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 1692–1699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (2004). Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality? World Development,32(4), 567–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wale, L. E., & Makina, D. (2017). Account ownership and use of financial services among individuals: Evidence from selected Sub-Saharan African economies. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 8(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. W., Kistruck, G. M., Ireland, R. D., & Ketchen, D. J. J. (2010). The entrepreneurship process in base of the pyramid markets: The case of multinational enterprise/nongovernment organization alliances. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,34(3), 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. L., Omar, M., & Ensor, J. (2011). Sourcing or selling: The value flame at the base of the pyramid. Marketing Intelligence & Planning,29(3), 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Sina Mortazavi, Igor Laine, Anne Quarshie & Juha Väätänen

  2. Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle University, London, UK

    Suraksha Gupta

Authors
  1. Sina Mortazavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Igor Laine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anne Quarshie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juha Väätänen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suraksha Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sina Mortazavi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Marin A. Marinov

  2. Aalborg Business School, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Svetla T. Marinova

  3. Faculty of Business Studies, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland

    Jorma A. Larimo

  4. School of Marketing and Communication, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland

    Tiina Leposky

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mortazavi, S., Laine, I., Quarshie, A., Väätänen, J., Gupta, S. (2020). Multinational Enterprise and Inclusive Innovation at the Bottom of the Pyramid: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Marinov, M.A., Marinova, S.T., Larimo, J.A., Leposky, T. (eds) International Business and Emerging Economy Firms. Palgrave Studies of Internationalization in Emerging Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24482-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation