Abstract
In opposition to the main approaches to European integration, in this contribution I will adopt a perspective closer to contentious politics in order to emphasise the role that non-institutional actors may have in this process. In particular, I will try to investigate how, in recent years, the relationship between the European Union and the so-called social movements has changed. In fact, the latter often have taken positions that can be described in terms of a critical and radical Europeanism. I intend to focus on two paths of mobilisation that, in recent years, have combined opposition to EU policies with a pro-European tension: Blockupy and neo-municipalism. The first had an immediate transnational vocation and experienced a convergence between a plurality of actors (parties, collectives, trade unions, associations). The development of this European network developed in parallel with and in opposition to the imposition of austerity policies. After this phase of emergency crisis management moment of crisis emergency management, the contentious rejection of the neo-liberal policies of the EU seems to have moved to a more local level. The term “neo-municipalism” acts as an umbrella for a series of political experimentations across Europe, which aim to restore power to the many urban experiences of social commitment. In both cases, there is a field of tension between a transnational attitude and European institutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balibar, E. (2016). Crisi e fine dell’Europa? Bollati Boringhieri.
Bergmann, J., Niemann, A. (2013). Theories of European integration and their contribution to the study of European Foreign Policy. Paper prepared for the 8th Pan-European Conference on International Relations, Warsaw 2013.
Caccia, G. (2016). Europa der Kommunen. Von Bürgerplattformen zu rebellischen Städten. LuXemburg. Gesellschaftsanalyse und Linke Praxis, 2, 68–73.
Carey, S. (2002). Undivided loyalties. Is national identity an obstacle to European integration? European Union Politics, 12(3–4):387–413.
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2016). Ce cauchemar qui n’en finit pas. La Decouverte: Comment le néolibéralisme défait la démocratie.
Della Porta, D. (2006a). Quale Europa? Europeizzazione, identità e conflitti. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Della Porta, D. (2006b). Social movements and the European Union. Policy paper 22, Notre Europe.
Della Porta, D., Caiani, M. (2007). Europeanization from below? Social movements and Europe. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 12(1), 1–20.
Diez Medrano, J. (2003). Framing Europe. Attitudes to European integration in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom. Princeton University Press.
Eichenberg, R. C., & Dalton, R. J. (1993). Europeans and the European community: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization, 47(4), 507–534.
FitzGibbon, J., Leruth, B., Stratin, N. (2017). Euroscepticism as a transnational and a Pan-European Phenomenon. Routledge.
Genschel, C. (2014). Blockupy and beyond. https://www.tni.org/en/article/blockupy-and-beyond. Accessed 15 Nov 2018.
Gutierrez B (2014) Network movements and the new ‘social atmosphere’. https://www.tni.org/en/article/network-movements-and-new-social-atmosphere. Accessed 15 Nov 2018.
Harvey, D. (2015). Consolidating power. Roar Magazine, 269–282.
Le Torrec, V., et al. (2001). Framing Europe: News coverage and legitimacy of the European Union in five countries. Paper presented at the European Community Studies Association, Madison, Wisc. May 31–June 2.
Mayer, M. (2013). First world urban activism. Beyond austerity urbanism and creative city politics. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 17(1):5–19.
Mullis, D., et al. (2016). Social protest and its policing in the heart of the European crisis regime. The case of Blockupy in Frankurt. Political Geography, 55, 50–59.
Nehemiah, Y., et al. (2016). Convergence as organization. Blockupy against the ECB. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36.
Neumayer, C., Rossi, L., Karlsson, B. (2016a). When the police hijacked #Blockupy Frankfurt. In: Democratic public sphere: current challenges and prospects (pp. 405–431). Aarhus University Press.
Neumayer, C., Rossi, L., Karlsson, B. (2016b). Contested Hashtag—Blockupy Frankfurt in social media. International Journal of Communication, 10.
Pietiläinen, J. (2017). What is left in Europe: a comparative analysis of survey data on left self-location. In: Baier, W., Müller, W., Himmelstoss, E. (Eds.), The left, the people, populism: Past and present. Transform Europe Yearbook.
Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European integration. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Russell, B., Reyes, O. (2017). Fearless cities: The new urban movements. Red Pepper, Aug 2017. http://www.redpepper.org.uk/fearless-cities-the-new-urban-movements/. Accessed 15 Nov 2018.
Schmitter, P. C. (1971). A revised theory of regional integration. In L. N. Lindberg & S. A. Scheingold (Eds.), Regional integration: Theory and research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shea Baird, K. (2015) Rebel cities: The citizens platform in power. Red Pepper, Dec 2015. http://www.redpepper.org.uk/rebel-cities-the-citizen-platforms-in-power/. Accessed November 15, 2018.
Skærlund Risager, B. (2017) Mobilizing for a ‘Europe from below’: network, territory, and place in the anti-austerity Blockupy movement. Space and Polity, 22(1), 67–85.
Tarrow, S. (1994) Power in movement. Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational contention. Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pirone, M. (2020). Paths of Critical Europeanism: From Blockupy to Neo-municipalism. In: Baldassari, M., Castelli, E., Truffelli, M., Vezzani, G. (eds) Anti-Europeanism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24428-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24428-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24427-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24428-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)