Advertisement

Electron and Photon Energy Calibration

  • Stefano ManzoniEmail author
Chapter
  • 112 Downloads
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

The precise reconstruction of the energy of electrons and photons is a key ingredient for many physics measurement, such as the accurate determination of the Higgs and W boson masses. The photon and electron energy measurement by the EM calorimeter is limited by several effects. In particular the finite dimension of the cluster and the presence of inactive material upstream of and inside the calorimeter worsen the energy reconstruction performance. Figure 7.1 illustrates the four main components that affect the linearity and the resolution of the final energy measurement

References

  1. 1.
    Turra R, Meroni C, Fanti M (2013) Energy calibration and observation of the Higgs boson in the diphoton decay with the ATLAS experiment. PhD thesis, Università degli studi di Milano. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1517442. Presented 18 Feb 2013
  2. 2.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2014) Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS detector using LHC Run 1 data. Eur Phys J C74(10):3071.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3071-4, arXiv:1407.5063 [hep-ex]
  3. 3.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2019) Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS detector using 2015-2016 LHC proton-proton collision data. JINST 14(03): P03017.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/14/03/P03017, arXiv:1812.03848 [hep-ex]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aharrouche M, Adam-Bourdarios C, Aleksa M, Banfi D, Benchekroun D et al (2010) Measurement of the response of the ATLAS liquid argon barrel calorimeter to electrons at the 2004 combined test-beam. Nucl Instrum Meth A614(3):400–432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.12.055ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Courneyea L, Dannheim D, Delmastro M, Elles S, Gouighri M, Iconomidou-Fayard L, Koletsou I, Lampl W, Liang Z, March L, Strizenec P, Tarrade F, Ueno R, Vincter M, Weng Z, Zhang H (2010) Computation and validation of the electronic calibration constants for the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeters, vol 7. Technical report ATL-LARG-INT-2010-007, CERN, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Quinlan J (1987) Simplifying decision trees. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 27(3):221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R (1984) Classification and regression trees. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoecker A, Speckmayer P, Stelzer J, Therhaag J, von Toerne E, Voss H (2007) TMVA: Toolkit for multivariate data analysis. PoS ACAT . 040. http://tmva.sourceforge.net/, arXiv:physics/0703039
  9. 9.
    Huber PJ (1964) Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann Math Stat 35:73–101.  https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177703732MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    GEANT4 Collaboration, Agostinelli S et al (2003) GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Meth A506:250–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allison J et al (2006) Geant4 developments and applications. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 53:270.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2006.869826ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2016) Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS detector using data collected in 2015 at \(\sqrt{s} = 13\) TeV. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-015. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2203514
  13. 13.
    Thain D, Tannenbaum T, Livny M (2005) Distributed computing in practice: the Condor experience. Concurr-Pract Exp 17(2–4):323–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson KJ, Batkova L, Cavalli-Sforza M, Carli T, Cascella M, Davidek T, Del Prete T, Djobava T, Dotti A, Febbraro R, Gollub N, Hakobyan H, Henriques A, Hurwitz MH, Isaev A, Jen-La Plante I, Karyukhin A, Khandanyan H, Khramov J, Kulchitsky Y, Makouski M, Mosidze M, Myagkov A, Pilcher JE, Pribyl L, Rullgard M, Santoni C, Shalanda N, Solodkov A, Solovyanov O, Starchenko J, Stavina P, Simonyan M, Teuscher R, Tsiareshka P, Vichou E, Vinogradov V, Vivarelli I, Volpi M, Zenis T (2008) Calibration of ATLAS tile calorimeter at electromagnetic scale, Technical report. ATL-TILECAL-PUB-2009-001. ATL-COM-TILECAL-2008-016, CERN, Geneva. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1139228
  15. 15.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2010) Readiness of the ATLAS tile calorimeter for LHC collisions. Eur Phys J C70:1193–1236.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1508-y, arXiv:1007.5423 [physics.ins-det]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fischer C (2016) Study of TileCal scintillators irradiation using the Minimum Bias integrators, Technical report ATL-TILECAL-PROC-2016-006, CERN, Geneva. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2160267
  17. 17.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2017) Measurement of material up to the first layer of the EM calorimeter using 2015 and 2016 data, Technical report. https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PLOTS/EGAM-2017-007/index.html
  18. 18.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2017) Measurement of the Higgs boson mass in the \(H \rightarrow ZZ^{*} \rightarrow 4\ell \) and \(H \rightarrow \gamma \gamma \) channels with \(\sqrt{s} = 13~\text{TeV}\)\(pp\) collisions using the ATLAS detector. ATLAS-CONF-2017-046. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2273853

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nikhef—National Institute for Subatomic Physics (NL)AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations