Skip to main content

Geometric Visualization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Science and Visual Computing

Part of the book series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing ((BRIEFSAIKP))

  • 1223 Accesses

Abstract

While visualization is applicable to any type of data, examining and interacting with geometric data require specialized approaches. Geometric data visualization produces images from a collection of mathematical models, which can be defined interactively or through a set of stored textual commands. Fundamentally, geometric visualization transforms mathematical models into images. Massive model visualization offers interactive performance for visualizing an essentially unlimited amount of geometry. Interactive manipulation assists a person in understanding the nature of an entire 3D model, and allows users to develop models for concept, design, engineering, assembly, and support. The vast majority of devices rely on 2D projections that users must mentally map back into 3D, so a productive interface to the display and the image is a prerequisite for successful design and implementation. Color maps can be used to represent value ranges in order to assist comprehension. Guidelines have been developed from the areas of art and design and applied productively to seeing, drawing, and communicating through geometric and non-geometric images. The earliest solid modeling systems were based on canonical forms that could be assembled through combinatorial solid geometry. Surface representation is important to many application domains because shape can be significant for aerodynamics and aesthetics. Defining and manipulating complex surfaces and shapes have been an area of significant interest throughout the history of Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM). One objective of CAD/CAM is to reap the benefits and cost reductions through design process efficiency. This is particularly important for the automotive and aerospace industries because of the large scale of the products and services that are involved. These industries have pushed the CAD/CAM boundaries in many areas of representation, modeling, and display. Other industry sectors (e.g., shipbuilding, buildings, arts, and entertainment) have benefited from the pioneering work in these areas. This is an illustration of how significant developments in geometric visualization apply across industry domains and the cost/benefits and advantages that accrue to national and international industry. It is also an example of technology transfer, where state-of-the-art research and development has been effectively moved into advanced products and services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sutherland, I.E.: Sketchpad: A Man-Machine Graphical Communication System. MIT, Cambridge, MA (1963, 2003). https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-574.pdf

  2. Krull, F.N.: The origin of computer graphics within General Motors. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 16 (3), 40–56 (1994) (IEEE, New York, NY). https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=612564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weisberg, D.E.: The Engineering Design Revolution (2008). http://www.cadhistory.net/

  4. Dill, J., Kasik, D.: Discovering and transitioning technology, Chapter 27. In: Expanding the Frontiers of Visual Analytics and Visualization. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2012). https://www.springer.com/us/book/9781447128038

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. ICMRIndia: The Making of the 777. http://www.icmrindia.org/casestudies/catalogue/Operations/Making%20of%20Boeing%20777-Operations%20Management%20Case%20Studies.htm

  6. http://www.fracturemechanics.org/hole.html

  7. https://www.poolzoom.com/polaris-360-replacement-pool-cleaner-parts.html

  8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_visualization

  9. Preparata, F.P., Shamos, M.I.: Computational Geometry: An Introduction, 1st edn. Springer, New York, NY (1985). ISBN 0-387-96131-3 (5th printing, corrected and expanded, 1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Mastin, L.: The Story of Mathematics (2010). https://www.storyofmathematics.com/, https://www.storyofmathematics.com/story.html

  11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_Data_Limited

  12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasolid

  13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_Applications_Group

  14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tron

  15. http://www.bbc.com/autos/story/20161111-why-car-designers-stick-with-clay

  16. Blomgren, R.M., Kasik, D.J.: Early investigation, formulation, and use of NURBS at Boeing. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 36(3), 27–32 (2002) (ACM, New York, NY). https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=570345

  17. de Boor, C.: A Practical Guide to Splines. Springer, New York, NY (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACIS

  19. Lee, A., Moreton, H., Hoppe, H.: Displaced subdivision surfaces. In: ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 27 Special Issue, Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp 85–94. ACM, New York, NY (2000). https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=344779.344829, http://hhoppe.com/dss.pdf

  20. Mandelbrot, B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W.H. Freeman & Co Ltd., London, UK (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Crilly, A.J., Earnshaw, R.A., Jones, H. (eds.): Fractals and Chaos. Springer, New York, NY (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Falconer, K.: Fractals: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. https://kottke.org/09/07/vol-libre-an-amazing-cg-film-from-1980 (includes the online video)

  24. Carpenter, L.: Computer rendering of fractal curves and surfaces. In: ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 14, Special Issue. ACM, New York, NY (1980). http://old.siggraph.org/publications/rarities/carpenter-1980supp.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fournier, A., Fussell, D.: Stochastic modeling in computer graphics. In: ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 14, Special Issue, pp. 1–8. ACM, New York, NY (1980). http://old.siggraph.org/publications/rarities/fournier-fussell-1980supp.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blinn, J.F.: A generalization of algebraic surface drawing. ACM Trans. Graph. 1(3), 235–256 (1982) (ACM, New York, NY). https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=357306.357310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peddie, J.: The History of Visual Magic in Computers: How Beautiful Images are Made in CAD, 3D, VR and AR. Springer, London (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Massironi, M.: The Psychology of Graphic Images: Seeing, Drawing, Communicating. Psychology Press, Hove, UK (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map_projection

  30. Rensink, R.: Change blindness. In: Itti, L., Rees, G., Tsotsos, J.K. (eds.) Neurobiology of Attention, pp. 76–81. Academic Press, San Diego, CA (2005). https://philpapers.org/rec/ITTNOA

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Rayner, K., White, S.J. Johnson, R.L., Liversedge, S.P.: Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: there is a cost. Psychol. Sci. 17(3), 92–193 (2006). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16507057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Biederman, I., Shiffrar, M.M.: Sexing day-old chicks: a case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual-learning task. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 13(4), 640–645 (1987). http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.640

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stevens, P.S.: Patterns in Nature. Little Brown & Co., New York, NY (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kasik, D.J., Troy, J.J., Amorosi, S.R., Murray, M.O., Swamy, S.N.: Evaluating graphics displays for complex 3D models. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 22(3), 56–64 (2002) (IEEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2002.999788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Swindells, C., Po, B.A., Hajshirmohammadi, I., Corrie, B., Dill, J.C., Fisher, B.D., Booth, K.S.: Comparing CAVE, wall, and desktop displays for navigation and wayfinding in complex 3D models. In: Proceedings of Computer Graphics International Conference, 420–427, (2004). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232656533/download, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1309243

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Kasik .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kasik, D. (2019). Geometric Visualization. In: Data Science and Visual Computing. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24367-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24367-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24366-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24367-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics