Skip to main content

The Model for Risk Management and Mastering Them in Supply Chain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integration of Information Flow for Greening Supply Chain Management

Part of the book series: EcoProduction ((ECOPROD))

  • 850 Accesses

Abstract

Every organization aims for successful and continued operations, therefore efficient supply chain management is essential as risks in supply chain represent one of the major issues in today’s businesses. In this chapter, on the one hand, a new risk management model is proposed in such a way that it takes into account different segments of the public and time-varying internal and external parameters from the observed system environment. On the other hand, a freely accessible catalog of risks in supply chains is described, which is based on the described new model. This model complies with the general risk management (ISO 31000) and supply chain security (ISO 28000) standards, while it also covers and includes recent findings from the risk management sphere of influence. The central concept of the model is an individual public exposed to individual risks. In the model, we determine what kind of a relationship a specific public has to some specific risk. Different publics have a different attitude to a specific risk—different publics have different exposures and different subjective uncertainties about a certain risk, even though objective uncertainty is the same for all public. In our model, we are assuming that risk is ultimately a characteristic of human beings and not of things or concepts as is the case with most of the existing risk management models. Human is not an object, but a self-aware subject with their own will, a power to do things and with his own exposure and risk acceptance. In addition, the model introduces functions which calculate new values of parameters and output on the basis of the given input and the accumulated history of the past processes’ life cycles. Later on, the model resolves if calculated tolerance levels for risks, impacts and process parameters are adequate for every determined segment of the public. Calculated results are based on the provided tolerance levels, while the parameters, functions and levels are assumed to be non-deterministic (i.e. parameters, functions and levels may change in time). Contemporarily to the model, a freely accessible experimental risk catalog was formed and published online based on practical research in authentic organizations. Here, risks that have been identified thus far are presented and described, while the catalog also enables joining and cooperation of the experts from the field into a community. Hence, the catalog is considered as an ever growing list of hypothetical risks that enables an insight into the model, its value and practice while it can also be used as a listing and/or starting point for establishing supply chain risk management in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benedetti L, Bixio D, Claeys F, Vanrolleghem PA (2008) Tools to support a model-based methodology for emission/immission and benefit/cost/risk analysis of wastewater systems that considers uncertainty. Environ Model Softw 23(8):1082–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluhm C, Overbeck L, Wagner C (2002) An introduction to credit risk modeling. CRC Press Company, Chapman Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnert A, Gatzert N, Hoyt RE, Lechner P (2019) The drivers and value of enterprise risk management: evidence from ERM ratings. Eur J Financ 25(3):234–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burcar Dunovic I, Radujkovic M, Vukomanovic M (2016) Internal and external risk based assessment and evaluation for the large infrastructure projects. J Civ Eng Manag 22(5):673–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Dictionary (2019) What is risk? definition and meaning—BusinessDictionary.com. URL http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/risk.html

  • Chopra S, Sodhi MS (2004) Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manag Rev

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo S (2019) The holistic risk analysis and modelling (HoRAM) method. Saf Sci 112:18–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corporation TAR (2010) The security auditor’s research assistant (sara). URL http://www-arc.com/sara/

  • Gordy MB (2003) A risk-factor model foundation for ratings-based bank capital rules. J Financ Intermed 12(3):199–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallikas J, Karvonen I, Pulkkinen U, Virolainen VM, Tuominen M (2004) Risk management processes in supplier networks. Int J Prod Econ 90(1):47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton GA (2004) Defining Risk. Financ Anal J 60(6):19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston DX, Mackulak GT, Collofello JS (2001) Stochastic simulation of risk factor potential effects for software development risk management. J Syst Softw 59(3):247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard DW (2009) The failure of risk management: why it’s broken and how to fix it. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • InvestorWords (2019) What is risk? Definition and meaning. URL http://www.investorwords.com/4292/risk.html

  • ISACA (2009) The risk of IT framework. ISACA, Rolling Meadows

    Google Scholar 

  • ISACA (2012) COBIT 5. ISACA, Rolling Meadows

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2007) ISO 28000 Specification for security management for the supply chain

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2009) IEC 31010:2009 Risk management—Risk assessment techniques

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2010) ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility. ISO

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2018a) ISO 31000: Risk management— Guidelines. ISO

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2018b) ISO27005:2018 Information technology—security techniques—information security risk management. ISO

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2018c) ISO/IEC 27000:2016(E) Information technology—security techniques—information security management systems. ISO

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorion P (2007) Value at risk: the new benchmark for managing financial risk, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1(1):11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Hart Schafner, and Marx, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luko SN (2016) Risk assessment techniques. Qual Eng 26(4):379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Mun J (2010) Modeling risk: applying risk simulation, strategic real options, stochastic forecasting, business analytics, and portfolio optimization. Gunn, Wiley-Finance

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritsker M (2006) The hidden dangers of historical simulation. J Bank Financ 30(2):561–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross SJ (2009) IS security matters: four little words. Inf Syst Control J 1:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlarman S (2009) IT Risk Exploration: the IT Risk Management Taxonomy and Evolution. Inf Syst Control J. 3:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott HS (2005) Capital adequacy beyond basel, banking, securities and insurance. Oxford University Press Inc, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silva JR, Silva AFD, Chan BL (2019) Enterprise risk management and firm value: evidence from Brazil. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 55(3):687–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia (2004) AS/NSZ 4360:2004—Risk management. Standards Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart A (2004) On risk: Perception and direction. Comput Secur 23(5):362–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swoboda B, Pop NA, Dabija DC (2010) Vertical alliances between retail and manufacturer. URL http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract{_}id = 2305261

  • Taleb N (2007) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random House USA Inc

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Borut Jereb .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jereb, B. (2020). The Model for Risk Management and Mastering Them in Supply Chain. In: Kolinski, A., Dujak, D., Golinska-Dawson, P. (eds) Integration of Information Flow for Greening Supply Chain Management. EcoProduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24355-5_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics