Skip to main content

Structural Relationship Data Analysis Between Relational Variables and Benefit Sharing: Moderating Effect of Transaction-Specific Investment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA 2019)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 845))

  • 558 Accesses

Abstract

As information exchange becomes more important in business-to-business relationships, it is necessary to analyze and manage various data and information about trading partners in depth. Recently, the characteristics of the competition have changed. There is a tendency to shift from competition between companies to competition between networks. Particularly, mutual cooperation and long-term relationship between suppliers-buyers are essential in the automobile industry, so the partnership relationship between companies is more important. Importance of strategic customers is increasing in the relationship between seller and buyer. However, theoretical and empirical studies are relatively inadequate in comparison with practical importance. Relational variables are becoming increasingly important in supplier-buyer transaction relationships. Especially, relational commitment and relational norms have a profound effect on cooperation activities such as benefit sharing and performance among companies. Although the importance of relationships with strategic customers is increasing, research on the effects of relationship characteristics with strategic customers on benefit sharing is relatively insufficient. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the structural relationship data analysis between relational variables and benefit sharing in the automobile industry, and to analyze the moderating effect of transaction-specific investment, and to suggest the theoretical and practical implications. For this purpose, data were collected for suppliers of Korea’s automobile parts. Based on the collected data, reliability analysis, validity analysis, correlation analysis and regression analysis were conducted. As a result of analysis, three hypotheses were supported. Finally, implications of the research are presented, and limitations and directions for future research are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gundlach, G. T., & Murphy, P. E. (1993). Ethical and legal foundations of relational marketing exchange. Journal of Marketing, 57, 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Workman, J. P., Homburg, C., & Jensen, O. (2003). Intraorganizatonal determinants of ket account management effectiveness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruekert, R. W., Walker, O. C., Jr., Orville, C., & Roering, K. J. (1995). The organization of marketing activities: A contingency theory of structure and performance. Journal of Marketing, 49, 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradford, K. D., Challagalla, G. N., Hunter, G. K., & Moncrief, III W. C. (2012) Strategic account management: conceptualizing, integrating, and extending the domain from fluid to dedicated accounts. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 32(1), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Napolitano, Lisa. (1997). Customer-supplier partnering: A strategy whose time has come. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 17, 1–8.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. McDonald, M. (2000). Key account management—A domain review. The Marketing Review, 1(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guenzi, P., Pardo, C., & Georges, L. (2007). Relational selling strategy and key account managers’ relational behaviors: An exploratory study. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, E., Richards, K. A., Halstead, D., & Fu, F. Q. (2009). Developing a strategic framework of key account performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 17(3–4), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guesalaga, Rodrigo. (2014). Top management involvement with key accounts: The concepts, its dimensions, ans strategic outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 1146–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., Jr., & Jensen, O. (2002). A configurational perspective on key account management. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guesalaga, R., & Johnston, W. (2010). What’s next in key account management research? Building the bridge between the academic literature and the practitioner’s priorities. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 1063–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Friend, S. B., & Johnson, J. S. (2014). Key account relationships: An exploratory inquiry of customer-based evaluations. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 642–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992). The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc. and.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80, 1095–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Macneil, I. R. (1980). The new social contract, an inquiry into modern contractual relations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bendor, J., & Mookherjee, D. (1990). Norm, third party sanctions, and cooperations. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 6(Spring), 33–63.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter? Journal of Marketing, 56, 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gibbs, J. P. (1981). Norms, deviance, and social control: Conceptual matters. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Achrol, R. S. (1997). Changes in the theory of interorganizational relations in marketing: toward a network paradigm. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(1), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Noordewier, T., John, G. G., & Nevin, J. R. (1990). Performance outcome of purchasing arrangement in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. Journal of Marketing, 154(4), 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this paper was provided by Namseoul university.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hae-Soo Pyun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pyun, HS. (2020). Structural Relationship Data Analysis Between Relational Variables and Benefit Sharing: Moderating Effect of Transaction-Specific Investment. In: Lee, R. (eds) Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications. SERA 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 845. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24344-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics