Skip to main content

Hydrologic Modeling with Transfer Function Based Approach: A Comparative Study over Godavari River Basin

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1066 Accesses

Part of the book series: Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems ((LAIS,volume 2))

Abstract

Hydrologic modeling (HM), which involves forming a nexus between two important components of hydrologic cycle viz. rainfall and runoff, is one of the most important steps, which provides realistic inputs for water distribution policies. A plethora of HM methodologies, categorized as ‘conceptual’ and ‘empirical’, have been proposed to estimate the fraction of rainfall, which would be available as surface runoff. However, intensive data requirements, mathematical interpretations of complicated physical processes, and assumptions that are likely to get violated under changing climatic and land-use land cover conditions render the application of conceptual models a cumbersome task. Under such conditions, empirical models play a crucial role in estimating the runoff with minimal data availability. Here, we use two transfer function based approaches viz. linear regression (LR) and kernel regression (KR) for estimating runoff over Godavari river basin. We find that LR outperforms its non-parametric counterpart in capturing long-term properties of observed runoff.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Machado F, Mine M, Kaviski E, Fill H (2011) Monthly rainfall–runoff modelling using artificial neural networks. Hydrol Sci J (J des Sci Hydrol) 56(3):349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.559949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman LK (1932) Streamflow from rainfall by unit hydrograph method. Eng News-Recod 108:501–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu KL, Gupta HV, Sorroshian S (1995) Artificial neural network modelling of the rainfall – runoff process. Water Resour Res 31(10):2517–2530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elshorbagy A, Simonovic SP, Panu US (2000) Performance evaluation of artificial neural networks for runoff prediction. J Hydrol Eng 5(4):424–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anmala J, Zhang B, Govindaraju RS (2000) Comparison of ANNs and empirical approaches for predicting watershed runoff. J Water Resour Plan Manag 126(3):156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokar AS, Markus M (2000) Precipitation – runoff modelling using artificial neural networks and conceptual models. J Hydrol Eng 5(2):156–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajurkar MP, Kothyari UC, Chaube UC (2002) Artificial neural network for daily rainfall–runoff modelling. Hydrol Sci J 47(6):865–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pai DS, Sridhar L, Rajeevan M, Sreejith OP, Satbhai NS, Mukhopadhyay B (2014) Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25° × 0.25°) long period (1901–2010) daily gridded rainfall data set over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region. Mausam 65(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, D.: A two‐dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data, Proc. 1968 ACM Nat. Conf., 517–524 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan S, Ghosh S, Mishra V, Salvi K (2014) Uncertainty resulting from multiple data usage in statistical downscaling. Geophys Res Lett 41:4013–4019. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvi K, Villarini G, Vecchi G, Ghosh S (2017) Decadal temperature predictions over the continental United States: analysis and enhancement. Clim Dyn https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3532-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvi K, Villarini G, Vecchi G (2017b) High resolution decadal precipitation predictions over the continental United States for impacts assessment. J Hydrol 553:559–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvi K, Kannan S, Ghosh S (2013) High-resolution multisite daily rainfall projections in India with statistical downscaling for climate change impacts assessment. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:3557–3578. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvi K, Ghosh S, Ganguly AR (2015) Credibility of statistical downscaling under nonstationary climate. Clim Dyn https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2688-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaustubh Salvi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lakeshri, C., Salvi, K. (2020). Hydrologic Modeling with Transfer Function Based Approach: A Comparative Study over Godavari River Basin. In: Satapathy, S., Raju, K., Molugaram, K., Krishnaiah, A., Tsihrintzis, G. (eds) International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering (ICETE). Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24314-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24314-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24313-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24314-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics