Skip to main content

Privacy vs. Utility: An Enhanced K-coRated

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1406 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11619))

Abstract

In recommender systems, collaborative filtering (CF) techniques are becoming increasingly popular with the evolution of the Internet. Such techniques are based on filtering or evaluating items through the opinions of online consumers. They use patterns learned from their behavior or preferences to make recommendation. In this context, it is of great importance to protect users’ privacy when there is a need to publish data for a specific purpose which conduct to the usefulness of collaborative recommender systems. However, too much protection to individual privacy will lead to the loss of data utility. How to balance between privacy and utility is challenging. In this paper, we propose a privacy-preserving method based on k-means and k-coRating privacy-preserving model. First, we evaluate the k-coRated model by privacy and utility. Then, according to the drawbacks of it, we introduce our solutions to address the problem. Finally, we make a comparison between our model and k-coRated model in different aspects. As a result, our model outperforms k-coRated model with respect to utility as well as privacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Netflix. 2006. Netflix Prize. Retrieved December 17, 2018 from https://www.netflixprize.com/.

  2. 2.

    Netflix Sued for Largest Voluntary Privacy Breach To Date. Retrieved December 17, 2018 from https://privacylaw.proskauer.com/2009/12/articles/invasion-of-privacy/.

References

  1. Narayanan, A., Shmatikov, V.: Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2008, pp. 111–125 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lohr, S.: Netflix cancels contest after concerns are raised about privacy, p. B3. New York Times (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. El Haddad, G., Aïmeur, E., Hage, H.: Understanding trust, privacy and financial fears in online payment. In: 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications/12th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Science and Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE), pp. 28–36 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gai, K., Qiu, M., Xiong, Z., Liu, M.: Privacy-preserving multi-channel communication in edge-of-things. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 85, 190–200 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barth, S., de Jong, M.: The privacy paradox–investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior–a systematic literature review. Telemat. Inform. 34, 1038–1058 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, F., Lee, V.E., Jin, R.: k-CoRating: filling up data to obtain privacy and utility. In: AAAI, pp. 320–328 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ye, Y., Wang, L., Han, J., Qiu, S., Luo, F.: An anonymization method combining anatomy and permutation for protecting privacy in microdata with multiple sensitive attributes. In: 2017 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC), pp. 404–411 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, F., Lee, V.E., Jin, R., Garg, S., Choo, K.-K.R., Maasberg, M., et al.: Privacy-aware smart city: a case study in collaborative filtering recommender systems. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 127, 145–159 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, Q., Liu, H., Wu, Y., Lin, C., Lin, G.: Grey maximum distance to average vector based on quasi identifier attribute. In 2017 International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS), p. 119 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bos, J.W., Castryck, W., Iliashenko, I., Vercauteren, F.: Privacy-friendly forecasting for the smart grid using homomorphic encryption and the group method of data handling. In: International Conference on Cryptology in Africa, pp. 184–201 (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, L., Chen, B., Zeadally, S., He, D.: An efficient and secure searchable public key encryption scheme with privacy protection for cloud storage. Soft Comput. 22, 1–12 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Raisaro, J.L., Choi, G., Pradervand, S., Colsenet, R., Jacquemont, N., Rosat, N., et al.: Protecting privacy and security of genomic data in I2B2 with homomorphic encryption and differential privacy. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 15, 1413–1426 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cappiello, C., Plebani, P., Vitali, M.: A data utility model for data-intensive applications in fog computing environments. In: Mahmood, Z. (ed.) Fog Computing, pp. 183–202. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94890-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Han, J., Yu, J., Lu, J., Peng, H., Wu, J.: An anonymization method to improve data utility for classification. In: International Symposium on Cyberspace Safety and Security, pp. 57–71 (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Brickell, J., Shmatikov, V.: The cost of privacy: destruction of data-mining utility in anonymized data publishing. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 70–78 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, M.P., Zhao, L., Chakraborty, S.: Achieving Pareto-optimal MI-based privacy-utility tradeoffs under full data. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 12, 1093–1105 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, T., Li, N.: On the tradeoff between privacy and utility in data publishing. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 517–526 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rastogi, V., Suciu, D., Hong, S.: The boundary between privacy and utility in data publishing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 531–542 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Batmaz, Z., Kaleli, C.: Methods of privacy preserving in collaborative filtering. In: 2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), pp. 261–266 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sweeney, L.: k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 10, 557–570 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Machanavajjhala, A., Gehrke, J., Kifer, D.: ℓ-density: privacy beyond k-anonymity. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2006), Atlanta, Georgia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, N., Li, T., Venkatasubramanian, S.: t-closeness: privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity. In: IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2007, pp. 106–115 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dwork, C.: Differential privacy: a survey of results. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of Computation, pp. 1–19 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, K.-C., Yu, C.-M., Tai, B.-C., Li, S.-C., Tsou, Y.-T., Huang, Y., et al.: Data-driven approach for evaluating risk of disclosure and utility in differentially private data release. In: 2017 IEEE 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp. 1130–1137 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Keller, J.M., Gray, M.R., Givens, J.A.: A fuzzy k-nearest neighbor algorithm. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 580–585 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghada El-Haddad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xiang, Z., El-Haddad, G., Aïmeur, E. (2019). Privacy vs. Utility: An Enhanced K-coRated. In: Misra, S., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019. ICCSA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11619. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24289-3_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24289-3_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24288-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24289-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics