Skip to main content

Multi-objective Investment Decision Making Based on an Improved SPEA2 Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Security (ICAIS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 11632))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1698 Accesses

Abstract

An improved SPEA2 algorithm is proposed to optimize the multi-objective decision-making of investment. In the improved method, an external archive set is set up separately for local search after genetic operation, which guarantees the global search ability and also has strong local search ability. At the same time, the new crossover operator and individual update strategy are used to further improve the convergence ability of the algorithm while maintaining a strong diversity of the population. The experimental results show that the improved method can converge to the Pareto optimal boundary and improve the convergence speed, which can effectively realize the multi-objective decision making of investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ye, S., Tiong, R.L.K.: NPV-at-risk method in infrastructure project investment evaluation. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 126(3), 227–233 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Byung-cheol, K., Euysup, S., Reinschmidt, K.F.: Probability distribution of the project payback period using the equivalent cash flow decomposition. Eng. Econ. 58(2), 112–136 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Soderbaum, P.: Benefit-cost analysis. A political economy approach. J. Econ. Issues 25(1), 261–263 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asta, S., Karapetyan, D., Kheiri, A., et al.: Combining Monte-Carlo and hyper-heuristic methods for the multi-mode resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem. Inf. Sci. 373, 476–498 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia, Y., Liu, C., Li, Y.Y., et al.: A boosted decision tree approach using Bayesian hyper-parameter optimization for credit scoring. Exp. Syst. Appl. 78, 225–241 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Furini, F., Ljubic, I., Sinnl, M.: An effective dynamic programming algorithm for the minimum-cost maximal knapsack packing problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262, 438–448 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, M., Taffler, R.: The incremental effect of narrative accounting information in corporate annual reports. J. Bus. Finance Account. 22(8), 1195–1210 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, S., Yang, X., Zhong, W., Sun, Y.: A highly effective DPA attack method based on genetic algorithm. Comput. Mater. Continua 56(2), 325–338 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peng, X., Wang, W.: Optimal investment and risk control for an insurer under inside information. Insur. Math. Econ. 69, 104–116 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadeghi, J., Sadeghi, S., Niaki, S.T.A.: A hybrid vendor managed inventory and redundancy allocation optimization problem in supply chain management: An NSGA-II with tuned parameters. Comput. Oper. Res. 41(1), 53–64 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Salgueiro, Y., Toro, J.L., Bello, R., et al.: Multiobjective variable mesh optimization. Ann. Oper. Res. 258(2), 1–25 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Knowles, J.D., Corne, D.W.: Approximating the nondominated front using the pareto archived evolution strategy. Evol. Comput. 8(2), 149–172 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lejeune, M.A., Shen, S.: Multi-objective probabilistically constrained programs with variable risk: Models for multi-portfolio financial optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 252(2), 522–539 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhuvana, J., Aravindan, C.: Memetic algorithm with preferential local search using adaptive weights for multi-objective optimization problems. Soft Comput. 20(4), 1365–1388 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, C., Zapevalova, E., Chen, Y., Li, F.: Time optimization of multiple knowledge transfers in the big data environment. Comput. Mater. Continua 54(3), 269–285 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michalewicz, Z., Deb, K., Schmidt, M., et al.: Test-case generator for nonlinear continuous parameter optimization techniques. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 4(3), 197–215 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Henri, J.F., Boiral, O., Roy, M.J.: Strategic cost management and performance: The case of environmental costs. Br. Account. Rev. 48(2), 269–282 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xi Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, X., Zhang, D. (2019). Multi-objective Investment Decision Making Based on an Improved SPEA2 Algorithm. In: Sun, X., Pan, Z., Bertino, E. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Security. ICAIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11632. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24274-9_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24274-9_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24273-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24274-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics