Skip to main content

Carving Out Qualifications: Mastering Ph.D. Problems in Post-graduate Gender & Sexuality Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uplifting Gender and Sexuality Education Research

Abstract

This book chapter considers the difficulties of studying gender and sexualities to gain qualifications. It recalls eight individuals’ current and past experiences as higher degree research (HDR) students—including honours, Masters and Ph.D. candidates and other academics. It first reviews the literature on working in this area and second provides a series of individuals’ most difficult experiences of being an HDR in gender and sexuality (G&S) research, and how they creatively overcame key obstacles. The chapter concludes by drawing together key learning from the literature and the HDR learning experiences, which can be applied when studying gender and sexuality topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Breslin C. Human Rights Campaign Foundation Names MetLife a ‘Best Place to Work’; Nation’s #1 Life Insurer Recognized for Giving Choices to Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Job Seekers Business Wire, [Internet]. 2006: (p. 1). Available from: http://search.proquest.com.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/docview/445290530?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo. 30 January 2006.

  2. Lyons H, Brenner B, Fassinger R. A multicultural test of the theory of work adjustment: Investigating the role of heterosexism and fit perceptions in the job satisfaction of lesbian, gay, and bisexual employees. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2005;52(4): 537–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chung YB. Work discrimination and coping strategies: Conceptual frameworks for counseling lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Career Development Quarterly. 2001;50(1): 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Croteau JM, Anderson MZ, DiStefano TM, Kampa-Kokesch S. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual vocational psychology: Reviewing foundations and planning construction. In: Perez R, Debord K, Bieschke K, editors. Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2000. pp. 383–408.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Levine M, Leonard R. Discrimination against lesbians in the work force. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 1984;9(1): 700–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zurlinden J. Lesbian and gay nurses. Albany: Delmar Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernstein M, Swartwout P. Gay officers in their midst: Heterosexual police employees’ anticipation of the consequences for coworkers who come out. Journal of Homosexuality. 2012;59(8): 1145–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rudoe N. Lesbian teachers’ identity, power and the public/private boundary. Sex Education. 2010;10(1): 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. International Labour Organisation. Discrimination at work on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity: Results of the ILO’s PRIDE project. Geneva: The Gender, Equality and Diversity Branch of the International Labour Office; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guasp A, Balfour J. Peak performance: Gay people and productivity. London: Stonewall, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miles N. The double-glazed glass ceiling: Lesbians in the workplace. London: Stonewall, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Drydakis N. Sexual orientation and labour market outcomes. Bonn Germany: IZA World of Labor’; 2014 (1 February 2016). Report No.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Douglas J. Gay pride and prejudice in the Pacific. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work. 2015;25(3): 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ozturk M. Sexual orientation discrimination: Exploring the experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual employees in Turkey. Human Relations. 2011;64(8): 1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chirgwin SK. Burdens too difficult to carry? A case study of three academically able Indigenous Australian Masters students who had to withdraw. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2014;1(1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eades Q. All the beginnings: A queer autobiography of the body. Victoria: Tantanoola; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kafer A. Feminist, crip, queer. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hekman S. Identity crises: Identity, identity politics, and beyond. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 1999;2(1): 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lather P. Feminist research in education: Within/ against. Geelong: Deaking University Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones T. Understanding education policy: The ‘four education orientations’ framework. Dordrecht Netherlands: Springer; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hemer S. Informality, Power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: Supervising PhD candidates over coffee. Higher Education Research and Development. 2012;31(6): 827–39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yonezawa S, Jones M. Student co-researchers: How principals can recruit, train, and enlist the help of students to examine what works and does not work in their schools. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin. 2007; 91(4): 322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. United Nations. Born free and equal: Sexual orientation and gender identity in international human rights law. New York and Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sabia J, Wooden M. Sexual identity, earnings, and labour market dynamics: New evidence from longitudinal data in Australia. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne; and Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA); 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sex Discrimination Amendment (Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Intersex Status) Act 2013 (Cth) (SDA Amendment Act) (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Toscano N. Workplace homophobia keeps gays and lesbians in the closet. The Age, [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/workplace-homophobia-keeps-gays-and-lesbians-in-the-closet-20150220-13kdl2.html#ixzz4AO9ApK2s. 20 February 2016.

  27. Jara M. Gay and lesbian rights; Forcing change in South Africa. Southern Africa Report. 1998;13(3): 31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Everett C. South Africa Progressive on LGBT Rights But Gays Still Battle for Social Reform. International Business Times, [Internet]. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tesfaye S. Rand Paul’s disgraceful solution to LGBT workplace discrimination: Stay in the closet. Salon, [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.salon.com/2015/10/15/rand_pauls_disgraceful_solution_to_lgbt_workplace_discrimination_stay_in_the_closet/. 16 August 2015.

  30. Renzulli K-A. The best way to come out to coworkers and bosses. Money, [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://time.com/money/3491565/tim-cook-apple-gay-come-out-work/. 30 August 2014.

  31. Williamson A, Woods J, Conley J, O’ Barr W, Losey M, Colbert C, et al. Is this the right time to come out? Harvard Business Review. 1993;71(4): 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mudiwa L. Bill to boost equality for gay practitioners. Irish Medical Times. 2012;46(10): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The Economist Editorial. Fifty shades of pink; Gay rights in South-East Asia. The Economist. 2013;408(1): 8843.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Colby L. Protecting gay employees where being gay is a crime. Bloomberg, [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-17/protecting-gay-employees-where-being-gay-is-a-crime. 17 May 2016.

  35. Rahn A, Jones T, Bennett C, Lykins A. Conflicting agendas: The politics of sex in aged care. Elder Law Review. 2017;10(1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lee RM. Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rahn A, Lykins A, Bennett C, Jones T. Opening a Can of Worms: Consenting Adults in Aged Care. Bringing Research to Life: 14th National Conference of Emerging Researchers in Ageing Program & Proceedings. Melbourne: National Ageing Research Institute; 2015. pp. 56–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S, Liamputtong P. Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research. 2007;7(3): 327–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bare MG, Margolies L, Boehmer U. Omission of sexual and gender minority patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32(20): 2182–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bergoglio M, Gomez-Balaguer M, Folch E, Murillo F, Hernandez-Mijares A. Symptomatic meningioma induced by cross-sex hormone treatment in a male-to-female transsexual. Endocrinologia y Nutricion. 2013;50(5): 264–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Alhabshi SMI, Ismail Z, Arasaratnam SA. Primary non-hodgkin B cell lymphoma in a man. Iranian Journal of Radiology. 2011;8(1): 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kerr L, Jones T. Cancer screening for trans and gender diverse people. In: Jones T, editor. Melbourne: Clouds of Magellan; 2017. pp. 125–35.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Davis K. Southern comfort. USA: HBO Documentary; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ferfolja T, Ullman J. Gender and sexuality in education and health: Voices advocating for equity and social justice. Sex Education. 2017;17(3): 235–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shannon B, Smith S. Dogma before diversity: The contradictory rhetoric of controversy and diversity in the politicisation of Australian queer-affirming learning materials. Sex Education. 2017;17(3): 242–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Topp S. Against the quiet revolution: The rhetorical construction of intersex individuals as disordered. Sexualities. 2013;16(1–2): 180–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Agius S. Human rights and intersex people. Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jones T. Intersex and family: Supporting family members with intersex variations. Journal of Family Strengths. 2017;17(2): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Henningham M, Jones T. Cut it out: Rethinking surgical intervention on intersex infants. In: Jones T, editor. Melbourne: Clouds of Magellan; 2017. pp. 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Davis G. Contesting intersex: The dubious diagnosis. New York: New York University Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jones T, Hart B, Carpenter M, Ansara G, Leonard W, Lucke J. Intersex: Stories and statistics from Australia. London: Open Book Publisher; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jones T. The needs of students with intersex variations. Sex Education, (Internet). 2016; 16(6):602–18. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14681811.2016.1149808?journalCode=csed20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. del Pozo de Bolger A, Jones T, Dunstan D, Lykins A. Australian trans men: Development, sexuality, and mental health. Australian Psychologist. 2014;49(6): 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Jones T, del Pozo de Bolger A, Dunne T, Lykins A, Hawkes G. Female-to-Male (FtM) transgender people’s experiences in Australia. Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, and London: Springer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bishop R. Freeing ourselves. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jones T, Takayama K, Posthausen G, Carter K, Landrigan B, Bennell D, et al. Improving services to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students: A critical study. New York: NOVA Science; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Smyth J, McInerney P. Whose side are you on? Advocacy ethnography: Some methodological aspects of narrative portraits of disadvantaged young people, in socially critical research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2013;26(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2011.604649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pedroni T. Market movements: African American involvement in school voucher reform. New York: Routledge; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Petersen EB. What crisis of representation? Challenging the realism of post-structuralist policy research in education. Critical Studies in Education. 2015;56(1): 147–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.983940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Pillow W. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2003;16(2): 175–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kincheloe JL, Steinberg SR. Indigenous knowledges in education: Complexities, dangers, and profound benefits. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, Smith LT, editors. Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage; 2008. pp. 123–56.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Eribon D. Returning to reims. California: Semiotext(e); 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Clare E. Exile and pride: Disability, queerness, and liberation. Cambridge: South End Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tea M, editor. Without a net: The female experience of growing up working class. California: Seal Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bérubé A. Intellectual desire. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies. 1993;3(1): 139–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiffany Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jones, T. et al. (2019). Carving Out Qualifications: Mastering Ph.D. Problems in Post-graduate Gender & Sexuality Study. In: Jones, T., Coll, L., van Leent, L., Taylor, Y. (eds) Uplifting Gender and Sexuality Education Research. Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24205-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24205-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24204-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24205-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics