Abstract
For purposes of comparison with observations at high photon energies, I have computed the Compton-synchrotron spectrum of the Crab on the assumption that there exists therein production of a synchrotron spectrum extending from the radio to the optical to the x-ray region.
For purposes of comparison with observations at high photon energies, I have computed the Compton-synchrotron spectrum of the Crab on the assumption that there exists therein production of a synchrotron spectrum extending from the radio to the optical to the x-ray region.
Robert J. Gould, 1965
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As described in the bachelor thesis of Joel Betorz in 2015 at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (uab) under the supervision of Dr. Markus Gaug.
- 2.
For the naming convention see Sect. 5.1.
- 3.
We estimate the psf by analyzing Crab nebula data taken under similar conditions to our data. For this estimation we ignore the fact, that the tails of magic’s psf can be slightly better reproduced by the King function or a double Gaussian, see for example [4].
References
Ahnen M et al (2017a) Performance of the MAGIC telescopes under moonlight. Astropart Phys 94:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.08.001
Aleksić J et al (2015b) The major upgrade of the MAGIC telescopes, part I: the hardware improvements and the commissioning of the system. Astropart Phys, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.04.004
Zanin R et al (2013) MARS, the MAGIC analysis and reconstruction software. In: 33rd international cosmic ray conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, p 773
Nievas-Rosillo M, Contreras JL (2016) Extending the Li&Ma method to include PSF information. Astropart Phys 74:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.10.001
Prandini E et al (2015) Study of hadron and gamma-ray acceptance of the MAGIC telescopes: towards an improved background estimation. In: 34th international cosmic ray conference, The Hague, Netherlands
Ahnen M et al (2018) Indirect dark matter searches in the dwarf satellite galaxy Ursa Major II with the MAGIC telescopes. J Cosmol Astropart Phys 2018(03):009–009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/009
Abdalla H et al (2018b) The population of TeV pulsar wind nebulae in the H.E.S.S. galactic plane survey. Astron Astrophys, 612:A2. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629377
Li TP, Ma YQ (1983) Analysis methods for results in gamma-ray astronomy. Astrophys J 272:317–324
Abdalla H et al (2018a) The H.E.S.S. galactic plane survey. Astron Astrophys 612:A1. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732098
Rolke WA et al (2005) Limits and confidence intervals in the presence of nuisance parameters. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 551(2–3):493–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2005.05.068
Abeysekara AU et al (2017) The 2HWC HAWC observatory gamma-ray catalog. Astrophys J 843(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7556
magic Collaboration et al (2018) MAGIC observations on Pulsar Wind Nebulae around high spin-down power Fermi-LAT pulsars. In: preparation
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carreto Fidalgo, D. (2019). MAGIC Observations of PSR J0631: Analysis and Results. In: Revealing the Most Energetic Light from Pulsars and Their Nebulae. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24194-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24194-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24193-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24194-0
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)