Skip to main content

Fertility and Pregnancy Counseling of Breast Cancer Patients with Germline BRCA Mutations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fertility Challenges and Solutions in Women with Cancer

Abstract

Irrespective of their family history, approximately 12% of breast cancer cases diagnosed in women under the age of 40 are hereditary tumors secondary to the presence of germline deleterious mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 or BRCA2. The indication to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy at a young age for women carrying a mutation in the BRCA genes has a direct negative impact on patients’ fertility and family planning. In addition, preclinical and limited clinical evidence suggests a possible negative effect of a BRCA mutation on female ovarian reserve and fertility. Based on both the unique features and needs of these patients as well as the limited evidence on the performance of fertility preservation strategies and on the safety of having a pregnancy following the end of anticancer treatments, oncofertility counseling is particularly complex in young women with newly diagnosed BRCA-mutated breast cancer. This chapter aims to review the available evidence on the impact of carrying a germline deleterious BRCA mutation on the reproductive potential of these women as well as to discuss how to optimally manage the oncofertility counseling of young BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients facing fertility and pregnancy-related issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Gelber S, Schapira L, Come S, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing in young women with breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(6):730–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Copson ER, Maishman TC, Tapper WJ, Cutress RI, Greville-Heygate S, Altman DG, et al. Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(2):169–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, Phillips K-A, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom M-J, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017;317(23):2402–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Sessa C, Balmana J, Cardoso MJ, Gilbert F, et al. Prevention and screening in BRCA mutation carriers and other breast/ovarian hereditary cancer syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for cancer prevention and screening. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v103–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paluch-Shimon S, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Abulkhair O, Cardoso M-J, Dent RA, et al. ESO-ESMO 3rd international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY3). Breast. 2017;35:203–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Samimi G, Bernardini MQ, Brody LC, Caga-Anan CF, Campbell IG, Chenevix-Trench G, et al. Traceback: a proposed framework to increase identification and genetic counseling of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers through family-based outreach. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(20):2329–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lambertini M, Goldrat O, Toss A, Azim HA, Peccatori FA, Ignatiadis M, et al. Fertility and pregnancy issues in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;59:61–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de la Noval BD. Potential implications on female fertility and reproductive lifespan in BRCA germline mutation women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(5):1099–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giscard d’Estaing S, Perrin D, Lenoir GM, Guérin JF, Dante R. Upregulation of the BRCA1 gene in human germ cells and in preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(3):785–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eakin CM, Maccoss MJ, Finney GL, Klevit RE. Estrogen receptor alpha is a putative substrate for the BRCA1 ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(14):5794–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Titus S, Li F, Stobezki R, Akula K, Unsal E, Jeong K, et al. Impairment of BRCA1-related DNA double-strand break repair leads to ovarian aging in mice and humans. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(172):172ra21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharan SK, Pyle A, Coppola V, Babus J, Swaminathan S, Benedict J, et al. BRCA2 deficiency in mice leads to meiotic impairment and infertility. Development. 2004;131(1):131–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinberg-Shukron A, Rachmiel M, Renbaum P, Gulsuner S, Walsh T, Lobel O, et al. Essential role of BRCA2 in ovarian development and function. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(11):1042–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Govindaraj V, Keralapura Basavaraju R, Rao AJ. Changes in the expression of DNA double strand break repair genes in primordial follicles from immature and aged rats. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30(3):303–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang D, Zhang X, Zeng M, Yuan J, Liu M, Yin Y, et al. Increased DNA damage and repair deficiency in granulosa cells are associated with ovarian aging in rhesus monkey. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(7):1069–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Govindaraj V, Krishnagiri H, Chauhan MS, Rao AJ. BRCA-1 gene expression and comparative proteomic profile of primordial follicles from young and adult buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) ovaries. Anim Biotechnol. 2017;28(2):94–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin W, Titus S, Moy F, Ginsburg ES, Oktay K. Ovarian aging in women with BRCA germline mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(10):3839–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Giordano S, Garrett-Mayer E, Mittal N, Smith K, Shulman L, Passaglia C, et al. Association of BRCA1 mutations with impaired ovarian reserve: connection between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risk. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2016;5(4):337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Derks-Smeets IAP, van Tilborg TC, van Montfoort A, Smits L, Torrance HL, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, et al. BRCA1 mutation carriers have a lower number of mature oocytes after ovarian stimulation for IVF/PGD. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(11):1475–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gunnala V, Fields J, Irani M, D’Angelo D, Xu K, Schattman G, et al. BRCA carriers have similar reproductive potential at baseline to noncarriers: comparisons in cancer and cancer-free cohorts undergoing fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(2):363–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stolk L, Perry JRB, Chasman DI, He C, Mangino M, Sulem P, et al. Meta-analyses identify 13 loci associated with age at menopause and highlight DNA repair and immune pathways. Nat Genet. 2012;44(3):260–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Day FR, Ruth KS, Thompson DJ, Lunetta KL, Pervjakova N, Chasman DI, et al. Large-scale genomic analyses link reproductive aging to hypothalamic signaling, breast cancer susceptibility and BRCA1-mediated DNA repair. Nat Genet. 2015;47(11):1294–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rzepka-Górska I, Tarnowski B, Chudecka-Głaz A, Górski B, Zielińska D, Tołoczko-Grabarek A. Premature menopause in patients with BRCA1 gene mutation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;100(1):59–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lambertini M, Goldrat O, Ferreira AR, Dechene J, Azim HA, Desir J, et al. Reproductive potential and performance of fertility preservation strategies in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(1):237–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lambertini M, Olympios N, Lequesne J, Calbrix C, Fontanilles M, Loeb A, Leheurteur M, Demeestere I, Di Fiore F, Perdrix A, Clatot F. Impact of taxanes, endocrine therapy and deleterious germline BRCA mutations on anti-müllerian hormone levels in early breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline- and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Front Oncol. 2019;9:575. [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00575.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Paluch-Shimon S, Peccatori FA. BRCA 1 and 2 mutation status: the elephant in the room during oncofertility counseling for young breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(1):26–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Valentini A, Finch A, Lubiński J, Byrski T, Ghadirian P, Kim-Sing C, et al. Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in patients with breast cancer with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3914–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Partridge AH, Ruddy KJ, Gelber S, Schapira L, Abusief M, Meyer M, et al. Ovarian reserve in women who remain premenopausal after chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):638–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(3):e9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Poggio F, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Pondé NF, La Valle G, Del Mastro L, et al. Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(7):1497–508.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Poggio F, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Conte B, Martel S, Maurer C, et al. Single-agent PARP inhibitors for the treatment of patients with BRCA-mutated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ESMO Open. 2018;3(4):e000361.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1214–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peccatori FA, Azim HA, Orecchia R, Hoekstra HJ, Pavlidis N, Kesic V, et al. Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(Suppl 6):vi160–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, Quinn GP, Reinecke J, Taylor HS, et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(19):1994–2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shapira M, Raanani H, Feldman B, Srebnik N, Dereck-Haim S, Manela D, et al. BRCA mutation carriers show normal ovarian response in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(5):1162–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Turan V, Bedoschi G, Emirdar V, Moy F, Oktay K. Ovarian stimulation in patients with cancer: impact of letrozole and BRCA mutations on fertility preservation cycle outcomes. Reprod Sci. 2018;25(1):26–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shapira M, Raanani H, Meirow D. IVF for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients—efficacy and safety issues. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(8):1171–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim J, Turan V, Oktay K. Long-term safety of letrozole and gonadotropin stimulation for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(4):1364–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lambertini M, Del Mastro L, Pescio MC, Andersen CY, Azim HA, Peccatori FA, et al. Cancer and fertility preservation: international recommendations from an expert meeting. BMC Med. 2016;14:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jensen AK, Macklon KT, Fedder J, Ernst E, Humaidan P, Andersen CY. 86 successful births and 9 ongoing pregnancies worldwide in women transplanted with frozen-thawed ovarian tissue: focus on birth and perinatal outcome in 40 of these children. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(3):325–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tanbo T, Greggains G, Storeng R, Busund B, Langebrekke A, Fedorcsak P. Autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue after treatment for malignant disease: the first Norwegian results. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(9):937–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Telfer EE, McLaughlin M. In vitro development of ovarian follicles. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29(1):15–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. McLaughlin M, Albertini DF, Wallace WHB, Anderson RA, Telfer EE. Metaphase II oocytes from human unilaminar follicles grown in a multi-step culture system. Mol Hum Reprod. 2018;24(3):135–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lambertini M, Cinquini M, Moschetti I, Peccatori FA, Anserini P, Valenzano Menada M, et al. Temporary ovarian suppression during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function and fertility in breast cancer patients: A GRADE approach for evidence evaluation and recommendations by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology. Eur J Cancer. 2017;71:25–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lambertini M, Boni L, Michelotti A, Gamucci T, Scotto T, Gori S, et al. Ovarian suppression with triptorelin during adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy and long-term ovarian function, pregnancies, and disease-free survival: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(24):2632–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Leonard RCF, Adamson DJA, Bertelli G, Mansi J, Yellowlees A, Dunlop J, et al. GnRH agonist for protection against ovarian toxicity during chemotherapy for early breast cancer: the Anglo Celtic Group OPTION trial. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):1811–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moore HCF, Unger JM, Phillips K-A, Boyle F, Hitre E, Moseley A, et al. Final analysis of the prevention of early menopause study (POEMS)/SWOG intergroup S0230. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(2):210–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lambertini M, Ceppi M, Poggio F, Peccatori FA, Azim HA, Ugolini D, et al. Ovarian suppression using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function and fertility of breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized studies. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(12):2408–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bai F, Lu Y, Wu K, Chen Q, Ding L, Ge M, et al. Protecting effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage in premenopausal breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Care (Basel). 2017;12(1):48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lambertini M, Moore HCF, Leonard RCF, Loibl S, Munster P, Bruzzone M, et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy for preservation of ovarian function and fertility in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient–level data. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(19):1981–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Wong M, O’Neill S, Walsh G, Smith IE. Goserelin with chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function in pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer: menstruation and pregnancy outcomes. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(1):133–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Biglia N, Torrisi R, D’Alonzo M, Codacci Pisanelli G, Rota S, Peccatori FA. Attitudes on fertility issues in breast cancer patients: an Italian survey. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(6):458–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lambertini M, Di Maio M, Pagani O, Curigliano G, Poggio F, Del Mastro L, et al. The BCY3/BCC 2017 survey on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practice towards fertility and pregnancy-related issues in young breast cancer patients. Breast. 2018;42:41–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lambertini M, Di Maio M, Poggio F, Pagani O, Curigliano G, Del Mastro L, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of physicians towards fertility and pregnancy-related issues in young BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(5):835–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lambertini M, Martel S, Campbell C, Guillaume S, Hilbers FS, Schuehly U, et al. Pregnancies during and after trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive early breast cancer: analysis from the NeoALTTO (BIG 1-06) and ALTTO (BIG 2-06) trials. Cancer. 2019;125(2):307–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lambertini M, Kroman N, Ameye L, Cordoba O, Pinto A, Benedetti G, et al. Long-term safety of pregnancy following breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(4):426–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hartman EK, Eslick GD. The prognosis of women diagnosed with breast cancer before, during and after pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;160(2):347–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Valentini A, Lubinski J, Byrski T, Ghadirian P, Moller P, Lynch HT, et al. The impact of pregnancy on breast cancer survival in women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142(1):177–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Lambertini M, Ameye L, Hamy AS, Zingarello A, Poorvu PD, Carrasco E, et al. Safety of pregnancy following breast cancer (BC) in patients (pts) carrying a BRCA mutation (mBRCA): results of an international cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:15_suppl:abstract 11506.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pagani O, Ruggeri M, Manunta S, Saunders C, Peccatori F, Cardoso F, et al. Pregnancy after breast cancer: Are young patients willing to participate in clinical studies? Breast. 2015;24(3):201–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Tollin S, Miree CA, Murphy D, Bower B, et al. BRCA carriers’ thoughts on risk management in relation to preimplantation genetic diagnosis and childbearing: when too many choices are just as difficult as none. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2473–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Derks-Smeets IAP, Gietel-Habets JJG, Tibben A, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Geraedts JPM, et al. Decision-making on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(5):1103–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ormondroyd E, Donnelly L, Moynihan C, Savona C, Bancroft E, Evans DG, et al. Attitudes to reproductive genetic testing in women who had a positive BRCA test before having children: a qualitative analysis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(1):4–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Gietel-Habets JJG, de Die-Smulders CEM, Derks-Smeets IAP, Tibben A, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Golde R, et al. Awareness and attitude regarding reproductive options of persons carrying a BRCA mutation and their partners. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(3):588–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Derks-Smeets IAP, de Die-Smulders CEM, Mackens S, van Golde R, Paulussen AD, Dreesen J, et al. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and reproduction: an observational study on the suitability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for both asymptomatic carriers and breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;145(3):673–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sagi M, Weinberg N, Eilat A, Aizenman E, Werner M, Girsh E, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for BRCA1/2—a novel clinical experience. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(5):508–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Shenfield F, Pennings G, Devroey P, Sureau C, Tarlatzis B, Cohen J, et al. Taskforce 5: preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(3):649–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Menon U, Harper J, Sharma A, Fraser L, Burnell M, ElMasry K, et al. Views of BRCA gene mutation carriers on preimplantation genetic diagnosis as a reproductive option for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1573–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Rubin LR, Werner-Lin A, Sagi M, Cholst I, Stern R, Lilienthal D, et al. “The BRCA clock is ticking!”: negotiating medical concerns and reproductive goals in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2014;17(3):159–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Daum H, Peretz T, Laufer N. BRCA mutations and reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(1):33–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Derks-Smeets IAP, Schrijver LH, de Die-Smulders CEM, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Golde RJT, Smits LJ, et al. Ovarian stimulation for IVF and risk of primary breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2018;01:357–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Luke B, Brown MB, Missmer SA, Spector LG, Leach RE, Williams M, et al. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(1):183–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Rosen A. Third-party reproduction and adoption in cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;2005(34):91–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Margherita Condorelli acknowledges the support from FNRS-Télévie for the conduction of her PhD at the Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, CUB-Hôpital Erasme in Brussels (Belgium). Matteo Lambertini acknowledges the support from the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) for a Translational Research Fellowship at the Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels (Belgium) during the writing of this book chapter.

Funding: This work did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosure: Margherita Condorelli declares no conflicts of interest. Matteo Lambertini served as a consultant for Teva and received speaker honoraria from Theramex and Takeda outside the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Lambertini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Condorelli, M., Lambertini, M. (2020). Fertility and Pregnancy Counseling of Breast Cancer Patients with Germline BRCA Mutations. In: Azim Jr, H., Demeestere, I., Peccatori, F. (eds) Fertility Challenges and Solutions in Women with Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24086-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24086-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24085-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24086-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics