Skip to main content

Case Studies on Remediation of Sites Contaminated with Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Abstract

Contamination can be defined as the abnormal presence of pollutants that adversely or negatively impacts an object. “Environmental remediation” is a very broad term used to define any effort employed to solve the problems caused by contaminants that affect either soils or waters in or on the ground surface. Protection of human health and the environment is the important objective of any remediation approach concerning soil, water, or sediment. The chief objective of the remediation, however, is to remove or reduce concentrations of the contaminants to the “safe” levels for the environment and human health. Though it seems simple with the correct advice and guidance, selection of the best method(s) to remediate polluted site is challenging. Thus, remediation of the areas contaminated with pollutants represents a growing challenge, and cleaning of such areas is of international concern. In this direction, the present chapter has been designed to present the details of several case studies from different countries which dealt with full-scale applications of different technologies to remediate the sites contaminated with total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs). This information could be very useful in providing more insights into various issues such as practical difficulties in the application of the remedial technologies at larger scale as to how clean-up goals are designed, what are the characteristics of contaminated sites (e.g., soil, water, etc.), what are the treatment options, how the levels of contaminants will be changed before and after the treatment in a stipulated time frame, what about the cost factors and economic feasibilities, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdullahi MS (2015) Soil contamination, remediation and plants: prospects and challenges. In: Soil remediation and plants – prospects and challenges, pp 525–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799937-1.00018-8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal A, Liu Y (2015) Remediation technologies for oil-contaminated sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 101:483–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Cohen L, Speitel GE Jr (2001) Kinetics of aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated solvents. Biodegradation 12:105–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carcamo A, Powers J (2000) Bioremediation: case studies in Central Alberta. https://www.scribd.com/document/247203848/Bioremediation-Case-Studies-in-Central-Alberta. Accessed 31st Mar 2019

  • Cheng Z, Yan D, Yupeng F, Yuzhong L, Yong D (2019) Thermal desorption for remediation of contaminated soil: a review. Chemosphere 221:841–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheremisinoff NP (eds) (1998) Pump-and-treat remediation technology. In: Groundwater remediation and treatment technologies. William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, pp 203–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Chibwe L, Geier MC, Makamura J, Tanguay RL, Aitken MD, Simonich SL (2015) Aerobic bioremediation of PAH contaminated soil results in increased genotoxicity and development toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 49:13889–13898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen TH, Manfredi S, Knox K (2010) Landfilling: reactor landfills. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JF, Smith PG (1994) Landfill technology, 1st edn. Butterworth-Heinemann Publishing Company, Oxford, UK, pp 1–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Damera R, Bhandari A (2007) Physical treatment technologies. In: Bhandari A, Surampalli RY, Champagne P, Ong SK, Tyagi RD, Lo IMC (eds) Remediation technologies for soils and groundwater. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 47–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont RR, Doucette WJ, Hinchee RE (1991) Assessment of in situ bioremediation potential and the application of bioventing at a fuel-contaminated site. In: Hinchee RE, Olfenbuttel RF (eds) In situ bioreclamation – applications and investigations for hydrocarbon and contaminated site remediation. Butterworth-Heinemann Publishing Company, Oxford, UK, pp 262–282

    Google Scholar 

  • EthicalChem (2014) Remediation Case Studies. https://www.ethicalchem.com/remediation-case-studies. Accessed Feb 2019

  • FLSS (2019) French Ltd Superfund Site, Crosby, TX background. https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0602498. Accessed 2nd Apr 2019

  • Frascari D, Zanaroli G, Danko AS (2015) In situ aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated solvents: a review. J Hazard Mater 283:382–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frutos FJG, Escolano O, García S, Babín B, Fernández MD (2010) Bioventing remediation and ecotoxicity evaluation of phenanthrene-contaminated soil. J Hazaard Mater 183:806–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FTIR (1991) The Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable. Remediation technologies screening matrix and reference guide, Version 40 Technology – soil, sediment, bedrock and sludge: in situ biological treatment – bioventing. https://frtrgov/matrix2/section4/4_1html. Accessed Mar 2019

  • Go’mez-Garzo’n C, Herna’ndez-Santana A, Dussa’n J (2017) A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Lysinibacillus sphaericus unveils unexploited biotechnological potentials. PLoS One 12:e0179666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Santana A, Dussán J (2018) Lysinibacillus sphaericus proved to have potential for the remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Soil Sed Contam 27:538–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutzler NJ, Murphy BE, Gierke JS (1990) State of technology review: soil vapor extraction systems. EPA/600/S2-89/024, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • I-Chun C, Yu-Yu C, Hwong-wen M (2019) Uncertainty analysis of remediation cost and damaged land value for brownfield investment. Chemosphere 220:371–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDR (2010) International Dredging Review – VeruTEK demonstrates gree surfactant. https://www.dredgemag.com/2010/05/24/verutek-demonstrates-green-surfactant/. Accessed 2nd May 2019

  • Kester (2014) Creosote (Coal Tar Creosote and Wood Creosote). In: Wexler P (ed) Encyclopedia of toxicology, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1055–1060

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khan FI, Husain T, Hejazi R (2004) An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies. J Environ Manage 71:95–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenigsberg SS, Sandefur CA (2008) The use of oxygen release compound for the accelerated bioremediation of aerobically degradable contaminants: the advent of time-release electron acceptors. Remediation 10:3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Mondal AN, Gaikwad SA, Devotta S, Singh RN (2004) Qualitative assessment of methane emission inventory from municipal solid waste disposal sites: a case study. Atmos Environ 38:4921–4929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppusamy S, Palanisami T, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R (2016a) In situ remediation approaches for the management of contaminated sites: a comprehensive overview. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 236:1–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppusamy S, Palanisami T, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R (2016b) Ex situ remediation technologies for environmental pollutants: a critical perspective. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 236:117–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leethem JT (2002) In situ chemical oxidation of MtBE: a successful case study of remediation of a large gasoline resease. Soil Sed Contam 11:450–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombi E, Hamon RE (2005) Remediation of polluted soils. In: Hillel D (ed) Encyclopedia of soils in the environment. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 379–385

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Manchola L, Dussán J (2014) Lysinibacillus sphaericus and Geobacillus sp biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons and biosurfactant production. Remediation 25:85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWatters RS, Rutter A, Rowe RK (2016) Geomembrane applications for controlling diffusive migration of petroleum hydrocarbons in cold region environments. J Environ Manag 181:80–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MEP (2007) Ministry of Environment Protection, China. Identification standards for hazardous wastes, China Environmental Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Nefso EK, Burns SE (2007) Comparison of the equilibrium sorption of five organic compounds to HDPE, PP, and PVC geomembranes. Geotext Geomembr 25:360–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulou M, Kalogeraki N (2016) Ex situ bioremediation treatment (Landfarming). In: McGenity T, Timmis K, Nogales B (eds) Hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology protocols, Springer protocols handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 195–220

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes R (1994) Unit operations in environmental engineering. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge

    Google Scholar 

  • OILZAPPER (2017) Oilzapper (bioremediation) technology – Bioremediation of oil spill in Gujarat oil field in India (Western India). http://www.otbl.co.in/Bioremediation.php. Accessed 18th Apr 2019

  • Oostrom M, Rockhold ML, Thorne PD, Truex MJ, Last GV, Rohay VJ (2007) Carbon tetrachloride flow and transport in the subsurface of the 216-Z-9 trench at the Hanford site. Vadose Zone J 6:971–984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paudyn K, Rutter A, Rowe RK, Poland JS (2008) Remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils in the Canadian Arctic by landfarming. Cold Reg Sci Technol 53:102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen TA, Curtis JT (1991) Soil vapor extraction technology. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A, Nahar N, Nawani NN, Jass J, Desale P, Kapadnis BP, Hossain K, Saha AK, Ghosh S, Olsson B, Mandal A (2014) Isolation and characterization of a Lysinibacillus strain B1-CDA showing potential for bioremediation of arsenics from contaminated water. J Environ Sci Health A 49:1349–1360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regenesis (2019) Case studies. https://regenesis.com/eur/case-studies/?fwp_country=europe-gb. Assessed 21st Apr 2019

  • Rivett MO, Petts J, Butler B, Martin I (2002) Remediation of contaminated land and groundwater: experience in England and Wales. J Environ Manag 65:251–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez A, Recillas S, Font X, Casals E, González E, Puntes V (2011) Ecotoxicity of, and remediation with, engineered inorganic nanoparticles in the environment. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30:507–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soilutions (2016) Soil remediation case studies. https://www.soilutions.co.uk/case-studies/. Accessed 11th Apr 2019

  • Stamnes R, Blanchard J (1997) Engineering forum issue paper: soil vapor extraction implementation experiences. EPA 540/F-95/030, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suer P, Andersson-Sköld Y (2011) Biofuel or excavation? – life cycle assessment (LCA) of soil remediation options. Biomass Bioenergy 35:969–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suthersan SS (eds) (1999) Soil vapor extraction. Remediation engineering: design concepts. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 25 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Switzer C, Kosson DS (2007) Soil vapor extraction performance in layered vadose zone materials. Vadose Zone J 6:397–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ThermoFisher (2015) Contaminated site remediation. A sodium persulfate-based in situ chemical oxidant with built-in activation. https://www.thermofisher.com.au/Uploads/file/Environmental-Industrial/Environmental-Monitoring-Safety/Contaminated-Site-Remediation/Persulfox.pdf. Accessed 21st Apr 2019

  • TOXMAP® (2011) Online toxicology maps. United States Data.gov. February 7, 2011. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOXMAP. Accessed 12th April 2019

  • US EPA (1993) Presumptive remedies: site characterization and technology selection for CERCLA sites with volatile organic compounds. In: Soils (Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1995a) Abstracts of remediation case studies. Prepared by Member Agencies of the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents/frtr-abs.pdf. Accessed 1st Apr 2019

  • US EPA (1995b) Cost and performance report: land treatment at the Scott Lumber Company Superfund Site Alton, Missouri. https://clu-in.org/products/costperf/LNDTREAT/Scott.htm. Accessed 9th Apr 2019

  • US EPA (2011) Presumptive remedies: policy and procedures (Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2012a) Nanotechnologies for environmental cleanup. https://clu-in.org/techfocus/default.focus/sec/nanotechnology:_applications_for_environmental_remediation/cat/application/. Accessed 12th Apr 2019

  • US EPA (2012b) A citizen’s guide to soil vapor extraction and air sparging. EPA/542/F-12/018, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Shen Z, Al-Tabbaa A (2018a) No access PC-based and MgO-based binders stabilised/solidified heavy metal-contaminated model soil: strength and heavy metal speciation in early stage. Géotechnique 68:1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YS, Dai JG, Wang L, Tsang DCW, Poon CS (2018b) Influence of lead on stabilization/solidification by ordinary Portland cement magnesium phosphate cement. Chemosphere 190:90–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yinan S, Deyi H, Junli Z, David OC, Guanghe L, Qingbao G, Shupeng L, Peng L (2018) Environmental and socio-economic sustainability appraisal of contaminated land remediation strategies: a case study at a mega-site in China. Sci Tot Environ 610-611:393–401

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuppusamy, S., Maddela, N.R., Megharaj, M., Venkateswarlu, K. (2020). Case Studies on Remediation of Sites Contaminated with Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. In: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24035-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics