Abstract
Contamination can be defined as the abnormal presence of pollutants that adversely or negatively impacts an object. “Environmental remediation” is a very broad term used to define any effort employed to solve the problems caused by contaminants that affect either soils or waters in or on the ground surface. Protection of human health and the environment is the important objective of any remediation approach concerning soil, water, or sediment. The chief objective of the remediation, however, is to remove or reduce concentrations of the contaminants to the “safe” levels for the environment and human health. Though it seems simple with the correct advice and guidance, selection of the best method(s) to remediate polluted site is challenging. Thus, remediation of the areas contaminated with pollutants represents a growing challenge, and cleaning of such areas is of international concern. In this direction, the present chapter has been designed to present the details of several case studies from different countries which dealt with full-scale applications of different technologies to remediate the sites contaminated with total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs). This information could be very useful in providing more insights into various issues such as practical difficulties in the application of the remedial technologies at larger scale as to how clean-up goals are designed, what are the characteristics of contaminated sites (e.g., soil, water, etc.), what are the treatment options, how the levels of contaminants will be changed before and after the treatment in a stipulated time frame, what about the cost factors and economic feasibilities, etc.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdullahi MS (2015) Soil contamination, remediation and plants: prospects and challenges. In: Soil remediation and plants – prospects and challenges, pp 525–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799937-1.00018-8
Agarwal A, Liu Y (2015) Remediation technologies for oil-contaminated sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 101:483–490
Alvarez-Cohen L, Speitel GE Jr (2001) Kinetics of aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated solvents. Biodegradation 12:105–126
Carcamo A, Powers J (2000) Bioremediation: case studies in Central Alberta. https://www.scribd.com/document/247203848/Bioremediation-Case-Studies-in-Central-Alberta. Accessed 31st Mar 2019
Cheng Z, Yan D, Yupeng F, Yuzhong L, Yong D (2019) Thermal desorption for remediation of contaminated soil: a review. Chemosphere 221:841–855
Cheremisinoff NP (eds) (1998) Pump-and-treat remediation technology. In: Groundwater remediation and treatment technologies. William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, pp 203–258
Chibwe L, Geier MC, Makamura J, Tanguay RL, Aitken MD, Simonich SL (2015) Aerobic bioremediation of PAH contaminated soil results in increased genotoxicity and development toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 49:13889–13898
Christensen TH, Manfredi S, Knox K (2010) Landfilling: reactor landfills. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Hoboken
Crawford JF, Smith PG (1994) Landfill technology, 1st edn. Butterworth-Heinemann Publishing Company, Oxford, UK, pp 1–168
Damera R, Bhandari A (2007) Physical treatment technologies. In: Bhandari A, Surampalli RY, Champagne P, Ong SK, Tyagi RD, Lo IMC (eds) Remediation technologies for soils and groundwater. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 47–78
Dupont RR, Doucette WJ, Hinchee RE (1991) Assessment of in situ bioremediation potential and the application of bioventing at a fuel-contaminated site. In: Hinchee RE, Olfenbuttel RF (eds) In situ bioreclamation – applications and investigations for hydrocarbon and contaminated site remediation. Butterworth-Heinemann Publishing Company, Oxford, UK, pp 262–282
EthicalChem (2014) Remediation Case Studies. https://www.ethicalchem.com/remediation-case-studies. Accessed Feb 2019
FLSS (2019) French Ltd Superfund Site, Crosby, TX background. https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0602498. Accessed 2nd Apr 2019
Frascari D, Zanaroli G, Danko AS (2015) In situ aerobic cometabolism of chlorinated solvents: a review. J Hazard Mater 283:382–399
Frutos FJG, Escolano O, García S, Babín B, Fernández MD (2010) Bioventing remediation and ecotoxicity evaluation of phenanthrene-contaminated soil. J Hazaard Mater 183:806–813
FTIR (1991) The Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable. Remediation technologies screening matrix and reference guide, Version 40 Technology – soil, sediment, bedrock and sludge: in situ biological treatment – bioventing. https://frtrgov/matrix2/section4/4_1html. Accessed Mar 2019
Go’mez-Garzo’n C, Herna’ndez-Santana A, Dussa’n J (2017) A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Lysinibacillus sphaericus unveils unexploited biotechnological potentials. PLoS One 12:e0179666
Hernández-Santana A, Dussán J (2018) Lysinibacillus sphaericus proved to have potential for the remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Soil Sed Contam 27:538–549
Hutzler NJ, Murphy BE, Gierke JS (1990) State of technology review: soil vapor extraction systems. EPA/600/S2-89/024, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati
I-Chun C, Yu-Yu C, Hwong-wen M (2019) Uncertainty analysis of remediation cost and damaged land value for brownfield investment. Chemosphere 220:371–380
IDR (2010) International Dredging Review – VeruTEK demonstrates gree surfactant. https://www.dredgemag.com/2010/05/24/verutek-demonstrates-green-surfactant/. Accessed 2nd May 2019
Kester (2014) Creosote (Coal Tar Creosote and Wood Creosote). In: Wexler P (ed) Encyclopedia of toxicology, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1055–1060
Khan FI, Husain T, Hejazi R (2004) An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies. J Environ Manage 71:95–122
Koenigsberg SS, Sandefur CA (2008) The use of oxygen release compound for the accelerated bioremediation of aerobically degradable contaminants: the advent of time-release electron acceptors. Remediation 10:3–29
Kumar S, Mondal AN, Gaikwad SA, Devotta S, Singh RN (2004) Qualitative assessment of methane emission inventory from municipal solid waste disposal sites: a case study. Atmos Environ 38:4921–4929
Kuppusamy S, Palanisami T, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R (2016a) In situ remediation approaches for the management of contaminated sites: a comprehensive overview. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 236:1–115
Kuppusamy S, Palanisami T, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R (2016b) Ex situ remediation technologies for environmental pollutants: a critical perspective. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 236:117–192
Leethem JT (2002) In situ chemical oxidation of MtBE: a successful case study of remediation of a large gasoline resease. Soil Sed Contam 11:450–451
Lombi E, Hamon RE (2005) Remediation of polluted soils. In: Hillel D (ed) Encyclopedia of soils in the environment. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 379–385
Manchola L, Dussán J (2014) Lysinibacillus sphaericus and Geobacillus sp biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons and biosurfactant production. Remediation 25:85–100
McWatters RS, Rutter A, Rowe RK (2016) Geomembrane applications for controlling diffusive migration of petroleum hydrocarbons in cold region environments. J Environ Manag 181:80–94
MEP (2007) Ministry of Environment Protection, China. Identification standards for hazardous wastes, China Environmental Science Press, Beijing
Nefso EK, Burns SE (2007) Comparison of the equilibrium sorption of five organic compounds to HDPE, PP, and PVC geomembranes. Geotext Geomembr 25:360–365
Nikolopoulou M, Kalogeraki N (2016) Ex situ bioremediation treatment (Landfarming). In: McGenity T, Timmis K, Nogales B (eds) Hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology protocols, Springer protocols handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 195–220
Noyes R (1994) Unit operations in environmental engineering. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge
OILZAPPER (2017) Oilzapper (bioremediation) technology – Bioremediation of oil spill in Gujarat oil field in India (Western India). http://www.otbl.co.in/Bioremediation.php. Accessed 18th Apr 2019
Oostrom M, Rockhold ML, Thorne PD, Truex MJ, Last GV, Rohay VJ (2007) Carbon tetrachloride flow and transport in the subsurface of the 216-Z-9 trench at the Hanford site. Vadose Zone J 6:971–984
Paudyn K, Rutter A, Rowe RK, Poland JS (2008) Remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils in the Canadian Arctic by landfarming. Cold Reg Sci Technol 53:102–114
Pedersen TA, Curtis JT (1991) Soil vapor extraction technology. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge
Rahman A, Nahar N, Nawani NN, Jass J, Desale P, Kapadnis BP, Hossain K, Saha AK, Ghosh S, Olsson B, Mandal A (2014) Isolation and characterization of a Lysinibacillus strain B1-CDA showing potential for bioremediation of arsenics from contaminated water. J Environ Sci Health A 49:1349–1360
Regenesis (2019) Case studies. https://regenesis.com/eur/case-studies/?fwp_country=europe-gb. Assessed 21st Apr 2019
Rivett MO, Petts J, Butler B, Martin I (2002) Remediation of contaminated land and groundwater: experience in England and Wales. J Environ Manag 65:251–268
Sánchez A, Recillas S, Font X, Casals E, González E, Puntes V (2011) Ecotoxicity of, and remediation with, engineered inorganic nanoparticles in the environment. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30:507–516
Soilutions (2016) Soil remediation case studies. https://www.soilutions.co.uk/case-studies/. Accessed 11th Apr 2019
Stamnes R, Blanchard J (1997) Engineering forum issue paper: soil vapor extraction implementation experiences. EPA 540/F-95/030, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Suer P, Andersson-Sköld Y (2011) Biofuel or excavation? – life cycle assessment (LCA) of soil remediation options. Biomass Bioenergy 35:969–981
Suthersan SS (eds) (1999) Soil vapor extraction. Remediation engineering: design concepts. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 25 p
Switzer C, Kosson DS (2007) Soil vapor extraction performance in layered vadose zone materials. Vadose Zone J 6:397–405
ThermoFisher (2015) Contaminated site remediation. A sodium persulfate-based in situ chemical oxidant with built-in activation. https://www.thermofisher.com.au/Uploads/file/Environmental-Industrial/Environmental-Monitoring-Safety/Contaminated-Site-Remediation/Persulfox.pdf. Accessed 21st Apr 2019
TOXMAP® (2011) Online toxicology maps. United States Data.gov. February 7, 2011. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOXMAP. Accessed 12th April 2019
US EPA (1993) Presumptive remedies: site characterization and technology selection for CERCLA sites with volatile organic compounds. In: Soils (Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
US EPA (1995a) Abstracts of remediation case studies. Prepared by Member Agencies of the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents/frtr-abs.pdf. Accessed 1st Apr 2019
US EPA (1995b) Cost and performance report: land treatment at the Scott Lumber Company Superfund Site Alton, Missouri. https://clu-in.org/products/costperf/LNDTREAT/Scott.htm. Accessed 9th Apr 2019
US EPA (2011) Presumptive remedies: policy and procedures (Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
US EPA (2012a) Nanotechnologies for environmental cleanup. https://clu-in.org/techfocus/default.focus/sec/nanotechnology:_applications_for_environmental_remediation/cat/application/. Accessed 12th Apr 2019
US EPA (2012b) A citizen’s guide to soil vapor extraction and air sparging. EPA/542/F-12/018, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.
Wang F, Shen Z, Al-Tabbaa A (2018a) No access PC-based and MgO-based binders stabilised/solidified heavy metal-contaminated model soil: strength and heavy metal speciation in early stage. Géotechnique 68:1025–1030
Wang YS, Dai JG, Wang L, Tsang DCW, Poon CS (2018b) Influence of lead on stabilization/solidification by ordinary Portland cement magnesium phosphate cement. Chemosphere 190:90–96
Yinan S, Deyi H, Junli Z, David OC, Guanghe L, Qingbao G, Shupeng L, Peng L (2018) Environmental and socio-economic sustainability appraisal of contaminated land remediation strategies: a case study at a mega-site in China. Sci Tot Environ 610-611:393–401
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuppusamy, S., Maddela, N.R., Megharaj, M., Venkateswarlu, K. (2020). Case Studies on Remediation of Sites Contaminated with Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. In: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24035-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24035-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24034-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24035-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)