Abstract
Science teachers often work with students in an effort to develop cognitive strategies toward understanding science through various modes of writing. The two modes of writing that have been extensively explored through traditional science education research are argumentative writing, in which the objective is to convince someone of a viewpoint using evidence, and summary writing, which is explanatory writing pulling across multiple domains of knowledge. The increased focus on cognitive strategies coupled with the concept of cognitive demand called for in the Next Generation Science Standards creates a need to examine and triangulate claims regarding identified cognitive attributes such as critical thinking, using neuroimaging techniques. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of writing type and audience on localized hemodynamic response in college-aged students. Cognitive dynamics are assessed using functional near-infrared spectroscopy, a novel neuroimaging technology. The standardized hemodynamic responses were tested for differences using repeated measures ANOVA (rANOVA). rANOVA reveals a main effect of writing type (summary or argumentative) across the grouping of audience (F(1,2) = 32.00 p = 0.030), with argumentative writing (mean = 3.89 ± 0.015) activations significantly lower in optodes locations 15 and 16. Group differences highlight changes in processing areas dependent on the type of writing and audience and suggest independence of activations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Antonenko, P., Paas, F., Grabner, R., & van Gog, T. (2010). Using electroencephalography to measure cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4), 425–438.
Antonenko, P. D., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2010). The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 140–150.
Ayres, H. (2006). Education and opportunity as influences on career development: Findings from a preliminary study in Eastern Australian tourism. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 5(1), 16–27.
Banville, H., & Falk, T. H. (2016). Recent advances and open challenges in hybrid brain-computer interfacing: A technological review of non-invasive human research. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 3(1), 9–46.
Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods. London: Oxford University Press.
Davis, T., LaRocque, K. F., Mumford, J. A., Norman, K. A., Wagner, A. D., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014). What do differences between multi-voxel and univariate analysis mean? How subject-, voxel-, and trial- level variance impact fMRI analysis. NeuroImage, 97, 271–283.
Delpy, D. T., & Cope, M. (1997). Quantification in tissue near–infrared spectroscopy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 352(1354), 649–659.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.
Ferrari, M., & Quaresima, V. (2012). A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. NeuroImage, 63(2), 921–935.
Fiez, J. A., & Petersen, S. E. (1998). Neuroimaging studies of word reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(3), 914–921.
Gefen, D., Ayaz, H., & Onaral, B. (2014). Applying functional near-infrared (fNIRS) spectroscopy to enhance MIS research. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3), 55–73.
Gerbier, E., & Toppino, T. C. (2015). The effect of distributed practice: Neuroscience, cognition, and education. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4(3), 49–59.
Grimberg, B. I., & Hand, B. (2009). Cognitive pathways: Analysis of students’ written texts for science understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 503–521.
Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2007). Writing for learning in science: A secondary analysis of six studies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 615–637.
Harrison, J., İzzetoğlu, K., Ayaz, H., Willems, B., Hah, S., Ahlstrom, U., et al. (2014). Cognitive workload and learning assessment during the implementation of a next-generation air traffic control technology using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 44(4), 429–440.
Herff, C., Heger, D., Fortmann, O., Hennrich, J., Putze, F., & Schultz, T. (2014). Mental workload during n-back task – Quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 935.
Hussein, A. (2015). The use of triangulation in social sciences research: Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 1(8), 1–12.
Izzetoglu, K., Bunce, S., Izzetoglu, M., Onaral, B., & Pourrezaei, K. (2003, September). fNIR spectroscopy as a measure of cognitive task load. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37439) (Vol. 4, pp. 3431–3434). IEEE.
Jang, J. Y. (2011). The effect of using a structured reading framework on middle school students’ conceptual understanding within the science writing heuristic approach. Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa
Johnson, M. H., & De Haan, M. (2015). Developmental cognitive neuroscience: An introduction. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
Justen, C., Herbert, C., Werner, K., & Raab, M. (2014). Self vs. other: Neural correlates underlying agent identification based on unimodal auditory information as revealed by electrotomography (sLORETA). Neuroscience, 259, 25–34.
Kesterke, N., Egeter, J., Erhardt, J. B., Jost, B., & Giesinger, K. (2015). Patient-reported outcome assessment after total joint replacement: Comparison of questionnaire completion times on paper and tablet computer. Archives of orthopedic and trauma surgery, 135(7), 935–941.
Kim, S. G., & Ogawa, S. (2012). Biophysical and physiological origins of blood oxygenation level- dependent fMRI signals. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 32(7), 1188–1206.
Kitzbichler, M. G., Henson, R. N., Smith, M. L., Nathan, P. J., & Bullmore, E. T. (2011). Cognitive effort drives workspace configuration of human brain functional networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(22), 8259–8270.
Klimesch, W. (2012). Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(12), 606–617.
McDermott, M. A., & Hand, B. (2010). A secondary reanalysis of student perceptions of non-traditional writing tasks over a ten-year period. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 518–539.
McKendrick, R., Parasuraman, R., & Ayaz, H. (2015). Wearable functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Expanding vistas for neurocognitive augmentation. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, 27.
Meiri, H., Sela, I., Nesher, P., Izzetoglu, M., Izzetoglu, K., Onaral, B., et al. (2012). Frontal lobe role in simple arithmetic calculations: An fNIRS study. Neuroscience Letters, 510(1), 43–47.
Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429.
Peleg-Raibstein, D., Philipp, S., Feldon, J., & Yee, B. K. (2015). Individual difference in prepulse inhibition does not predict spatial learning and memory performance in C57BL/6 mice. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(4), 878–888.
Perry-Smith, J. E. (2014). Social network ties beyond nonredundancy: An experimental investigation of the effect of knowledge content and tie strength on creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 831.
Prior, P., & Thorne, S. L. (2014). Research paradigms: Beyond product, process, and social activity. Handbook of writing and text production, 10, 31.
Ravet, J., & Williams, J. H. (2017). What we know now: Education, neuroscience and transdisciplinary autism research. Educational Research, 59(1), 1–16.
Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35(1), 83–92.
Sá, W. C., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 497.
Sandoval, W. (2014). Science education’s need for a theory of epistemological development. Science Education, 98(3), 383–387.
San Martin, R., & Huettel, S. A. (2013). Cognitive functions as revealed by imaging of the human brain. In Neuroscience in the 21st century: From basic to clinical (pp. 2213–2238).
Shewokis, P. A., Ayaz, H., Curtin, A., Izzetoglu, K., & Onaral, B. (2013, July). Brain in the loop learning using functional near infrared spectroscopy. In International Conference on Augmented Cognition (pp. 381–389). Berlin, Germany/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Son, T., Wang, B., Lu, Y., Chen, Y., Cao, D., & Yao, X. (2017, February). Concurrent OCT imaging of stimulus evoked retinal neural activation and hemodynamic responses. Proceedings of SPIE Volume, 10045, 1004522–1004521.
Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lamb, R., Hand, B., Yoon, S.Y. (2019). An Exploratory Neuroimaging Study of Argumentative and Summary Writing. In: Prain, V., Hand, B. (eds) Theorizing the Future of Science Education Research. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24013-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24013-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24012-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24013-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)