Skip to main content

Dermostyx (IB1): High Efficacy and Safe Topical Skin Protectant Against Percutaneous Toxic Agents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Skin Decontamination

Abstract

Prevention of the penetration of toxic agents through the skin is crucial for both military troops and civilian populations. We have developed a novel topical skin protectant (TSP), coded as IB1 and commercially available as Dermostyx protective solution (Rekah Pharm, Israel). The formulation afforded significant protection against chemical warfare agents (CWAs) such as sulfur mustard (SM) and VX (2LD50), pesticides such as parathion, and irritants such as acrolein. The efficacy of the protectant was evaluated in the pig model using clinical, histological, and biochemical monitoring. A single topical application prior to exposure to the toxic agents reduced significantly the size and severity of skin lesions and ameliorated or prevented systemic clinical symptoms. The barrier properties of IB1 are immediate upon application and remain effective for at least 12 h. It is absorbed into the stratum corneum of the skin and remains there until rinsing with water, yet the ingredients are not absorbed into the body. The formulation is a hydrophilic water-based solution, composed of magnesium sulfate and glycerin that are widely used in cosmetics and medicine, and was shown to be safe in preclinical and in Phase I clinical studies. The suggested mode of action is based on the unique interaction of glycerin with the stratum corneum, changing its properties to hydrophilic and on the “salting out” effect of magnesium sulfate. The expected use of the TSP is by application on exposed skin areas and sensitive skin sites (e.g., armpits, groin, waist), when necessary. A quantity of 10 ml is sufficient for one application covering approximately 20% of the body surface area. The formulation was approved for human use by the Israel Ministry of Health and a CE mark certificate in Europe has been recently issued (Class I). Dermostyx has been adopted by the IDF and first responders as a skin protectant for special needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Braue EH. Development of a reactive topical skin protectant. J Appl Toxicol. 1999;1:S47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kadar T, Fishbine E, Meshulam J, Sahar R, Amir A, Barness I. A topical skin protectant against chemical warfare agents. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003;5:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eisenkraft A, Vidan A, Robenshtok E, Shochat T, Hourvitz A, Dushnitsky T. Phase I study of a protective cream against chemical warfare agents. Mil Med. 2009;174:47–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan EJS, Brown A, Lundy P, et al. Site-specific percutaneous absorption of methyl salicylate and VX in domestic swine. J Appl Toxicol. 2002;22:141–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kadar T, Fishbine E, Meshulam Y, Sahar R, Chapman S, Liani H, Barness I, Amir A. Treatment of skin injuries induced by sulfur mustard with calmodulin antagonists, using the pig model. J Appl Toxicol. 2000;20:S133–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Babin MC, Ricketts K, Skvorak JP, Gazaway M, Mitcheltree LW, Casillas RP. Systemic administration of candidate antivesicants to protect against topically applied sulfur mustard in the mouse ear vesicant model (MEVM). J Appl Toxicol. 2000;20:S141–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dachir S, Fishbine E, Meshulam Y, Sahar R, Amir A, Kadar T. Screening of potential anti-inflammatory treatments against cutaneous sulfur mustard using the mouse ear vesicant model. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002;21:197–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dachir S, Fishbeine E, Meshulam Y, Sahar R, Chapman S, Amir A, Kadar T. Amelioration of sulfur mustard skin injury following a topical treatment with a mixture of a steroid and a NSAID. J Appl Toxicol. 2004;24:107–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Munro NB, Ambrose KR, Watson AP. Toxicity of the organophosphate chemical warfare agents GA, GB and VX. Implications for public protection. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102:18–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayes GR, Funckes AJ Jr, Hartwell WV. Dermal exposure of human volunteers to parathion. Arch Environ Health. 1964;8:829–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kramer RE, Wellman SE, Zhu H, Rockhold RW, Baker RC. A comparison of cholinesterase activity after intravenous, oral or dermal administration of methyl parathion. J Biomed Sci. 2002;9:140–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghilarducci DP, Tjeerdema RS. Fate and effects of acrolein. Environ Contam Toxicol. 1995;144:95–146.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bein K, Leikauf GD. Acrolein – a pulmonary hazard. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011;55:1342–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dachir S, Cohen M, Cohen L, Buch H, Kadar T. Acute and long-term ocular effects of acrolein vapor on the eyes and potential therapies. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2015;34:286–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson CD, Russell RL. A rapid simple radiometric assay for cholinesterase, suitable for multiple determinations. Anal Biochem. 1975;64:229–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Koper O, Lucas E, Klabunde KJ. Development of reactive topical skin protectants against sulfur mustard and nerve agents. J Appl Toxicol. 1999;19:S59–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Braue EH, Smith KH, Doxzon BF, Lumpkin HL, Clarkson ED. Efficacy studies of reactive skin decontamination lotion, M291 skin decontamination kit, 0.5% bleach, 1% soapy water, and skin exposure reduction paste against chemical warfare agents, part 1: guinea pigs challenged with VX. Cut Ocular Toxicol. 2011;30:15–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Braue EH, Smith KH, Doxzon BF, Lumpkin HL, Clarkson ED. Studies of reactive skin decontamination lotion, M291 skin decontamination kit, 0.5% bleach, 1% soapy water, and skin exposure reduction paste against chemical warfare agents, part 1: guinea pigs challenged with soman. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2011;30:29–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Elias PM. Dynamics of the epidermal barrier: new implications for percutaneous drug delivery, topical therapeutics and disease pathogenesis. Prog Dermatol. 1992;26:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu DK, Wannemacher RW, Snider TH, Hayes TL. Efficacy of the topical skin protectant in advanced development. In Proceedings of the 1998 Medical Defense Bioscience Review. US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, MD, USA, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Silva CL, Topgaard D, Kocherbitov V, Sousa JJS, Pais AACC, Sparr E. Stratum corneum hydration: phase transformations and mobility in stratum corneum, extracted lipids and isolated corneocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1768:2647–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reiger MM, Deem DE. Skin moisturizers. The effects of cosmetic ingredients on human stratum corneum. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1974;25:253–62.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Batt MD, Fairhurst E. Hydration of the stratum corneum. Int J Cosmet Sci. 1986;8:253–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fluhr JW, Gloor M, Lehmann L, Lazzerini S, Distante F, Berardesca E. Glycerol accelerates recovery of barrier function in vivo. Acta Derm Venereol. 1999;79:418–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Skin exposure reduction paste against chemical warfare agents (SERPACWA). www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2000/21084lbl.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shlomit Dachir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dachir, S. et al. (2020). Dermostyx (IB1): High Efficacy and Safe Topical Skin Protectant Against Percutaneous Toxic Agents. In: Zhu, H., Maibach, H. (eds) Skin Decontamination. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24009-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24009-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24008-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24009-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics