Skip to main content

Abstract

Text mining is a research field that has developed different techniques to find relevant information in unstructured data, such as texts. This article tries to verify whether the automatic extraction of information from texts can help students in reading comprehension activities. Two studies involving control and experimental groups were carried out with students of 5th and 8th grade in order to evaluate whether a particular text mining tool could effectively help students improve their scores in a reading task. We also wanted to verify if the use of the tool by students in different grades could yield different outcomes. Results showed that the mining tool helped 5th graders to improve their scores, but it was not so effective for 8th graders. These results indicate the potential of the proposed tool especially for learners who are still developing their reading skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allahyari, M., et al.: A brief survey of text mining: classification, clustering and extraction techniques. In: Proceedings of Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - KDD, Halifax, Canada (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beers, K.: When Kids Can’t Read. What Teachers Can Do. Heinemann, Portsmouth (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Block, C.C., Pressley, M.: Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices. Solving Problems in the Teaching of Literacy. Guilford Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, K.E., Sung, Y.T., Chen, S.F.: Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 17(1), 21–33 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chein, M., Mugnier, M.-L.: Graph-Based Knowledge Representation: Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs, 1st edn. Springer, London (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cordón, L.A., Day, J.D.: Strategy use on standardized reading comprehension tests. J. Educ. Psychol. 88(2), 288–295 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Giacomo, D., Cofini, V., Di Mascio, T., Rosita, C.M., Fiorenzi, D., Gennari, R., Vittorini, P.: The silent reading supported by adaptive learning technology: influence in the children outcomes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55(1), 1125–1130 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guastello, E.F., Beasley, T.M., Sinatra, R.C.: Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial Spec. Educ. 21(6), 356–364 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall, T., Strangman, N.: Graphic organizers. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum, Wakefield (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. He, W.: Examining students’ online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(1), 90–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsu, J.-L., Chou, H.-W., Chang, H.-H.: EduMiner: using text mining for automatic formative assessment. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(4), 3431–3439 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hyerle, D.: Visual Tools for Transforming Information Into Knowledge. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jamshidifarsani, H., Garbaya, S., Lim, T., Blazevic, P., Ritchie, J.M.: Technology-based reading intervention programs for elementary grades: an analytical review. Comput. Educ. 128(1), 427–451 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jenner, J.: A bridge to reading and writing literacy: developing oral language skills in young children. Pacific Educator (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manoli, P., Papadopoulou, M.: Graphic organizers as a reading strategy: research findings and issues. Creative Educ. 3, 348–356 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.33055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J., Pollock, J.E.: Classroom Instruction that Works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nandhini, K., Balasundaram, S.R.: Improving readability through extractive summaries for learners with reading difficulties. Egyptian Inform. J. 14(1), 195–204 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. NIH Publication. No. 00-4769 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.1950070418

  19. Nesbit, J.C., Adesope, O.O.: Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis. J. Rev. Educ. Res. 76(3), 413–448 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reader, W., Hammond, N.: Computer-based tools to support learning from hypertext: concept mapping tools and beyond. Comput. Educ. 12, 99–106 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reategui, E., Epstein, D., Lorenzatti, A., Klemann, M., Sobek: a text mining tool for educational applications. In: International Conference on Data Mining, Las Vegas, USA, pp. 59–64 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roman-Sanchez, J.M.: Self-regulated learning procedure for university students: the meaningful text-reading strategy. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 2(1), 113–132 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Romero, C., Cazorla, M., Buzón, O.: Meaninful learning using concept maps as a learning strategy. J. Technol. Sci. 7(3), 313–332 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schenker, A.: Graph-theoretic techniques for web content mining. Ph.D. thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shatnawi, S., Gaber, M.M., Cocea, M.: Text stream mining for massive open online courses: review and perspectives. Syst. Sci. Control Eng. 2(1), 664–676 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sweeny, S.M.: Writing for the instant messaging and text messaging generation: using new literacies to support writing instruction. J. Adolesc. Adult Literacy 54(2), 121–130 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tankersley, K.: The Threads of Reading: Strategies for Literacy Development. ASDC, Alexandria (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tovani, C.: I Read But I Don’t Get It. Comprehension Strategies for Young Adolescent Readers. Stenhouse Publishers, Portsmouth (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Trend, D.: The End of Reading: From Gutenberg to Grand Theft Auto. Peter Lang Publishing, New York (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Warschauer, Mark: Laptops and Literacy: Learning in the Wireless Classroom. Teachers College Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wiecha, J.L., Sobol, A.M., Peterson, K.E., Gortmaker, S.L.: Household television access: associations with screen time, reading and homework among youth. Ambul. Pediatr. 1(5), 244–251 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu, Y., Reynolds, N.: Using text mining techniques to analyze students’ written responses to a teacher leadership dilemma. Int. J. Comput. Theory Eng. 4(4), 575 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu, C.H., DiGangi, S.A., Jannasch-Pennell, A.: Using text mining for improving student experience management in higher education. In: Tripathi, P., Mukerji, S. (eds.) Cases on Innovations in Educational Marketing: Transnational and Technological Strategies, pp. 196–213. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2011). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-599-5.ch012

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliseo Reategui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Reategui, E., Epstein, D., Bastiani, E., Carniato, M. (2020). Can Text Mining Support Reading Comprehension?. In: Gennari, R., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 9th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1007 . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23990-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics