Skip to main content

Recommending Tasks in Online Judges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1007 ))

Abstract

Online Judges are e-learning tools used to improve the programming skills, typically for programming contests such as International Olympiads in Informatics and ACM International Collegiate Programming Contest.

In this context, due to the nowadays broad list of programming tasks available in Online Judges, it is crucial to help the learner by recommending a challenging but not unsolvable task. So far, in the literature, few authors focused on Recommender Systems (RSs) for Online Judges; in this paper we discuss some peculiarities of this problem, that prevent the use of standard RSs, and address a first building brick: the assessment of (relative) tasks hardness.

We also present the results of a preliminary experimental evaluation of our approach, that proved to be effective against the available dataset, consisting in all the submissions made in the Italian National Online Judge, used to train students for the Italian Olympiads in Informatics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ala-Mutka, K.M.: A survey of automated assessment approaches for programming assignments. Comput. Sci. Educ. 15(2), 83–102 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amaroli, N., Audrito, G., Laura, L.: Fostering informatics education through teams olympiad. Olympiads Inf. 12, 133–146 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Astrachan, O.: Non-competitive programming contest problems as the basis for just-in-time teaching. In: 2004 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, FIE 2004, vol. 1, pp. T3H/20–T3H/24, October 2004

    Google Scholar 

  4. Audrito, G., Demo, G.B., Giovannetti, E.: The role of contests in changing informatics education: a local view. Olympiads Inf. 6, 3–20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blumenstein, M., Green, S., Fogelman, S., Nguyen, A., Muthukkumarasamy, V.: Performance analysis of game: a generic automated marking environment. Comput. Educ. 50, 1203–1216 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caiza, J., Del Alamo, J.: Programming assignments automatic grading: review of tools and implementations. In: INTED 2013 Proceedings of 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, 4–5 March 2013, pp. 5691–5700. IATED (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caro-Martinez, M., Jimenez-Diaz, G.: Similar users or similar items? Comparing similarity-based approaches for recommender systems in online judges. In: Aha, D.W., Lieber, J. (eds.) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, vol. 10339, pp. 92–107. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dagienė, V.: Sustaining informatics education by contests. In: International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools-Evolution and Perspectives, pp. 1–12. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Di Luigi, W, Fantozzi, P., Laura, L., Martini, G., Morassutto, E., Ostuni, D., Pic-cardo, G., Versari, L.: Learning analytics in competitive programming training systems. In: 2018 22nd International Conference Information Visualisation (IV), pp. 321–325, July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  10. Di Luigi, W., Farina, G., Laura, L., Nanni, U., Temperini, M., Versari, L.: Oii-web: an interactive online programming contest training system. Olympiads Inf. 10, 195–205 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Mascio, T., Laura, L., Temperini, M.: A framework for personalized competitive programming training. In: 2018 17th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), pp. 1–8, April 2018

    Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Mateos , G., Fernandez-Aleman, J.L.: Make learning fun with programming contests. In: Transactions on Edutainment II, pp. 246–257. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kurnia, A., Lim, A., Cheang, B.: Online judge. Comput. Educ. 36(4), 299–315 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Toledo, R.Y., Mota, Y.C.: An e-learning collaborative filtering approach to suggest problems to solve in programming online judges. Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol. 12(2), 51–65 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, T., Su, P., Ma, X., Wang, Y., Wang, K.: Ability-training-oriented automated assessment in introductory programming course. Comput. Educ. 56(1), 220–226 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yera, R., Martínez, L.: A recommendation approach for programming online judges supported by data preprocessing techniques. Appl. Intell. 47(2), 277–290 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yera Toledo, R., Caballero Mota, Y., Martínez, L.: A recommender system for programming online judges using fuzzy information modeling. Informatics 5(2), 17 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Laura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Audrito, G. et al. (2020). Recommending Tasks in Online Judges. In: Gennari, R., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 9th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1007 . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23990-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics