Skip to main content

Conclusions: The Way Forward in Achieving the SDGS—The Urgency of Transforming Our Agri-Food Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals Through Sustainable Food Systems
  • 1405 Accesses

Abstract

What we are now experiencing is the second great transformation in the Polanyian sense. The first was the one masterfully analyzed by Karl Polanyi in his famous book The Great Transformation, published in 1944, a study of the impacts on Western society of the first industrial revolution (England, second half of the eighteenth century) and of the second industrial revolution (Germany, late nineteenth century). The second great transformation makes reference to the third industrial revolution (in the 1970s) and to the fourth (typically starting with the new century). We do not yet know how and to what extent the new digital and artificial intelligence technologies will modify the central core of capitalism and its underlying cultural model. However, we do know that the convergent technologies of the NBIC group (nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, cognitive science) are having a significant impact on many fronts, in particular on the entire sector of our current agri-food systems, which have become unsustainable for both humans and nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bonanno, A., & Busch, L. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of the international political economy of agriculture and food. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C., & Barnett, J. (2018). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review. Meat Science., 143, 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi, G., & Bobbitt, P. (1978). Tragic choices New York. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Ehrlich, P. (2017). Why we are in the sixth great extinction and what it means to humanity. Cambridge: Mimeo. Retrieved from http://www.casinapioiv.va/content/accademia/it/publications/scriptavaria/extinction/dasgupta_ehrlich.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2013). Food wastage footprint: impacts on natural resources. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3347e/i3347e.pdf.

  • FAO (2014). Food wastage footprint. Full cost accounting. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3991e.pdf.

  • Godfray, H. C. J., Aveyard, P., Garnett, T., Hall, J. W., Key, T. J., Lorimer, J., Pierrehumbert, R. T., Scarborough, P., Springmann, M., & Jebb, S. A. (2018). Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science, 361(6399), eaam5324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HLPE, FAO, Nutrition and Food Systems. (2017). A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7846e.pdf.

  • iPES Food. (2017). Too big to feed. Retrieved from http://www.ipes-food.org/_img/upload/files/Concentration_ExecSummary.pdf.

  • Liakos, K., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagos, P., & Borelli, P. (2017). Soil erosion in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasca Palmer, C. (2018). Biodiversità. Una sfida decisiva per l’umanità. Ecoscienza, 2. Retrieved from https://www.arpae.it/cms3/documenti/_cerca_doc/ecoscienza/ecoscienza2018_2/editoriale.pdf.

  • Patel, R. (2009). Food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 663–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingali, P. (2017). The green revolution and crop biodiversity. In D. Hunter, L. Guarino, C. Spillane, & P. C. McKeown (Eds.), Routledge handbook of agricultural biodiversity. Abington: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987–992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. R., & Wratten, S. (2014). National carbon stocks: Move on to a carbon currency standard. Nature, 506(7488), 295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeller, D. S., & Bridgewater, P. (2016). The intergovernmental platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES): Progress and next steps. P. Biodivers Conserv, 25, 801.

    Google Scholar 

  • The State of European Food Tech. (2018). Dealroom and the French-Bolognese VC firm five seasons venture. Retrieved from https://foodtech.vc/.

  • Tuomisto, H. L. (2019). The eco-friendly burger: Could cultured meat improve the environmental sustainability of meat products? EMBO Reports, 20(1), e47395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2014). Global biodiversity outlook 4. Montréal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentini, R., & Miglietta, F. (Eds.). (2014). The greenhouse gas balance of Italy: An insight on managed and natural terrestrial ecosystems. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Braun, J. (2011). Increasing and more volatile food prices and the consumer. In The Oxford handbook of the economics of food consumption and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Braun, J. (2014). Food demand, natural resources, and nature. Sustainable humanity, sustainable nature: Our responsibility pontifical academy of sciences, Extra series 41, Vatican city 2014 Pontifical academy of social sciences, Acta 19, Vatican city 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezel, A., & David, C. (2012). Agroecology and the food system. In Agroecology and strategies for climate change (pp. 17–33). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(4), 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2018). The global risks report 2019 (13th ed.). Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GRR18_Report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, C., Kobayashi, K., Loladze, I., Zhu, J., Jiang, Q., Xu, X., Liu, G., Seneweera, S., Ebi, K. L., Drewnowski, A., Fukagawa, N. K., & Ziska, L. H. (2018). Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels this century will alter the protein, micronutrients, and vitamin content of rice grains with potential health consequences for the poorest rice-dependent countries. Science Advances, 4(5), eaaq1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Zamagni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zamagni, S. (2019). Conclusions: The Way Forward in Achieving the SDGS—The Urgency of Transforming Our Agri-Food Systems. In: Valentini, R., Sievenpiper, J., Antonelli, M., Dembska, K. (eds) Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals Through Sustainable Food Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23969-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics