Skip to main content

The Influence of Transformational Leadership Style on Innovation Behaviours: The Case of the Government Sector of the UAE

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the II International Triple Helix Summit (THS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 43))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 495 Accesses

Abstract

The UAE is putting a lot of efforts and investments to increase its innovation capacity within its various entities to be able to meet citizens needs. Therefore, the country is heavily investing in the development of its human resources. Previous studies have illustrated the importance of having an environment that is conducive to innovation within organisations, and that the innovation behaviour of employees is impacted by the style of leadership of the line managers of these employees. Transformational leadership was in particular found to be the most effective style in terms of fostering employees’ innovation. However, such relation was not explored in a country like the UAE. This paper aims to fill this gap, by studying how the transformational leadership style in a public organisation within the UAE as perceived by the employees impacted the innovation behaviour. A questionnaire was used to gather input for the study, adopting 2 widely accepted scales to measure the 2 variables under study. The results indicated that employees perceived their line managers to practice moderate levels of transformational leadership, and employees exercise moderate level of innovative behaviour. A correlation and a regression analyses were conducted to study the relationship between the variables, and the findings indicated that transformational leadership has a moderate impact on innovation behaviour of employees within the government sector in the UAE. This finding not only fill a gap in the literature, but also suggest practical actions that could be taken to increase transformational leaders within the country. A main limitation in the study is the target sample achieved, which is not only low, but also not very representative of multiple governmental entities within the country, which limits generalizability. Future research should take into consideration these limitation, as well as the differences that the demographics of the respondents could bring to the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Azimi M (2006) Transformational leadership and its relationship with creativity as perceived by civil employees in Ministry of Interior

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Gamidi S (2000) Transformational leadership in Saudi universities as owned and practiced by academic leaders. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Um Alqura University, Mecca

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Nasani A (2008) Testing the impact of the dimensions of transformational leadership on administrative creativity: a practical study of educational institutions in Syria. Tishreen Econ Law J 30(1):24–52

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold J, Arad S, Rhoades J, Drasgow F (2000) The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. J Organ Behav 21(3):249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bass BM, Avolio BJ (1995) Multifactor leadership questionnaire: manual leader form, rater, and scoring key for MLQ (form 5x-short). Mind Garden, Redwood City, CA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bass B, Avolio B, Jung D, Berson Y (2003) Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. J Appl Psychol 88(2):207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Jung DI, Berson Y (2003) Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. J Appl Psychol 88(2):207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burns JM (1978) Leadership. Harper and Row Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Charter R (2003) Study samples are too small to produce sufficiently precise reliability coefficients. J Gen Psychol 130(2):117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Jong J, Den Hartog D (2007) How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. Eur J Innov Manag 10(1):41–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Downton JV (1973) Rebel leadership: commitment and charisma in the revolutionary process. The Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eisenbeiß S, Boerner S (2010) Transformational leadership and R&D innovation: taking a curvilinear approach. Creat Innov Manag 19(4):364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elenkov D, Judge W, Wright P (2005) Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: an international multi-cluster comparative study. Strateg Manag J 26(7):665–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elkins T, Keller R (2003) Leadership in research and development organizations: a literature review and conceptual framework. Leadersh Quart 14(4–5):587–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fritz D, Ibrahim N (2010) The impact of leadership longevity on innovation in a religious organization. J Bus Ethics 96(2):223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. García-Morales V, Matías-Reche F, Hurtado-Torres N (2008) Influence of transformational leadership on organizational innovation and performance depending on the level of organizational learning in the pharmaceutical sector. J Organ Change Manag 21(2):188–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hay I (2006) Transformational leadership: characteristics and criticisms. Organ Learn Leadersh 5:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jones PM, George AM (2004) The ABC transporter structure and mechanism: perspectives on recent research. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 61(6):682–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kellermanns F, Eddleston K, Barnett T, Pearson A (2008) An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Fam Bus Rev 21(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Long C, Thean L (2011) Relationship between leadership style, job satisfaction and employees’ turnover intention: a literature review. Res J Bus Manag 5(3):91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McAdam R, Keogh W (2004) Transitioning towards creativity and innovation measurement in SMEs. Creat Innov Manag 13(2):126–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mosadeghrad AM (2003) Principles of health care administration. Dibagran Tehran, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mosadeghrad AM (2004) The handbook of hospital professional organization and management (2). Dibagran Tehran, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mumford M, Scott G, Gaddis B, Strange J (2002) Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadersh Quart 13(6):705–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oldham G, Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Acad Manag J 39(3):607–634

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oshagbemi T (1996) Job satisfaction of UK academics. Educ Manag Adm 24(4):389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Papadakis V, Bourantas D (1998) The chief executive officer as corporate champion of technological innovation: an empirical investigation. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 10(1):89–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pastor JC, Mayo M (2006) Transformational and transactional leadership: an examination of managerial cognition among spanish (No. wp06–13). Instituto de Empresa, Area of Economic Environment

    Google Scholar 

  29. Piccolo R, Colquitt J (2006) Transformational leadership and job behaviors: the mediating role of core job characteristics. Acad Manag J 49(2):327–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rao A, Kareem Abdul W (2015) Impact of transformational leadership on team performance: an empirical study in UAE. Meas Bus Excel 19(4):30–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reuvers M, van Engen M, Vinkenburg C, Wilson-Evered E (2008) Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: exploring the relevance of gender differences. Creat Innov Manag 17(3):227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Roberts R (1998) Managing innovation: the pursuit of competitive advantage and the design of innovation intense environments. Res Policy 27(2):159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sarros J, Santora J (2001) The transformational-transactional leadership model in practice. Leadersh Organ Dev J 22(8):383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Scott S, Bruce R (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manag J 37(3):580–607

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shaw M, Stogdill R (1974) Handbook of leadership: a survey of theory and research. Adm Sci Quart 19(4):584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shin SJ, Zhou J (2003) Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: evidence from Korea. Acad Manag J 46(6):703–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Urabe K, Child J, Kagono T (1988) Innovation and management. W. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Winston BE, Patterson K (2006) An integrative definition of leadership. Int J Leadersh Stud 1(2):6–66

    Google Scholar 

  39. Woodman R, Sawyer J, Griffin R (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manag Rev 18(2):293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xirasagar S (2008) Transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership among physician executives. J Health Organ Manage 22(6):599–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yahchouchi G (2009). Employee’s perceptions of Lebanese manager’s leadership styles and organizational commitment. Int J Leadersh Stud 4(2):127–140

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zaltman G, Duncan R, Holbek J (1973) Innovation and Organizations

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid Al Marri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abdulqader, A., Al Marri, K. (2020). The Influence of Transformational Leadership Style on Innovation Behaviours: The Case of the Government Sector of the UAE. In: Abu-Tair, A., Lahrech, A., Al Marri, K., Abu-Hijleh, B. (eds) Proceedings of the II International Triple Helix Summit. THS 2018. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23898-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23898-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23897-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23898-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics