Skip to main content

Care Robots: From Tools of Care to Training Opportunities. Moral Considerations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1008 ))

Abstract

New technology should not perceived as a threat: on the contrary, it is a resource. It is our job to use it in the most appropriate way. Moreover, new technology can make a significant contribution to nurse training: for example, immersion into virtual reality with a visor and a simple application does not only allow one to experience fantastic adventures, but also to enjoy a relationship with the patient through simulation. Also, virtual reality can promote patient/teacher interaction: both, for example, can be projected or immersed in virtual reality, or the teacher can project his ‘virtual’ image into a real scenario. However, robots too could contribute to training nursing staff: health operator training courses today widely use dummies which are appropriately planned for standing training. They are increasingly true-to-life, favouring empathy with the clinical situation simulated each time and allowing the student to exercise not only technical abilities, but also critical thinking, the ability to work in a team and communication skills. We shall examine some moral questions linked to the increasingly frequent use of human-faceted robots to train nursing staff.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Borenstein, J., Pearson, Y.: Robot caregivers: harbingers of expanded freedom for all? Ethics Inf. Technol. 12, 277–288 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Robin, B., et al.: Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 4, 105–120 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vallor, S.: Carebots and caregivers: sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the 21st century. Philos. Technol. 24(3), 251–268 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coeckelbergh, M.: Health care, capabilities, and ai assistive technologies. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 13, 181–190 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouchard, S., et al.: Effectiveness of virtual reality exposure in the treatment of arachnophobia using 3D games. Technol. Health Care 14(1), 19–27 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia-Palacios, A., et al.: virtual reality in the treatment of spider phobia: a controlled study. Behav. Res. Ther. 40, 983–993 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, Z., et al.: Impact of using a robot patient for nursing skill training in patient transfer. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(2), 355–366 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maidhof, W., Mazzola, N., Lacroix, N.: Student perceptions of using a human patient simulator for basic cardiac assessment. Currents Pharm. Teach. Learn. 4(1), 29–33 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moodley, T., Gopalan, D.: Airway skills training using a human patient simulator. Southern African J. Anaesth. Analg. 20(3), 147–151 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yinka, B.: Pediatric robot patient offers new level of realism for doctors in training. Medical Press, 10 September 2018. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-09-pediatric-robot-patient-realism-doctors.html

  11. Tan, G.M., Ti, L.K., Suresh, S., Ho, B.S., Lee, T.L.: Teaching first-year medical students physiology: does the human patient simulator allow for more effective teaching? Singapore Med. J. 43(5), 238–242 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alinier, G., Hunt, B., Gordon, R., Harwood, C.: Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. J. Adv. Nurs. 54(3), 359–369 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crofts, J.F., Bartlett, C., Ellis, D., Hunt, L.P., Fox, R., Draycott, T.J.: Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins. Obstet. Gynecol. 108(6), 1477–1485 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cioffi, J., Purcal, N., Arundell, F.: A pilot study to investigate the effect of a simulation strategy on the clinical decision making of midwifery students. J. Nurs. Edu. 44(3), 131–134 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. La Cerra, C., et al.: Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition Scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 9(2) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Persico, L.: A review: using simulation-based education to substitute traditional clinical rotations. JOJ Nurs. Health Care 9(3), 1–7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.19080/JOJNHC.2018.09.555762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharkey, N., Sharkey, A.: The rights and wrongs of robot care. In: Lin, P., Abney, K., Bekey, G. (eds.) Robot Ethics: The Ethical ans Social Implications of Robotics, pp. 267–282. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, S., et al.: The uncanny valley: existence and explanations. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 19(4), 393–407 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. MacDorman, K.F., Ishiguro, H.: The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social Science research. Interact. Stud.: Soc. Behav. Commun. Biol. Artif. Syst. 7, 297–337 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saygin, A.P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J., Frith, C.: The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 413–422 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., Ishiguro, H.: Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19(1–2), 61–84 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mori, M.: The uncanny valley (1970). Energy 7(4), 33–35 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mc Dorman, K.: Androids as an experimental apparatus: why is there an uncanny valley and can we exploit it? In: CogSci2005 Workshop: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, pp. 108–118. Stresa (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carpenter, J.: Deus Sex Machina: loving robot sex workers and the allure of an insincere kiss. In: Danaher, J., McArthur, N. (eds.) Robot Sex. Social and Ethical Implications, pp. 261–287. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Balistreri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Balistreri, M., Casile, F. (2020). Care Robots: From Tools of Care to Training Opportunities. Moral Considerations. In: Popescu, E., Belén Gil, A., Lancia, L., Simona Sica, L., Mavroudi, A. (eds) Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 9th International Conference, Workshops. MIS4TEL 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1008 . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23884-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics