Skip to main content

The “Tokenization” of the eParticipation in Public Governance: An Opportunity to Hack Democracy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Blockchain and Applications (BLOCKCHAIN 2019)

Abstract

Currently Distributed Ledger Technologies-DLTs, and especially the Blockchain technology, are an excellent opportunity for public institutions to transform the channels of citizen participation and reinvigorate democratic processes. These technologies permit the simplification of processes and make it possible to safely and securely manage the data stored in its records. This guarantees the transmission and public transparency of information, and thus leads to the development of a new citizen governance model by using technology such as a BaaS (Blockchain as a Service) platform. G-Cloud solutions would facilitate a faster deployment in the cities and provide scalability to foster the creation of Smart Citizens within the philosophy of Open Government. The development of an eParticipation model that can configure a tokenizable system of the actions and processes that citizens currently exercise in democratic environments is an opportunity to guarantee greater participation and thus manage more effective local democratic spaces. Therefore, a Blockchain solution in eDemocracy platforms is an exciting new opportunity to claim a new pattern of management amongst the agents that participate in the public sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). https://bitcoin.org/files/bitcoin-paper/bitcoin_es.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2019

  2. Hedera hashgraph plattform. https://www.hedera.com/platform. Accessed 7 Feb 2019

  3. IOTA foundation tangle protocol. https://www.iota.org/research/meet-the-tangle. Accessed 7 Feb 2019

  4. Alexopoulos, C., Charalabidis, Y., Androutsopoulou, A.: Benefits and obstacles of blockchain applications in E-Government. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3377–3386 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, J., Karduck, A.: A methodology for digital government transformation. J. Econ., Bus. Manag. 5(6), 246–254 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morabito, V.: Blockchain governance. In: Business Innovation Through Blockchain: The B3 Perspective, pp. 41–59. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glaser, F., et al.: Blockchain as a platform. In: Treiblmaier, H., Beck, R. (eds.) Business Transformation through Blockchain, vol. I, Pp. 121–143. Palgrave MacMillan (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Springall, D., et al.: Security analysis of the estonian Internet voting system. https://estoniaevoting.org/downloads/. Accessed 25 Mar 2019

  9. Rauchs, M., et al.: Distributed ledger technology systems: a conceptual framework. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. IIIT Hyderabad: Cloud computing for e-Governance, White Paper (2010). http://search.iiit.ac.in/uploads/CloudComputingForEGovernance.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2019

  11. Bitnation Governance 2.0 Platform. https://tse.bitnation.co/. Accessed 9 Feb 2019

  12. Follow My Vote Platform. https://followmyvote.com/. Accessed 9 Feb 2019

  13. BoardRoom Platform. http://boardroom.to/#About. Accessed 9 Feb 2019

  14. CONSUL Project. http://consulproject.org/en/index.html. Accessed 9 Feb 2019

  15. TIVI Online Voting System. https://tivi.io/. Accessed 9 Feb 2019

  16. Fernández, M.: Descifrar las smart cities: Qué queremos decir cuando hablamos de smart cities, pp. 183–185, Caligrama Editorial, Madrid (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Romero-Frías, E., Arroyo-Machado, W.: Policy labs in Europe: political innovation, structure and content analysis on Twitter. In: El profesional de la información, 27(6), 1181–1192 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. LabIn Granada: Social Innovation Lab. https://labingranada.org/. Accessed 10 Feb 2019

  19. Garriga-Portolá, M., López Ventura, J.: The role of open government in smart cities. In: Open Government Public Administration and Information Technology 4. Springer, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, Z., Chan, T.H.H.: How to vote privately using bitcoin. In: International Conference on Information and Communications Security, pp. 82–96. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hopwood, D., et al.: Zcash protocol specification. Technical Report 2016-1.10, Zerocoin Electric Coin Company (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. McCorry, P., Shahandashti, S.F., Hao, F.: A smart contract for boardroom voting with maximum voter privacy. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2017, 110 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, B., et al.: Platform-independent secure blockchain-based voting system. In: Chen, L., Manulis, M., Schneider, S. (eds.) Information Security, ISC. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11060, pp. 369–386. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Annae, R., Freeland, R., Theodoropoulos, G.: E-voting requirements and implementation. In: 2007 The 9th IEEE CEC/EEE 2007, pp. 382–392. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, K.H., et al.: A review of contemporary e-voting: requirements, technology, systems. In: Data Science and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–47 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ayed, A.B.: A conceptual secure blockchain-based electronic voting system. Int. J. Netw. Secur. Appl. 9(3) 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hardwick, F.S., Gioulis, A., Akram, R.N.: E-voting with blockchain: an e-voting protocol with decentralisation and voter privacy. ISG-SCC, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Naranjo-Zolotov, M., et al.: Examining social capital and individual motivators to explain the adoption of online participation. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 92, 302–311 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Francisco Luis Benítez Martínez , María Visitación Hurtado Torres or Esteban Romero Frías .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Benítez Martínez, F.L., Hurtado Torres, M.V., Romero Frías, E. (2020). The “Tokenization” of the eParticipation in Public Governance: An Opportunity to Hack Democracy. In: Prieto, J., Das, A., Ferretti, S., Pinto, A., Corchado, J. (eds) Blockchain and Applications. BLOCKCHAIN 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1010 . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23813-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics