Skip to main content

Modularization Challenges in Prolog: What to Divide and Conquer in AI

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making (INFUS 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1029))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2750 Accesses

Abstract

Although Prolog is considered to be the language of choice for decision support systems and most of the other fields of applied artificial intelligence, developing large projects with Prolog can become a complicated task. A programming language with adequate support for modularization can facilitate easier handling and reuse of different forms of control such as fuzzy logic. It is our view that this support can be provided without modifying the original logical programming paradigm. This paper aims to present an initial approach to this challenge by presenting an analysis of the requirements of modularization that originate from the artificial intelligence domain and the peculiarities of the Prolog language itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Organization for Standardiztion. Information technology – Programming languages – Prolog – Part 2: Modules, 2000. ISO/IEC 13211-2

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haemmerlé, R., Fages, F.: Modules for Prolog Revisited. International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP), pp. 41–55, Logic Programming (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard, M., Jacquenet, F.: Modularity and Genericity revised for PROLOG. Computer Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wielemaker, J., Hildebrand, M., Ossenbruggen, J.: Using Prolog as the fundament for applications on the semantic web. Applications of Logic Programming and to the web, Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services 287, 84–98 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wielemaker, J., Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B.: Prolog-based Infrastructure for RDF- performance and scalability. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) The Semantic Web - Proceedings ISWC’03, October 2003, Sanibel Island, Florida, LNCS 2870, pp. 644–658, Springer Verlag, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holte, S., Nadathur, G.: Modularity and Separate Compilation in Logic Programming (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winston, P.H.: Artificial intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Ma, third edition (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cabeza, D., Hermenegildo, M.: A new module system for Prolog. First International Conference on Computational Logic, July, 2000, LNAI, vol. 1861, pp. 131–148. Springer-Verlag (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bugliesi, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P.: Modularity in logic programming. J. Logic Program. 19(20), 443–502 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, D.: A proposal for modules in lambda Prolog. In: Proceedings of the 1993 Workshop on Extensions to Logic Programming, LNCS, vol. 798, pp. 206–221 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nadathur, G., Miller, D.: An Overview of Lambda Prolog, Technical Report, University of Pennsylvania, Scholarly Commons, Department of Computer and Information Science, June (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ishizuka, M., Kanai, N.: Prolog-Elf incorporating fuzzy logic. In: IJCAI 9, vol. 2, pp. 701–703 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldwin, J.F., Martin, T.P., Pilsworth, B.W.: Fril: Fuzzy and Evidential Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence. John Wiley and Sons (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, D., Liu, D.: A Fuzzy Prolog Database System. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, R.C.T.: Fuzzy logic and the resolution principle. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 19(1), 119–129 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Midainan Jean Kemtongue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kemtongue, M.J., Egesoy, A. (2020). Modularization Challenges in Prolog: What to Divide and Conquer in AI. In: Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Tolga, A., Sari, I. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making. INFUS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics