Abstract
This final chapter addresses the question with which the book commenced: are Instructional Leadership and Leadership for Learning two sides of the same coin or are they two very different approaches to leading school improvement? The argument is put that leadership for learning is very different, though the influence of the former is embedded in the domains and practices of the latter. There is, however, a distinctive orientation towards voluntarism and collective activity in explanations of leadership for learning, transcending the determinism and individualism implicit in instructional leadership. This position is elaborated and justified in the discussion of a set of themes derived from the chapters in this book, supplemented by research findings and scholarly writing from added sources. Given this corpus of work, it is undeniable that there is now a comprehensive research-informed knowledge base on what it takes to connect leadership activities with the improvement of student learning and achievement. Two examples of “frameworks” are highlighted in the chapter and used as seven themes are examined, namely (1) the obligation to embrace the moral purpose of the educator, (2) the pedagogical value in listening to student voice, (3) the relentless focus on learning, (4) the wide engagement of people in leadership activities, (5) the downplaying of structural hierarchies, (6) the networking of partners in leadership and (7) understanding the context and harnessing its resources in support of learning. The conclusion reached highlights the need for leadership coalitions with people tightly connected in their commitment to the purpose of education, people who know and understand children and the needs, hopes and aspirations they and their communities have. Leadership for learning, seen in this light, is much more than instructional leadership. It relies less on positional power and more on principals, teachers, students and community agents exercising autonomy in collective actions committed to making a difference in the life journey of learners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organisational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Branch, S., Homel, R., & Freiberg, K. (2012). Making the developmental system work better for children: Lessons learned from the Circles of Care Programme. Child and Family Social Work, 18, 294–304.
Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258.
Dempster, N., Lizzio, A., Keeffe, M., Skinner, J., & Andrews, D. (2010). The contributions of research design and process facilitation in accessing adolescent views of leadership. Leading and Managing, 16(2), 77–89.
Dinham, S. (2005). Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(4), 338–356.
Earp, J. (2017). Global education: 21st century skills. Teacher Magazine. Retrieved from www.teachermagazine.com.au/article/global-education-21st-century-skills
Fraser, N. (2007). Abnormal justice. Retrieved from http://www.fehe.org/uploads/media/Fraser_Abnormal_Justice_essay.pdf
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gamoran, A., & Long, D.A. (2006). Equality of educational opportunity: A 40-year retrospective (Working paper no. 2006–9). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Grace, G. (1995). Beyond education management. London: Taylor and Francis.
Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 221–239.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.
Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behaviour of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247.
Harris, A., & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education, 22(1), 31–34.
Hitt, D. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leadership practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 31–69.
Homel, R., Freiberg, K., & Branch, S. (2015). CREATE-ing capacity to take developmental crime prevention to scale: A community-based approach within a national framework. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48(3), 367–385.
Jacobson, S. (2011). Leadership effects on student achievement and sustained school success. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 33–44.
Jacobson, S. L., Brooks, S., Giles, C., Johnson, L., & Ylimaki, R. (2007). Successful leadership in three high-poverty urban elementary schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(4), 291–317.
Johnson, G., Dempster, N., & Wheeley, E. (2016). Distributed leadership: Theory and practice dimensions in systems, schools and communities. In G. Johnson & N. Dempster (Eds.), Leadership in diverse learning contexts (pp. 3–31). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Leitch, R., & Mitchell, S. (2007). Caged birds and cloning machines: How student imagery ‘speaks’ to us about cultures of schooling and student participation. Improving Schools, 10(1), 53–71.
Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 498–518.
Leithwood, K. (2012). Ontario leadership framework with a discussion of the leadership foundations. Ottawa, Canada: Institute for Education Leadership, OISE Ottawa.
Leithwood, K., Seashore, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Minneapolis, MN/Toronto, Canada/New York: Centre for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota/Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto/The Wallace Foundation.
Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., Anderson, S. E., Michlin, M., & Mascall, B. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. Minneapolis, MN/Toronto, Canada/New York: Centre for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota/Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto/The Wallace Foundation.
MacBeath, J. (2006). A story of change: Growing leadership for learning. Journal of Educational Change, 7(1–2), 33–46.
MacBeath, J., & Dempster, N. (Eds.). (2009). Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice. London: Routledge.
MacBeath, J., Dempster, N., Frost, D., Johnson, G., & Swaffield, S. (2018). Strengthening the connections between leadership and learning. London: Routledge.
MacBeath, J., Sugimine, H., & with Sutherland, G., Nishimura, M., & The students of the Learning School. (2003). Self-evaluation in the global classroom. London: Routledge.
Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 370–397.
Murphy, J., Smylie, M., Mayrowetz, D., & Louis, K. S. (2009). The role of the principal in fostering the development of distributed leadership. School Leadership & Management, 29(2), 181–214.
Ober, R., & Bat, M. (2007). Paper 1: Both ways: The philosophy. Ngoonjook: A Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues, 31, 64–86.
Priest, K., King, S., Nagala, I., Nungurrayi Brown, W., & Nangala, M. (2008). Warrki Jarrinjaku ‘working together everyone and listening’: Growing together as leaders for aboriginal children in remote Central Australia. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 16(1), 117–130.
Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674.
Sammons, P., Gu, Q., Day, C., & Ko, J. (2011). Exploring the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 83–101.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Townsend, T., & MacBeath, J. (Eds.). (2011). International handbook on leadership for learning. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dempster, N. (2019). Leadership for Learning: Embracing Purpose, People, Pedagogy and Place. In: Townsend, T. (eds) Instructional Leadership and Leadership for Learning in Schools. Palgrave Studies on Leadership and Learning in Teacher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23736-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23736-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23735-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23736-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)