Abstract
The doctoral journey is an exciting and challenging experience for students as they progress towards the goal of making a contribution to the body of knowledge. For some students, the journey is a haphazard and chaotic experience, more akin to intrepid discovery than planned adventure. For others, the journey is a logical sequence of carefully coordinated activities. This chapter explores a project management approach to undertaking doctoral research whereby the student identifies targets, sets goals and monitors progress. Such an approach provides a foundation for the key research activities of reviewing literature, collecting data, analysing results and producing the thesis. Throughout the chapter, the author shares personal reflections as a doctoral candidate, supplemented by discussions with other Higher Degree Research students, to emphasise the value of using project management techniques to facilitate the process of achieving a Ph.D. The framework presented here may assist students who are embarking on doctoral research, and those who are currently on the Ph.D. journey, more effectively to focus effort and manage resources. The aim of the chapter is to share strategies so that candidates travelling the doctoral pathway can reach their destination within time, cost and quality (including scope) constraints.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Amran, N. N., & Ibrahim, R. (2012). Academic rites of passage: Reflection on a PhD journey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,59, 528–534.
Anon. (2014, January 14). The valley of shit vs the pit of despair (and why it’s important to know the difference). Retrieved from http://oncirculation.com/2014/01/14/the-valley-of-shit-vs-the-pit-of-despair/.
Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2013). Australian Qualifications Framework. South Australia: Australian Qualifications Framework Council.
Bell, J., & Waters, S. (2014). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers (6th ed.). Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
Bendemra, H. (2013, October 29). Doing a PhD can be a lonely business but it doesn’t have to be. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/doing-a-phd-can-be-a-lonely-business-but-it-doesnt-have-to-be-19192.
Bexley, E. (2014, May 21). Raising the cost of a PhD. Retrieved 11 February 2015, from http://theconversation.com/raising-the-cost-of-a-phd-26912.
Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members: Nihil nimus. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bolker, J. (1998). Writing your dissertation in fifteen minutes a day: A guide to starting, revising, and finishing your doctoral thesis. New York, USA: Holt Paperbacks.
Brabazon, T. (2010, January 28). How not to write a PhD thesis. Retrieved 4 May 2015, from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/how-not-to-write-a-phd-thesis/410208.article.
Cheruvelil, K. S., Soranno, P. A., Weathers, K. C., Hanson, P. C., Goring, S. J., Filstrup, C. T., & Read, E. K. (2014). Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: The importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(1), 31–38.
Cothran, H. M., & Wysocki, A. F. (2010). Developing SMART goals for your organization. Florida: University of Florida.
Crawford, L. (2003, November 27–30). PhD journey: Some shared experiences. Paper presented at the Adult Learning Australia Annual Conference, Sydney.
Creedy, J. (2007). A PhD thesis without tears. Australian Economic Review, 40(4), 463–470.
Dalcher, D. (2015). Going beyond the waterfall: Managing scope effectively across the project life cycle. Project Management Journal,46(1), e2–e2.
Dunleavy, P. (2003). Authoring a PhD: How to plan, draft, write and finish a doctoral thesis or dissertation. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Garner, J., Porter, A. L., Borrego, M., Tran, E., & Teutonico, R. (2013). Facilitating social and natural science cross-disciplinarity: Assessing the human and social dynamics program. Research Evaluation,22(2), 134–144.
Giezen, M. (2012). Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 781–790.
Goward, P. A., Holley, K., & McCulloch, A. (2015). Stories from my PhD journey: Rewriting my methodology chapter. International Journal for Researcher Development,6(1), 93–104.
Hill, E. M. (2014). In pursuit of the PhD. Student Motivation and Quality of Life in Higher Education, 10.
Horta, H., Cattaneo, M. & Meoli, M. (2019). The impact of Ph.D. funding on time to Ph.D. completion. Research Evaluation, rvz002, https://doi.org/10.1093/rev/rvz002.
Jiranek, V. (2010). Potential predictors of timely completion among dissertation research students at an Australian faculty of sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,5, 1–13.
Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. New Jersey, USA: Wiley.
Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2014). Project management: The managerial process (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Macfarlane, B. (2017). The paradox of collaboration: A moral continuum. Higher Education Research & Development,36(3), 472–485.
Mason, S. (2018). Publications in the doctoral thesis: Challenges for doctoral candidates, supervisors, examiners and administrators. Higher Education Research & Development,37(6), 1231–1244.
Müller, R., Rolstadås, A., Tommelein, I., Morten Schiefloe, P., & Ballard, G. (2014). Understanding project success through analysis of project management approach. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business,7(4), 638–660.
Papke-Shields, K. E., Beise, C., & Quan, J. (2010). Do project managers practice what they preach, and does it matter to project success? International Journal of Project Management,28(7), 650–662.
Park, C. (2005). New variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,27(2), 189–207.
Percy, A. (2014, March 26). Studying a PhD: Don’t suffer in silence. Higher Education Network. Retrieved 12 May 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2014/mar/25/studying-phd-dont-suffer-in-silence-seek-support.
Perry, C. (2013). Efficient and effective research: A toolkit for research students and developing researchers. Adelaide: AIB Publications.
Phillips, E., & Pugh, D. (2010). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors (5th ed.). Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill International.
Polonsky, M. J., & Waller, D. S. (2018). Designing and managing a research project: A business student’s guide (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
Project Management Institute. (2008). Project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (4th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute Inc.
Sinclair, J., Cuthbert, D., & Barnacle, R. (2014). The entrepreneurial subjectivity of successful researchers. Higher Education Research & Development,33(5), 1007–1019.
Spronken-Smith, R. (2018). Reforming doctoral education: There is a better way. UC Berkeley Research and Occasional Papers Series.
Spronken-Smith, R., Cameron, C., & Quigg, R. (2018). Factors contributing to high PhD completion rates: A case study in a research-intensive university in New Zealand. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,43(1), 94–109.
Stanley, P. (2014). Writing the PhD journey(s): An autoethnography of zine-writing, angst, embodiment, and backpacker travels. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,44(2), 373–395.
Strzepek, K. (2012, February 25). Stop! Imposter! Retrieved from http://oncirculation.com/2012/02/25/stop-imposter/.
Walliman, N. (2011). Your research project: Designing and planning your work (3rd ed.). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Winckler, G., & Fieder, M. (2012). The contribution of research universities in solving ‘grand challenges’. Global Sustainability and the Responsibilities, 179.
Young, T. L. (2013). Successful project management (2nd ed.). London, UK: Kogan Page Limited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doyle, J. (2019). Staying on Track: A Targeted Approach to Managing the Ph.D. Journey. In: Machin, T.M., Clarà, M., Danaher, P.A. (eds) Traversing the Doctorate. Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23731-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23731-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23730-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23731-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)